Re: [CGUYS] Smileys Are Insulting (was RE: [CGUYS] Will iPhone Kill Radio?)

2008-07-29 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
It all depends.  In the latest release of Eudora actually done by 
Eudora, they turn into icons.


The Icons actually let you know there is something else 
there.  Otherwise I have a hard time deciphering all the punctuation 
marks, and it reminds me of reading Hebrew!


Stewart


At 10:23 AM 7/29/2008, you wrote:

Does anyone else find Smileys to be insulting?
I mean, a little :-) at the end of a comment to explain that you meant it
humorously/ironically/sarcastically implies the recipient isn't capable of
getting the joke in the first place.
Or maybe I should just switch to decaf today... ;-)

__
Michel David Lowe


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Smileys Are Insulting (was RE: [CGUYS] Will iPhone Kill Radio?)

2008-07-29 Thread Roger D. Parish

At 11:23 AM -0400 7/29/08, Michel Lowe wrote:


Does anyone else find Smileys to be insulting?
I mean, a little :-) at the end of a comment to explain that you meant it
humorously/ironically/sarcastically implies the recipient isn't capable of
getting the joke in the first place.
Or maybe I should just switch to decaf today... ;-)


Since getting the joke is in the eye of the beholder, and not 
guaranteed, that's why smileys (or emoticons) were invented in the 
first place. One's innocent little jibe might be misinterpreted by a 
reader who had not switched to decaf that day. ;-)


I, for one, don't find them insulting. I had never thought of them 
that way until you just brought it up...

paranoia
hmm, what did they really mean by that???
/paranoia

:-)
--
Roger
Lovettsville, VA


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Smileys Are Insulting (was RE: [CGUYS] Will iPhone Kill Radio?)

2008-07-29 Thread Allen Firstenberg
The problem is that often there just isn't enough context to realize
that the person is trying to be humorous/ironic/sarcastic.  In
traditional print, you'd have lots and lots of written words to
realize this.  In realspace, you can judge the body language of the
person making the statement.  In brief email exchanges, sometimes you
need substitutes for those cues - and thats the purpose of the smiley.

I don't think the assumption is that the person won't get the
joke... its to make sure that people realize it _is_ a joke.

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:23:38AM -0400, Michel Lowe wrote:
 Does anyone else find Smileys to be insulting?
 I mean, a little :-) at the end of a comment to explain that you meant it
 humorously/ironically/sarcastically implies the recipient isn't capable of
 getting the joke in the first place.
 Or maybe I should just switch to decaf today... ;-)
 
 __ 
 Michel David Lowe 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:COMPUTERGUYS-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Piwowar
  Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:49 AM
  To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
  Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Will iPhone Kill Radio?
  
  But there's a difference between mentioning problems and taking random,
  gratuitous potshots.
  
  Should it be my problem that some folks have no sense of humor? Should we
  all be required to dial down to low level gloom to accomodate the most
  morose among us? Should we be denied a good laugh at the folly of the
  ultra rich? I think not!
  
  P.S. I don't do smileys. Smileys are depressing.
 
 
 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *
 


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Smileys Are Insulting (was RE: [CGUYS] Will iPhone Kill Radio?)

2008-07-29 Thread Chris Dunford
 The problem is that often there just isn't enough context to realize
 that the person is trying to be humorous/ironic/sarcastic.  In
 traditional print, you'd have lots and lots of written words to
 realize this.  In realspace, you can judge the body language of the
 person making the statement.  In brief email exchanges, sometimes you
 need substitutes for those cues - and thats the purpose of the smiley.
 
 I don't think the assumption is that the person won't get the
 joke... its to make sure that people realize it _is_ a joke.

Yes, I think this is exactly right. Email, forums, listserv posts, IMs, and
the like lack the cues and/or the space to ensure that the reader knows
you're joking.  I resisted emoticons for many years before I came (somewhat
reluctantly) to this conclusion.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Smileys Are Insulting (was RE: [CGUYS] Will iPhone Kill Radio?)

2008-07-29 Thread John DeCarlo
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Chris Dunford [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

  The problem is that often there just isn't enough context to realize
  that the person is trying to be humorous/ironic/sarcastic.  In

 Yes, I think this is exactly right. Email, forums, listserv posts, IMs, and
 the like lack the cues and/or the space to ensure that the reader knows
 you're joking.  I resisted emoticons for many years before I came (somewhat
 reluctantly) to this conclusion.


I mostly resisted emoticons because of the need to memorize them and their
interpretations.

So for years I did things like this:  wink, grin, rant mode onrant
mode off.

I still prefer that approach, but no one likes to type any more.

Agree that icons make it a little easier, but they go overboard, too - what
does the smiley face with a hat on at a rakish angle mean about the text
just preceeding it?

angry old curmudgeon mode off

-- 
John DeCarlo, My Views Are My Own


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Smileys Are Insulting (was RE: [CGUYS] Will iPhone Kill Radio?)

2008-07-29 Thread Allen Firstenberg
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:38:09PM -0400, John DeCarlo wrote:

 Agree that icons make it a little easier, but they go overboard, too - what
 does the smiley face with a hat on at a rakish angle mean about the text
 just preceeding it?

That the author is trying, and failing, to be cute.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Smileys Are Insulting (was RE: [CGUYS] Will iPhone Kill Radio?)

2008-07-29 Thread Paula Minor

Does anyone else find Smileys to be insulting?
I mean, a little :-) at the end of a comment to explain that you  
meant it
humorously/ironically/sarcastically implies the recipient isn't  
capable of

getting the joke in the first place.
Or maybe I should just switch to decaf today... ;-)

Yep, you should switch.  Smiley's don't bother me at all.  It's way  
too easy to misread someone's intent when they are using 'dry'  
humor ,etc, because you can't see their body language.  The smiley's  
do help keep the intent clear.


Paula
US/IN
raven880atindy.net
I'm now at the age where I've got to prove that I'm just as good as I  
never was.Rex Harrison







*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*