[CGUYS] TinEye.com

2009-05-14 Thread Brian Jones
Interesting tool... Reverse lookup for images! Give it an image, and it can tell you the source. http://tineye.com/ * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a

Re: [CGUYS] Cleaning the Inside of a Computer

2009-05-14 Thread Brian Jones
I am glad you have a clean computer... I believe the excessive dust can interfere with convective airflow which cools the chips... and hot chips mean shorter lifespan for the motherboard. While repairing customers computers, I have been using a 'reversed vacuum' for decades to blow out the

Re: [CGUYS] Vista-Windows mail and Emoticon's question

2009-05-14 Thread Terry Kilburg
Tony I just rechecked, my mail and news sending formats are still both set to html and not plain text. bbcode is the older, simpler form of html, isn't it? I just have 2 basic smileys. You can find them in your character map by looking under the Arial Font and under Unicode...the smileys are

[CGUYS] Chrome for Mac almost ready?

2009-05-14 Thread Jordan
I noticed this at Macrumers.com: The Chromium web browser project which serves as the basis for Google's Chrome has started releasing early builds of the Mac version. While not complete, the builds work well enough to get an impression of the browser. CNet took a quick look at a build: The

Re: [CGUYS] TinEye.com

2009-05-14 Thread Tony B
Pretty easy to fool it. I tried two, and it couldn't identify either. On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Brian Jones wjone...@carolina.rr.comwrote: Interesting tool... Reverse lookup for images! Give it an image, and it can tell you the source. http://tineye.com/

Re: [CGUYS] Vista-Windows mail and Emoticon's question

2009-05-14 Thread Tony B
bbcode is really a replacement for html - it allows doing things without using html, which is always a dangerous thing to allow members to do. Yes, I see the character now. ☺ It's a high number so may only be present in certain versions of the font, like maybe the Western whatever that we both