Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Roger D. Parish

At 11:46 PM -0400 4/23/09, Eric S. Sande wrote:


To get an idea of the league these guys are playing in check out:

Cary SLP-05, US $7.5K.
Audio Research LS-17, US $4K.
Audio Research LS-26, US $6K.

And these are just _preamps_, for crying out loud.

Of course these are all balanced, US made, somewhat acceptable
tube preamps.

If you think computers are crazy, you should try audio.

But there is a market for this stuff and things even WAY more
expensive.

Crank up the sound.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xs1aUws0Lrs



My God! My first reaction is: more money than brains, but that's 
not fair; I, too, have my little obsessions. I loved the turntables 
these guys have.


I'm surprised that vacuum tubes are still being manufactured! I know 
people collect them from going to estate auctions.


All of that audio quality would be wasted on these old ears, anyway.
--
Roger
Lovettsville, VA


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall
popoz...@earthlink.net wrote:

 A similar question was asked of Paul Kliptsch who made only high end
 speakers. (Came out with a bookshelf model named heresy)

 Because that is where the market is.

  A portion of the market.


 If Apple wants to show us it is all about good stuff.  Make and market a
 netbook that is better than all the rest.

  But then it would likely be too expensive and the Lauren's and G's
wouldn't buy it.  Only snobs would buy it.


 Apple is about Computers.  The computer market is shifting away from
 desktops (I think the past few years laptops have outsold desktops)

  Again, a portion of the market.  If you're just interested in
e-mail, tweeting, casual surfing and occasional word processing, a
small screen laptop may be fine.  If you're doing real work that
necessitates being able to see things without undue discomfort or
strain, no typical laptop is going to provide you with a 19 or larger
screen and a detached keyboard.

  My brother does database work, and his workplace provides him with a
Dell laptop that he uses at work.  His previous jobs gave him desktop
machines to use.  He says that having to work on a laptop all day
totally rags him out as opposed to how he used to feel after a day
using a desktop machine.  He'd love to have a larger screen for
looking at all those tiny little numbers and letters, but he isn't
going to get that where he currently is employed, so he'll just have
to deal with being exhausted at the end of every day.

  Laptops are just not the best tool for working with all day long
unless it needs to be portable.  In the situation involving my
brother, the portability only involves being able to haul the computer
home so he can continue to have to work even when on his own time,
which I guess means it really isn't his own time at all. (FWIW, I give
him a hard time about that.)

  Also, the reason for laptops at the office as opposed to desktops is
all about money and how to squeeze work out of the employee while out
of the office.  Laptops take up less space, which means the desk can
be smaller which then means the cubicles can be smaller which then
means more workers can be crammed into a given space which translates
to less square footage which equals cheaper rent.  Maybe with really
tiny hand-held computers, all the desks, chairs and cubicles could be
completely eliminated and all the employees could stand instead of
sit.  Then you could really cram a lot of workers into a very small
space.  Now, that's a bit silly, but I'm just making a Dilbert point
about computer based work environments.

 At this point people are about small portable appliances that are easy to
 transport and use.  (Iphone, Itouch ec.)

  Some people are.  Many fortunate folks, me included, have no need or
desire to have to transport their work computer.

  As to that easy to use thing, have you ever watched someone using
an iPhone?  Ever notice how often they have to struggle to touch the
correct area of the screen?  Ever notice how many times they have to
make corrections?  Easy to use?  Not necessarily.


 Instead of looking down your nose at a segment of the market.  Make it
 better and show others how it is supposed to be done.

  Most things that are better made are more expensive.  Once again,
right back to that same old problem.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Scott McClure
When I was a kid, I can the vacuum tube tester at the local Radio Shack.  It 
was as self-service machine with a bunch of tube sockets on the top.  

My parents had an old David Bogen pre-amp with tubes (as part of a mono system) 
and I used to find it frustrating to wait for the thing to warm up.  I now 
experience similar frustration every workday when I restart or shutdown my 
work-issued Windows laptop.

Scott





From: Roger D. Parish rogerd.par...@gmail.com


I'm surprised that vacuum tubes are still being manufactured! I know 
people collect them from going to estate auctions.




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*




  


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread mike
Would it be possible for him to purchase an inexpensive monitor and
keyboard/mouse combo for his laptop.  Couple hundered bux could help him
take care of some of that wear and tear he is getting from the cramped
keyboard/monitor of the laptop.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:07 AM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall
 popoz...@earthlink.net wrote:

  A similar question was asked of Paul Kliptsch who made only high end
  speakers. (Came out with a bookshelf model named heresy)
 
  Because that is where the market is.

