The discussion is interesting, and now the facts have change materially.
Mark adds, in part: "...Melzer associates with other pedophiles; he edited a publication that gave advice on how to seduce children, and that urged pedophiles to keep their activities secret and not to answer any police
As a follow up, I lost track of the arguments
posted about a year ago in favor of the government's requiring libraries and
booksellers to disclose information about an individual's reading
choices. As I recall, there were a number of people suggesting "you are
what you read" and therefore
Yes, that would have been a very different
case. In fact, the Second Circuit opinion states that "Melzer is a self
described pedophile and admits to being sexually attracted to young males up to
the age of 16." If the school had fired him because of his sexual desires,
presumably there
