...you mean the name should be "dumbphones" ??
-Original Message-
From: phartz...@gmail.com [mailto:phartz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: Cell phone radiated power
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Chris Dunford wrote:
> As Bob Park likes to say, Albe
http://zapatopi.net/afdb/ together with
http://www.cell-mateus.com/aboutcell-mate.html ...let's start an investment
fund!!
-Original Message-
From: John Duncan Yoyo [mailto:johnduncany...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: Cell phone radiated power
There was
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Chris Dunford wrote:
> As Bob Park likes to say, Albert Einstein won the Nobel Prize in 1905 for
> showing that cell phones can't cause cancer. It seems to me that cell
> phone-related cancer is what's mostly rejected "out of
> hand".
Mostly that is what was
Here you go .you should all get this thing .it's gonna cook yer brainz !!
http://www.ismashphone.com/2009/01/cellmate-headset-keeps-cell-phone-at-your
-ear-if-it-really-exists-that-is.html
You are guaranteed to be a veritable "yoyo" in as little as a week
(depending on how much brain you st
> It is funny how so many folks who have dismissed, out of hand, any
> suggestion that the radiation from a cell phone has any effect upon
> the brain or other bodily tissues have fully embraced this finding.
As Bob Park likes to say, Albert Einstein won the Nobel Prize in 1905 for
showing that
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:08 PM, John DeCarlo wrote:
> For those who are Google-impaired and will no doubt complain:
>
> http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-01/cell-phone-exposure-reverses-alzheimers-and-boosts-memory-mice
It is funny how so many folks who have dismissed, out of hand
For those who are Google-impaired and will no doubt complain:
http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-01/cell-phone-exposure-reverses-alzheimers-and-boosts-memory-mice
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:02 AM, John Duncan Yoyo
wrote:
> There was a lengthy (for Popular Science) article on this this
There was a lengthy (for Popular Science) article on this this month.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:02 AM, phartz...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:21 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
>
> > Oh no! Here we go again.
>
> Microwave RF can most certainly damage human cells. If you can
> defeat th
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:21 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
> Oh no! Here we go again.
Microwave RF can most certainly damage human cells. If you can
defeat the safety switch, stick your hand into a microwave oven and
turn it on if you think this is but an urban myth.
Of course, cell phones produce
Break out the aluminium helmets.
I find a good metal strainer works well.
Stewart
At 10:21 PM 2/18/2010, you wrote:
On Feb 18, 2010, at 10:31 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
the RF signals used by
these phones are microwaves that are known to be able to damage
human cells.
Oh no! Here we go
On Feb 18, 2010, at 10:31 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
the RF signals used by
these phones are microwaves that are known to be able to damage
human cells.
Oh no! Here we go again.
*
** List info, subscription manag
Smart phones radiate much more power than do "regular" cell phones.
A number of smart phones, including the Droid, radiate at powers that
reach right up to the limit as set by the FCC. These power limits are
imposed specifically for user safety because the RF signals used by
these phones are mic
12 matches
Mail list logo