   A portion of the market.


  If Apple wants to show us it is all about good stuff.  Make and market a
  netbook that is better than all the rest.

   But then it would likely be too expensive and the Lauren's and G's
 wouldn't buy it.  Only snobs would buy it.


  Apple is about Computers.  The computer market is shifting away from
  desktops (I think the past few years laptops have outsold desktops)

   Again, a portion of the market.  If you're just interested in
 e-mail, tweeting, casual surfing and occasional word processing, a
 small screen laptop may be fine.  If you're doing real work that
 necessitates being able to see things without undue discomfort or
 strain, no typical laptop is going to provide you with a 19 or larger
 screen and a detached keyboard.

  My brother does database work, and his workplace provides him with a
 Dell laptop that he uses at work.  His previous jobs gave him desktop
 machines to use.  He says that having to work on a laptop all day
 totally rags him out as opposed to how he used to feel after a day
 using a desktop machine.  He'd love to have a larger screen for
 looking at all those tiny little numbers and letters, but he isn't
 going to get that where he currently is employed, so he'll just have
 to deal with being exhausted at the end of every day.

  Laptops are just not the best tool for working with all day long
 unless it needs to be portable.  In the situation involving my
 brother, the portability only involves being able to haul the computer
 home so he can continue to have to work even when on his own time,
 which I guess means it really isn't his own time at all. (FWIW, I give
 him a hard time about that.)

  Also, the reason for laptops at the office as opposed to desktops is
 all about money and how to squeeze work out of the employee while out
 of the office.  Laptops take up less space, which means the desk can
 be smaller which then means the cubicles can be smaller which then
 means more workers can be crammed into a given space which translates
 to less square footage which equals cheaper rent.  Maybe with really
 tiny hand-held computers, all the desks, chairs and cubicles could be
 completely eliminated and all the employees could stand instead of
 sit.  Then you could really cram a lot of workers into a very small
 space.  Now, that's a bit silly, but I'm just making a Dilbert point
 about computer based work environments.

  At this point people are about small portable appliances that are easy to
  transport and use.  (Iphone, Itouch ec.)

   Some people are.  Many fortunate folks, me included, have no need or
 desire to have to transport their work computer.

  As to that easy to use thing, have you ever watched someone using
 an iPhone?  Ever notice how often they have to struggle to touch the
 correct area of the screen?  Ever notice how many times they have to
 make corrections?  Easy to use?  Not necessarily.


  Instead of looking down your nose at a segment of the market.  Make it
  better and show others how it is supposed to be done.

   Most things that are better made are more expensive.  Once again,
 right back to that same old problem.

  Steve


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)
My company provides most employees with laptops.  We are pressed to take
them home, 'tho I usually leave mine behind unless I need to take it
home.  We all attach one or two LCD screens in the office.  Tell your
brother to buy a monitor for his laptop, he should be able to find one
from HP or Dell for around $75 in a sale.

Thank you,

Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
  My brother does database work, and his workplace provides him with a
Dell laptop that he uses at work.  His previous jobs gave him desktop
machines to use.  He says that having to work on a laptop all day
totally rags him out as opposed to how he used to feel after a day using
a desktop machine.  He'd love to have a larger screen for looking at all
those tiny little numbers and letters, but he isn't going to get that
where he currently is employed, so he'll just have to deal with being
exhausted at the end of every day.

  Laptops are just not the best tool for working with all day long
unless it needs to be portable.  In the situation involving my brother,
the portability only involves being able to haul the computer home so he
can continue to have to work even when on his own time, which I guess
means it really isn't his own time at all. (FWIW, I give him a hard time
about that.)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread mike
That doesn't help his situation..has he actually checked to see if he can
put a monitor on his desk?  We are talking almost zero foot print...keyboard
mouse.  It could increase his well being and productivity.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:13 AM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:22 AM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:

  Would it be possible for him to purchase an inexpensive monitor and
  keyboard/mouse combo for his laptop.  Couple hundered bux could help him
  take care of some of that wear and tear he is getting from the cramped
  keyboard/monitor of the laptop.

   I think he should quit bringing his work computer home altogether,
 and I do not think he can change his work set-up at the office.  He
 says that virtually everyone uses laptops at the office...except for
 the administrative staff.  They have desktops.  They don't take work
 home.

