On Oct 21, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Art Clemons wrote:
So far, the folks at Comcast don't seem to have monitoring what a user
does as a model. Comcast is instead relying on reports that the
user's
IP address seems to harbor a bot.
You really believe that? Think about it harder.
You really believe that? Think about it harder.
Comcast likely faces legal scrutiny if it is caught lying either by a
court or the FCC. The other point to consider is that presently Comcast
among other large ISPs is treading on thin ice regulation wise. I
suspect undisclosed monitoring would
On Oct 22, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Art Clemons wrote:
Comcast likely faces legal scrutiny if it is caught lying either by a
court or the FCC.
And what would be the consequence of their lying? A FCC letter saying
please don't do this again? After all that has happened with the
government and
And what would be the consequence of their lying? A FCC letter saying please
don't do this again? After all that has happened with the government and
Comcast in recent years I can't understand how you can be so naive.
Believe it or not, an infuriated FCC can make life hell for a cable
Comcast Unveils Comprehensive “Constant Guard” Internet Security Program
http://www.comcast.com/About/PressRelease/PressReleaseDetail.ashx?
PRID=926
As part of this effort, starting today in Denver, CO, Comcast will
begin to trial an in-browser notification “Service Notice”, which
will
My bet is that if you are using torrents or other services that compete with
Comcast business they will pepper you with notices to such as extent that you
won't be able to use the service. Effectively a DOS attack in sheep's
clothing.
So far, the folks at Comcast don't seem to have
