Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

I suppose because I don't put people in groups and decide I'm better than they are. Silly me I look at individuals. On Nov 11, 2009 5:41 AM, "Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)" wrote: No, I took it the same way I'd react to bumpkin. Why the super-sensitive reaction, response? Thank you, Mark Snyder ---

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

These ad folks are pretty savvy and do a lot of market research before they put together these ads. That is what they are paid for. Occasionally they drop a bomb (pun not intended) but usually they do a very good job. When I first saw the commercial I was intrigued then when they did the dr

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

http://xkcd.com/662/ On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:28 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:05 AM, tjpa wrote: > > > More aggressive distracted posting from Mike. He can't really pay > attention > > to what you post because he's also in three chat rooms, streaming youtube > > a

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:05 AM, tjpa wrote: > More aggressive distracted posting from Mike. He can't really pay attention > to what you post because he's also in three chat rooms, streaming youtube > and hulu videos, shopping for gaiters at five different online stores, > reading four other ema

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

On Nov 11, 2009, at 6:44 AM, mike wrote: Is there a reason you think you are so much better than other people or is it just a general sense of superiority? You seem to have a horrible view of people who aren't exactly like you. More aggressive distracted posting from Mike. He can't really

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

I apologize if I read you wrong. I hadn't judged the people in the ad nor felt the ad had judged them. So I thought you were, not relating that you felt the ad itself was judging them. On Nov 11, 2009 6:12 AM, "phartz...@gmail.com" wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:21 AM, mike wrote: > Did yo

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:21 AM, mike wrote: > Did you miss the part where anyone not living in a big city was a rube? > Just because someone works outside they are automatically stupid? Hey, I live and work way out in the country myself, miles from any urban area!! Maybe that does make me st

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

No, I took it the same way I'd react to bumpkin. Why the super-sensitive reaction, response? Thank you, Mark Snyder Original Message- Did you miss the part where anyone not living in a big city was a rube? Just because someone works outside they are automatically stupid? *

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

Did you miss the part where anyone not living in a big city was a rube? Just because someone works outside they are automatically stupid? On Nov 11, 2009 5:13 AM, "Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)" wrote: Mike, why the personal attack? This struck me as way over the top and I could see nothing in the po

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

Mike, why the personal attack? This struck me as way over the top and I could see nothing in the post that would indicate your characterization? Thank you, Mark Snyder -Original Message- Is there a reason you think you are so much better than other people or is it just a general sense o

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

Is there a reason you think you are so much better than other people or is it just a general sense of superiority? You seem to have a horrible view of people who aren't exactly like you. On Nov 10, 2009 10:13 PM, "phartz...@gmail.com" wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:20 PM, tjpa wrote: > Inter

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:20 PM, tjpa wrote: > Interesting. iPhone ads are all about what the phone can do. Droid ads are > all about everything and anything else. I noted the obvious imagery of collusion between Motorola, Verizon, Google and the Pentagon as they collectively launch an attack

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

On Nov 9, 2009, at 11:26 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ_sOAhoc0o Interesting. iPhone ads are all about what the phone can do. Droid ads are all about everything and anything else. * **

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

This is exactly like marketing that flowery phone on verizon that looks like a compact to young girls. On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall < revsamarsh...@earthlink.net> wrote: > For people in my sons age group it is perfect. He is a huge transformers > nut. > > Stewart > > >

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

For people in my sons age group it is perfect. He is a huge transformers nut. Stewart At 11:31 PM 11/9/2009, you wrote: Thanks, I found four commercials for droid but not that one. I can see the michael bay effect strong on that one, not a good thing. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:26 PM, phartz.

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

Thanks, I found four commercials for droid but not that one. I can see the michael bay effect strong on that one, not a good thing. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:26 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, mike wrote: > > > Saw three more linked off engadget, all 'droid does'

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, mike wrote: > Saw three more linked off engadget, all 'droid does' commercials with a > robot theme.  Still no go on the ones you are referring to. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ_sOAhoc0o ***

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

Saw three more linked off engadget, all 'droid does' commercials with a robot theme. Still no go on the ones you are referring to. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:05 PM, mike wrote: > Nope, at least not for me, all I get are a lot of reviews and the iDont > commercial. > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

Nope, at least not for me, all I get are a lot of reviews and the iDont commercial. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:44 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:24 PM, mike wrote: > > > I must have missed that droid ad. > > Watch just about any male oriented sports program on major n

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:24 PM, mike wrote: > I must have missed that droid ad. Watch just about any male oriented sports program on major network TV, football, NASCAR, anything macho, and you'll get to see the ad. It is big time jingoistic looking. When I first saw it, I was sure it was a

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

I must have missed that droid ad. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:37 AM, mike wrote: > > > You can take screenshots, don't think it's built in though. > > Speaking of the coming of the "Droids," here is what the Motley > Fools say about t

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:37 AM, mike wrote: > You can take screenshots, don't think it's built in though. Speaking of the coming of the "Droids," here is what the Motley Fools say about the $100 million ad campaign recently launched on TV. They felt the same uneasy and shuddering feeling I ha

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

You can take screenshots, don't think it's built in though. On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:14 PM, b_s-wilk wrote: > He might have been wanting to take screenshots >> > > You mean like on the iPhone and iPod Touch? That's build-in, no extra app > needed. Can Droid do screenshots too? Can it select and

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

He might have been wanting to take screenshots You mean like on the iPhone and iPod Touch? That's build-in, no extra app needed. Can Droid do screenshots too? Can it select and save images? Betty * ** List info, subscr

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

He might have been wanting to take screenshots On Nov 7, 2009 1:26 PM, "b_s-wilk" wrote: > Did I miss something? I don't own a cell phone so I'm not real > interested in that discussion, an... Some phones have cameras on the front and back of the phone. You can do video calls if you want. That's

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

Did I miss something? I don't own a cell phone so I'm not real interested in that discussion, and I sure don't want to read the review, but is this some sort of new tech? How and why does a cell phone take pictures of itself? Some phones have cameras on the front and back of the phone. You can d

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

On Nov 7, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Tony B wrote: Did I miss something? Its strictly for narcissistic backwoods droids. * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member m

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

Keep in mind, not all android phones are equal. Verizon released two droid phones this week, the other may be closer to what you need. Some of the manufacturers like HTC and Samsung are putting front ends on android and enabling more capabilities along with the front ends. On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

If they were accurate, some of his critical comments about the Droid were useful to me. db mike wrote: A lot of what Andy does is tongue in cheek. I've listened to him for quite some time on macbreak weekly and he is an uber geek on the order of star wars/AD&D/comic book/computer gadget fan b

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

A lot of what Andy does is tongue in cheek. I've listened to him for quite some time on macbreak weekly and he is an uber geek on the order of star wars/AD&D/comic book/computer gadget fan boy. I posted the review because I thought it was one of the more fair minded ones out there. He is indeed

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

OK, that was tongue in cheek. Read the blog at http://www. *ihnatko. *com/ On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Tony B wrote: > Did I miss something? I don't own a cell phone so I'm not real > interested in that discussion, and I sure don't want to read the > review, but i

[CGUYS] droid self-photography?

Did I miss something? I don't own a cell phone so I'm not real interested in that discussion, and I sure don't want to read the review, but is this some sort of new tech? How and why does a cell phone take pictures of itself? On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 10:22 AM, John Emmerling wrote: > Finally, he is