  Steve


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
But then it would likely be too expensive and the Lauren's and G's
wouldn't buy it.  Only snobs would buy it.

Is there some middle ground between snobs and destitute?

I'll admit that there are people so poor that they have to buy computers 
like the one Lauren bought, but is that representative of more than the 
bottom 10% of the market for computers?

Is that a good market for a successful manufacturer? Is the tiny profit 
margin on such computers worth the bother of selling to this market?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
Not every company has the extra cash necessary to operate this way. 
Providing poor hardware to staff lowers staff productivity and increases 
error rates. It makes staff tireder and less likely to get innovative 
insights.

The poor hardware is probably losing the company 30 to 40 percent of each 
employee's labor cost. So instead of spending an extra $2000 to get a 
proper computer they are spending $100,000 per computer on lower staff 
productivity (over the 3-year life of the miserable computer).

That's why CFOs need to pay more attention to the bad decisions made by 
IT.


My brother does database work, and his workplace provides him with a
Dell laptop that he uses at work.  His previous jobs gave him desktop
machines to use.  He says that having to work on a laptop all day
totally rags him out as opposed to how he used to feel after a day
using a desktop machine.  He'd love to have a larger screen for
looking at all those tiny little numbers and letters, but he isn't
going to get that where he currently is employed, so he'll just have
to deal with being exhausted at the end of every day.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
Would it be possible for him to purchase an inexpensive monitor and
keyboard/mouse combo for his laptop.  Couple hundered bux could help him
take care of some of that wear and tear he is getting from the cramped
keyboard/monitor of the laptop.

Apple laptops will drive a large, wide-screen monitor. I suppose some PCs 
can do this too.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)
Yes, but the middle ground appears to be named cheap.  Consider the
number of people with high levels of debt and then the shrinking number
of jobs; personal computer buying appears to be at least 75% el-cheapo.

Thank you,

Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
Is there some middle ground between snobs and destitute?

I'll admit that there are people so poor that they have to buy computers
like the one Lauren bought, but is that representative of more than the
bottom 10% of the market for computers?

Is that a good market for a successful manufacturer? Is the tiny profit
margin on such computers worth the bother of selling to this market?



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy
**
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/
**

*


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)
Most graphic cards can run at least a moderately-large monitor.  The
days when few PC laptops can do this are long-gone.  Apple includes a
high-end graphics card in all but the low-end, but low-end cards will
drive a decent sized monitor.

Thank you,

Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
Apple laptops will drive a large, wide-screen monitor. I suppose some
PCs can do this too.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)
mark.sny...@ngc.com wrote:

 My company provides most employees with laptops.  We are pressed to take
 them home, 'tho I usually leave mine behind unless I need to take it
 home.  We all attach one or two LCD screens in the office.  Tell your
 brother to buy a monitor for his laptop, he should be able to find one
 from HP or Dell for around $75 in a sale.

  Sure, but he shouldn't have to be the one to buy the monitor.
Workers should also not have to do work on their own time, though I
guess that when a worker is salaried as opposed to paid on an hourly
basis, companies might seem to think that they own all of the
employee's time.

 Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] APPL vs MSFT Stats [Was: No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
Yes, but the middle ground appears to be named cheap.  Consider the
number of people with high levels of debt and then the shrinking number
of jobs; personal computer buying appears to be at least 75% el-cheapo.

And in the news...

Microsoft profits sink 32 percent.

Apple profits rise 15 percent.

Apple earnings are now 40% of Microsoft's as the gap narrows further.

Care to explain away reality?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)
Shoulda, woulda, coulda ...  Life is too short.  If spending $50 to $100
dollars on something the company should have provided makes my day less
than grueling, I won't hesitate.

I make a decent salary, so am not talking about spending money I don't
have.

Thank you,

Mark Snyder
-Original Message-

  Sure, but he shouldn't have to be the one to buy the monitor.
Workers should also not have to do work on their own time, though I
guess that when a worker is salaried as opposed to paid on an hourly
basis, companies might seem to think that they own all of the employee's
time.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] OT: Comcast Cable HD

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
Hooking up the conversion box was a snap once the antenna was built.  
We are getting many channels through the HD box. Sadly, though, WETA  
is not one of them. It is interesting to see what's coming over the  
air, though. This may inspire us to investigate a bit more --  maybe  
even dump Comcast.

Enter your address at antennaweb.com to see what you can get OTA. I added 
an outside antenna and we are very happy with it. No Comcast!


