The Maryland Technology Council has built a website to inform us
about the
recently passed 6% sales tax on computer services, including website
development, website maintenance, and programming.
http://www.FightTheTechTax.com/index.cfm
/gayley
--
--
Gayley Knight
Mother Geek Productions
On Jan 26, 2008 7:16 PM, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now trying to access the drive F, I get this message from Windows: The
disk drive in F is not formatted. Do you want to format it now?
I recommend going to grc.com and buying SpinRite - you can just download
it and run it. You may
However, in my experience, this has never been the case with external
drives, which a lot of his seem to be (I don't remember if this one
was). This was a BIOS limitation only evident on EIDE internal drives.
It depends on the disk controller that is in the case.
You make a good point that the
I recommend going to grc.com and buying SpinRite - you can just download
it and run it. You may well find that it recovers the drive for you
completely.
Without a general idea of what needs to be fixed it is not a good idea to
run any repair utility. If it is a hardware problem, the data on
Followup on a suddenly unformatted drive. I have decided that the
internal hard drive F: that Windows reports as being unformatted is
reported by BelArc advisor as this one:
Maxtor 6Y120M0 [Hard drive] (122.94 GB) -- drive 2, s/n Y3KTK99E, rev
YAR51EW0, SMART http://www.belarc.com/smart.html
In the news these days are stories about how our current
administration is desperately trying to protect telephone companies
from lawsuits that may be or are being filed as a result of their
illegal participation in monitoring and wiretapping activities.
I just paid my phone bill
Right click my computer and select manage.
Select disk management.
See if the drive shows up. If it does right click it and see if it gives
you any options like convert foreign disk or convert to dynamic...anything
but format unless you want to lose your data. Sometimes when I connect
internal
Whoa there hoss.
You are mistaking two different sets of privacy.
1.) The privacy of your information as a customer and your financial
information you share with them. (As just evidenced as you made you
payment on your phone bill using a financial instrument.)
2.) You extrapolate this
It was the As always part that got to me the most. Pure horse
manure.
Verizon is committed to the privacy of communications.
In the absence of a court order we will not divulge subscriber
information or traffic details.
That is how our front line forces are trained to operate.
Privacy has gone the way of the dodo. Technology rules. Get over it.
Fred Holmes
At 07:32 PM 1/27/2008, Steve Rigby wrote:
In the news these days are stories about how our current
administration is desperately trying to protect telephone companies
from lawsuits that may be or are being
On Jan 27, 2008, at 8:20 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Whoa there hoss.
You are mistaking two different sets of privacy.
I do not think I am mistaking two different sets of privacy.
Privacy guarantees as pertaining to my personal information is
exactly what could have been violated
eeye's Blink does it all as well. http://www.eeye.com You can get
a free copy to review for a year.
On Jan 25, 2008 7:11 PM, db [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you google all the security suite reviews, you will see that Zone
Alarm Internet Security Suite gets the best overall reviews. I have
I was unaware that Verizon had resisted executive
orders (sidestepping the relevant court required under
FISA) to allow wiretaps on US citizens.
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
Whatever you want to believe.
It has always amazed me that people want privacy but leave it all
hang out (so to speak) In this day of technology you leave so many
digital footprints out there. Kind of reminds me of the Head of
google getting all bent out of shape when Cnet googled his info
Without a general idea of what needs to be fixed it is not a good idea to
run any repair utility. If it is a hardware problem, the data on the disk
could be fine now and could get scrambled by the repair utility.
That happens not to be the case for SpinRite. Could be for other utilities.
On Jan 27, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Collusion with NSA? If the feds come up to me and say we need
this, my first reaction, when and how soon! They are the
government and I am responsible to them.
I think the opposite. I, and you, are the most dominant and
On Jan 27, 2008, at 9:40 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
I grew up being taught that ex post facto laws were prohibited by
the
Constitution (Article I, section 9). Or is this just another of those
inconvenient truths?
Some would say that you grew up in a different generation, that
things are
In the news these days are stories about how our current
administration is desperately trying to protect telephone companies
from lawsuits that may be or are being filed as a result of their
illegal participation in monitoring and wiretapping activities.
I grew up being taught that ex post
On Jan 27, 2008, at 8:07 PM, Fred Holmes wrote:
Privacy has gone the way of the dodo. Technology rules. Get over it.
Yeah, well, I'm pickin' my nose right now, but you still can't see
me do it, can you?
Steve
*
I have been married for 27 years. No longer a reason to worry. :-)
Stewart
At 09:21 PM 1/27/2008, you wrote:
Really? Even to your most intimate and perhaps revealing of
conversations?
Steve
Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL SL 82
Many thanks Richard. It worked!
Marcio
At 11:38 26/1/2008, Richard P. wrote:
Did you try defragging in the safe mode?
Richard P.
Computers are forever surprising me...
Now I am trying to defragment my C: drive and guess what shows in
the lower bar?
PROGRAM (C:) Paused for Volume
On Jan 27, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
Verizon is committed to the privacy of communications.
In the absence of a court order we will not divulge subscriber
information or traffic details.
That is how our front line forces are trained to operate.
But, it was not the front line
I do not think I am mistaking two different sets of privacy.
Privacy guarantees as pertaining to my personal information is
exactly what could have been violated by Verizon in their collusion
with the NSA.
Could have? That's a weak argument as far as evidence that
Verizon colluded with
On Jan 27, 2008, at 10:17 PM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
I do not think I am mistaking two different sets of privacy.
Privacy guarantees as pertaining to my personal information is
exactly what could have been violated by Verizon in their
collusion with the NSA.
Could have? That's a weak
24 matches
Mail list logo
