The full version of what happened surrounding GV being rejected (so says
google) or not rejected (so says apple) was finally released. Google
released a redacted version of their side earlier but now the full version
has been released and it says clearly that Apple rejected the app
completely.
On Sep 18, 2009, at 12:37 PM, mike wrote:
The full version of what happened surrounding GV being rejected (so
says
google) or not rejected (so says apple) was finally released. Google
released a redacted version of their side earlier but now the full
version
has been released and it says
Low level munchkin...oh I didn't mention, Phil Schiller himself rejected the
app.
I'm sure it's not just silly cause it's apple under attack, couldn't be
that.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:06 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 12:37 PM, mike wrote:
The full version of what
What topic exactly?
-Original Message-
If I'm not mistaken, google has brought this topic up before several
years
ago.
This explains why Google quietly changed their position on net
neutrality
in
December, despite PR-numbed statements otherwise.
It is sort of like when ATT, Verizon, MCI, Comcast, Global Crossing, and
several others I never heard of decided to install fiber in DC all in the
same month. Guys with huge rotary saws facing off at Conn K.
Inefficient. A waste of human capital based on a bad business
model. Looks like the
The topic of having their own 'fast lane'.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Jeff Wright jswri...@gmail.com wrote:
What topic exactly?
-Original Message-
If I'm not mistaken, google has brought this topic up before several
years
ago.
This explains why Google quietly
It is sort of like when ATT, Verizon, MCI, Comcast, Global Crossing, and
several others I never heard of decided to install
fiber in DC all in the same month. Guys with huge rotary saws
facing off at Conn K.
That was at the height of the .com boom in 2000. MFS was a
big player, there are
It will be interesting to watch Google terrorize complacent telecom
providers. Do you think they will suddenly find they need to manage
Google's traffic?
This explains why Google quietly changed their position on net neutrality in
December, despite PR-numbed statements otherwise.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Eric S. Sande esa...@erols.com wrote:
It will be interesting to watch Google terrorize complacent telecom
providers. Do you think they will suddenly find they need to manage
Google's traffic?
Probably not, it really doesn't make sense to be the traffic
there's no place to hide anymore ...soon they will link all that to google
earth and while speaking on the fone with clients or whatever those people
would be able to pinpoint you marching down the block to the strip joint!!
-Original Message-
From: Tony B [mailto:ton...@gmail.com]
Sent:
And what is their agenda?
And what is their [hidden] agenda?
I knew that would get a rise out of you. ;)
Is there a connection with the Illuminati?
I thought it was the Gomorrah. www.youtube.com/watch?v=hky53gXyjX0
*
**
This explains why Google quietly changed their position on net neutrality in
December, despite PR-numbed statements otherwise.
This reflects their assessment that the bad guys have won and it is time
to sue for peace.
Perhaps it is not too late for BHO's new CTO to save the day? One can
only
BHO's CTO is home on leave pending resolution of the mess in his old DC
government office.
IS BHO's CTO a BOFH?
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member
I thought it was the Gomorrah. (the video)
Inefficient. A waste of human capital based on a bad business
model. Looks like the Mexican drug wars.
But I guess that was your point?
*
** List info, subscription
If I'm not mistaken, google has brought this topic up before several years
ago.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Jeff Wright jswri...@gmail.com wrote:
This explains why Google quietly changed their position on net neutrality
in
December, despite PR-numbed statements otherwise.
Word is that Google Voice (formerly GrandCentral) will be launching within a
couple of weeks. It looks very, very cool (and free for domestic use).
The idea is you have one phone number, which you pick, that you give out to
everyone (business AND personal). Using caller ID, it will ring any of
Like so many other new things (Twitter, Facebook), I'm going to have
to be convinced. I already have a single phone number. Can this thing
automagically ring a cell phone if you're in the car, the home phone
when at home, and the work phone when at work?
Sounds like it would have been more useful
Like so many other new things (Twitter, Facebook), I'm going to have
to be convinced. I already have a single phone number. Can this thing
automagically ring a cell phone if you're in the car, the home phone
when at home, and the work phone when at work?
The site doesn't have all the details
Quoting Chris Dunford ch...@covesoftware.com:
to be convinced. I already have a single phone number. Can this thing
automagically ring a cell phone if you're in the car, the home phone
when at home, and the work phone when at work?
have it ring wherever you want. I assume that you would need
Soon enough, Google will know where you are.
You're assuming that they don't already.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at
Quoting Chris Dunford ch...@covesoftware.com:
Soon enough, Google will know where you are.
You're assuming that they don't already.
Actually, there is a story on Market Place tonight. Apparently (in
answer to Tony's question), *all* your phones will ring at once. You
should be able to
Word is that Google Voice (formerly GrandCentral) will be launching within a
couple of weeks. It looks very, very cool (and free for domestic use).
It will be interesting to watch Google terrorize complacent telecom
providers. Do you think they will suddenly find they need to manage
Google's
Yes. What a great idea. Every time someone calls me, the phones at
work will ring. Now the question becomes: If I answer at home, and
someone answers at work, will we have a 3-way conversation? I wonder
what it will be like at the office with everyone's private calls
ringing the phones???
It will be interesting to watch Google terrorize complacent telecom
providers. Do you think they will suddenly find they need to manage
Google's traffic?
Probably not, it really doesn't make sense to be the traffic management
police when the bottom line is selling bandwidth.
Who are these
24 matches
Mail list logo