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Video formats for Final Cut

2009-04-24 Thread b_s-wilk

My only concern was the availability of the format.  Istockphoto, for
example, looks like a lot of their stuff is .mov.  We're going to be
drawing on a lot of pre-recorded clips.




It's fine to use .mov files, but since you use a Mac, iMovie will be 
faster and easier than FCP.


Uncompressed video is best, although almost any video format can be 
imported, or converted for import at needed, using QuickTime Pro or ffmpegX.


Betty


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
Shoulda, woulda, coulda ...  Life is too short.  If spending $50 to $100
dollars on something the company should have provided makes my day less
than grueling, I won't hesitate.

Won't that be violating the company policy to be unproductive? 


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] CLI

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
Who needs all this computer forensics -- just a few minutes of 
waterboarding will tell us all we need to know. The government needs to 
be more efficient.

The bigger question is to whether the email was illegal in the first place
and how poorly reasoned the search warrant application was.  He was also
suspected of grade changing which would have been a better cause for the
action if they had sufficient evidence for a warrant.  It looks like they
really want to pin the grade changing on him and are using the emails as a
reason to search his computer.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Hey even those cheap throw away crappy netbooks will drive one of those.

Stewart


At 09:45 AM 4/24/2009, you wrote:

Apple laptops will drive a large, wide-screen monitor. I suppose some PCs
can do this too.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] APPL vs MSFT Stats

2009-04-24 Thread Tony B
Perhaps this does need to be explained to you, though I doubt it.
Apple's profit was not from computers; those sales actually fell.
Translation: Not good news for you.

MS's losses are indicative of the economy right now; very few
companies reported profits. Translation: Not good news for you.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] APPL vs MSFT Stats [Was: No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
Yup they make more profit as they are a direct to market seller, and 
make profit on both the hardware and software.


MS make profit only on software and only on PC's sold.

Apple of course is more diversified so it make profit from more sectors.

Good for them of course.

Stewart


At 11:30 AM 4/24/2009, you wrote:

And in the news...

Microsoft profits sink 32 percent.

Apple profits rise 15 percent.

Apple earnings are now 40% of Microsoft's as the gap narrows further.

Care to explain away reality?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread b_s-wilk

At one time they would have been at the high middle.


I wouldn't put Denon or Onkyo in the same category as McIntosh.
BO is probably closer to Apple in design philosopy and market
niche, IMHO.


So you are saying apple is for elitist snobs?


Apple products are for people who want good quality electronics that 
last a long time, at a reasonable price.


The more expensive _netbooks_ cost up to $5000. The $300 ones are cheap, 
made cheaply, and don't last, but if you don't need a forever product 
with a lot more features, why not get the cheap one. Just don't expect 
the same quality for the low prices.


Quality electronics cost more to make, same for quality bicycles, audio, 
HDTVs, cameras, cars, etc.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] APPL vs MSFT Stats [Was: No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
Apple of course is more diversified so it make profit from more sectors.

AAPL more diversified? Did MSFT close down a large part of the company 
while I was not looking? This claim makes no sense at all. Someone who 
believes it will believe anything.

Or is this just another example of WFBs spouting random nonesense to try 
scoring a point for their beloved under achiever.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] APPL vs MSFT Stats

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
Perhaps this does need to be explained to you, though I doubt it.
Apple's profit was not from computers; those sales actually fell.
Translation: Not good news for you.

The iPhone  iTouch are not computers? They run OS X. With all the 
current discussion of netbooks I'm surprised that you don't recognize the 
ultimate net book. Or is being crappy a prerequisite for being a net book?

MS's losses are indicative of the economy right now; very few
companies reported profits. Translation: Not good news for you.

Very few, like big gains at Apple?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] APPL vs MSFT Stats

2009-04-24 Thread Chris Dunford
 The iPhone  iTouch are not computers? They run OS X. With all the
 current discussion of netbooks I'm surprised that you don't recognize
 the
 ultimate net book. Or is being crappy a prerequisite for being a net
 book?

No, but a keyboard sure is. And a screen big enough to read a word
processing document or a spreadsheet. 


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] monitor cables

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
It's the digital version of the analog VGA cable. For more info than
you would ever want to know:

There is also a flavor of DVI cable that does VGA passthrough. Lots of 
fun sorting through the various DVI cable flavors.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
And we wonder why Apple is called elitist?

Apple already makes a better product in this category.

I suspect the reason Apple is even bothering to trash netbooks is because 
they have a bigger iTouch in the works. Be sure to feign surprise when 
you see it.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Chris Dunford
 Woopie, just what the world has been waiting for.
 
