Q for Next Year's Exam?

2003-07-25 Thread Jonathan H. Adler
Rep. Hoestetler (R-IN) has issued a press release claiming the House adopted amendments to the judicial appropriations bill that "would block federal funds from being used to enforce court decisions that found the use of 'under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional and ordered the

Re: Q for Next Year's Exam?

2003-07-25 Thread Jonathan L. Entin
A practical question for Marty Laderman: Does DOJ have other sources of funding for its activities beyond the regular appropriations bill that passed the House with those riders? (BTW, they are in sections 803 and 808 of H.R. 2799, the House-passed Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State,

Re: Q for Next Year's Exam?

2003-07-25 Thread Marty Lederman
Unfortunately, now that I've been out of the Department awhileI no longer know such things with any degree of specificity or assurance. However, I believethe Department has historically construed such appropriations riders extremely narrowly, or literally, to permit the Department to expend

Inquiry

2003-07-25 Thread Robert Bradley
Hello: Recently, I was asked a question that I thought some on this list might find interesting. If you were given the power to add a single amendment to the U.S. Constitution, what would it be and why? Responses can be sent directly to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. Bob

Re: Inquiry

2003-07-25 Thread Robert Justin Lipkin
Dear Bob: My choice would be this: A proposed amendment to the Constitution is ratified after a majority of the electorate in two consecutive presidential elections vote for it. Best, Bobby Bobby Lipkin Widener University School of Law Delaware