Yes, that would have been a very different
case. In fact, the Second Circuit opinion states that "Melzer is a self
described pedophile and admits to being sexually attracted to young males up to
the age of 16." If the school had fired him because of his sexual desires,
presumably there would be no First Amendment issue here. But it
didn't. There was no evidence that Melzer engaged in any illegal or
inapproriate conduct at Bronx Science in his 31 years teaching there.
Presumably for this reason, among others, a School Board Report appears to have
concluded that Melzer was not a risk to sexually abuse his students. 196
F. Supp. 2d at 241. Thus, the district court concluded that "Melzer was terminated solely because his employer reasonably
believed that the public exposure of his associational activities outside of the
workplace as a member of NAMBLA was likely to impair Melzer's effectiveness as a
teacher and cause internal disruption if he were returned to the
classroom." Id. at 245. There does not appear to have been any
dispute in the court of appeals that Melzer was fired because of his First
Amendment activities, rather than because of his sexual
desires.
Marty
----- Original Message -----
|
- Re: Membership in Disfavored Organization as Grounds for ... David Bernstein
- Re: Membership in Disfavored Organization as Grounds ... Marty Lederman
- Re: Membership in Disfavored Organization as Grounds ... David Bernstein
- Re: Membership in Disfavored Organization as Grou... Marty Lederman
- Re: Membership in Disfavored Organization as Grounds ... Robert Sheridan
- Re: Membership in Disfavored Organization as Grounds ... Robin Charlow
- Re: Membership in Disfavored Organization as Grounds ... Robert Sheridan
- Fw: Re: Membership in Disfavored Organization as... Lynne Henderson