 Apparently 1 of the 3 will be your anti-virus software.

No, it isn't like that. AV doesn't count, nor does any of Windows itself
(e.g., Explorer Windows, command windows, control panel apps, Task Manager,
etc.). Installers don't count. Most desktop gadgets don't count. Multiple
windows from the same app don't count.

Considering what a netbook is intended for, limiting it to three open full
applications isn't much of a restriction. And if it isn't, nothing prevents
you from installing a different edition of Win7 on it. It's just intended to
be the base version of Windows for installation by the OEMs.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
Considering what a netbook is intended for, limiting it to three open full
applications isn't much of a restriction. And if it isn't, nothing prevents
you from installing a different edition of Win7 on it. It's just intended to
be the base version of Windows for installation by the OEMs.

Were you around whan IBM came out theit its PC Jr? It is like that.

I'm not big on vendors who artificially cripple their software.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Tubes

2009-04-24 Thread Eric S. Sande
I'm surprised that vacuum tubes are still being manufactured! I know 
people collect them from going to estate auctions.


There are still quite a few compamies making them in China and
the countries of the former USSR.

Even a few Western countries, including the US.


Non NOS audio type tubes are ususally Russian or Chinese,
hopefully mil-spec.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] APPL vs MSFT Stats

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
iTouch/iPhone are fine machines, Tom, but they are emphatically NOT
netbooks. Until you can show me someone typing a document at full speed into
OpenOffice or an equivalent, I ain't buying that line for a second. 

My point is that a net book's keyboard is too small for serious typing. 
It is just barely better than the iPhone/iTouch's version. Not better 
enough.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Chris Dunford
 Were you around whan IBM came out theit its PC Jr? It is like that.

Yes, I was around, and it is not like that at all. It is a version that is
intended for the limited hardware environment of lower-end netbooks, that's
all. 


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] APPL vs MSFT Stats

2009-04-24 Thread Chris Dunford
 My point is that a net book's keyboard is too small for serious typing.
 It is just barely better than the iPhone/iTouch's version. Not better
 enough.

You have a lot of real-life experience typing on netbooks? Or watching
people who do? My son can type just as fast on his netbook as he can on a
desktop, and it didn't take him more than a couple of hours to get to that
point. I can type almost as fast on it as on my real keyboard, and I haven't
used it much at all.

To say that a reduced-size version of a real keyboard is barely better
than a tiny touchscreen simulation of a keyboard is fantasy.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
Yes, I was around, and it is not like that at all. It is a version that is
intended for the limited hardware environment of lower-end netbooks, that's
all. 

Then why not let the hardware and the patience of the user determine how 
many applications can run?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] APPL vs MSFT Stats

2009-04-24 Thread Tom Piwowar
To say that a reduced-size version of a real keyboard is barely better
than a tiny touchscreen simulation of a keyboard is fantasy.

I'll wait for Apple to do it right.

http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/04/braintweet.html


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] APPL vs MSFT Stats

2009-04-24 Thread Chris Dunford
 To say that a reduced-size version of a real keyboard
 is barely better than a tiny touchscreen simulation 
 of a keyboard is fantasy.
 
 I'll wait for Apple to do it right.

I'm shocked.

Of course, in the meantime the rest of us are getting our work done with our
crappy keyboard-based non-Borgified netbooks.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No netbook for you!

2009-04-24 Thread Eric S. Sande

So you are saying apple is for elitist snobs?


I didn't mean to imply that.  I just meant that to BO and
Apple, design considerations have a similar importance.

Apple executes better than BO.  That is one reason that
BO isn't doing better than it is.  Another reason is that
although both companies have similar business models,
e. g. dedicated, branded retail stores, there is a lot of respect
among computer enthusiasts for Apple.

BO has little to no respect among audiophiles.

I frequent audiophile forums, where the focus is on music
listening and appreciation to a greater degree than how pretty
the equipment is (I happen to prefer the minimalist black box
style myself :-)).

BO is never mentioned.

I think I can spot the distinction between a design with no
soul and one with.

Macs (the computers) have, undeniably and no matter what
other considerations there may be, soul.

BO makes very pretty Yuppie toys.  I never found Danish
furniture particularly comfortable to sit in either. 


I'm sure that Apple will eventually have a player in the netbook
realm, I'm guessing a scaled-down Air replacement, when they
see an opportunity.  I can wait.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*