2012/5/17 Karl Wright
> Looks like I don't have permissions to do this. I suppose I would
> need to open an infra ticket?
>
Yes, I think so.
Tommaso
> Karl
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Heads up: Now that we've graduated, I'd like to move the rep
Thanks and congratulations to you all for this great achievement !
Cheers
Tommaso
2012/5/16 Piergiorgio Lucidi
> Hi Karl,
>
> this is a great news!
>
> Congratulations for all the people that contributed on the project, this is
> a very important step!
>
> Thank you all!
>
> Cheers,
> Piergiorgi
rsons listed immediately below be and hereby
> are
> >appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache ManifoldCF
> >Project:
> >
> >* Shinichiro Abe (shinich...@apache.org)
> >* Erlend Garåsen(rid...@apache.org)
> >
+1
Cheers,
Tommaso
2012/4/25 Jukka Zitting
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> > Please vote +1 if you think we should propose to the Incubator that we
> > graduate as a top level project at this time.
>
> +1
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
so it would be
> appropriate, I think.
>
+1 just since that needs to be explicitly figured out we need that at least
the PPMC is aware and happy with that.
Tommaso
>
> Karl
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Tommaso Teofili
> wrote:
> > Hi Karl,
> > I think
Hi Karl,
I think times are mature for talking about graduation, it may be helpful to
explicitly get through the graduation requirements [1][2] and open a
[DISCUSSION] thread before start voting to check everyone is happy with it
and also, for example, to choose the right target (TLP or subproject).
big +1.
Tommaso
2012/4/11 Karl Wright
> Folks,
>
> When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our
> binary dependencies are "stuck" without fixes or upgrades because we
> are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the community
> whether everyone thinks we should
Hi Karl,
I'm trying to catch up all the points raised in the general@ thread in
order to better understand them and what we actually need (not) to do.
Will come back on this as soon as I can with more comments.
Tommaso
2012/3/28 Karl Wright
> Dear Developers,
>
> In case you haven't been follo
sounds good, thanks Karl (signed it off now).
Tommaso
2012/2/27 Karl Wright
> I've edited the Wiki page accordingly, and now wait for a mentor signature.
>
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
> wrote:
> > Hi Karl,
> >
> > it's ok for me, thank you for writing the repo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13200692#comment-13200692
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on CONNECTORS-288:
Nice thing Luce, loo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13200692#comment-13200692
]
Tommaso Teofili edited comment on CONNECTORS-288 at 2/5/12 8:3
Hi all
2011/12/8 Karl Wright
> Hi Folks,
>
> The manifoldcf 0.4-incubating release does not include sources for the
> following components that are meant to be installed on repositories,
> in order to enable the corresponding connector:
>
> - the solr 3.x security plugin
> - the solr 4.x securit
I am taking a look at the stuff regarding licenses and the like for the
Alfresco connector (help from Jukka would be appreciated here) which I'd
like to see included in the next release.
Tommaso
2011/12/6 Karl Wright
> Hi all,
>
> I think we're just about done with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating. Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13156621#comment-13156621
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on CONNECTORS-287:
according to [1] soft
m ok for that too, on the contrary if that would affect connector
interfaces it maybe a huge work to do right now.
I'd love to hear other opinions on this and other topics as I'm sure MySQL
and UI aren't the only open points the community would like to get sorted.
Have a nice day yo
Hello Karl, all
2011/9/19 Karl Wright
> Folks,
> I'd like to begin discussion about the next release, currently labeled
> 0.4, and also our potential for graduation from the incubator. What
> I'd like is a sense of:
>
> (a) what we are still missing as far as incubator graduation is concerned,
Nope, using the maven-release-plugin [1] would be enough as it takes care of
checking/changing versions both in the dependencies (if there is any
-SNAPSHOT dependency) and in the modules' versions.
A very quickly look at the process goes like running mvn release:prepare
which signs artifact, creati
nice one Karl :)
Tommaso
2011/9/1 Karl Wright
> Here's a report proposal:
>
> ManifoldCF
>
> --Description--
>
> ManifoldCF is an incremental crawler framework and set of connectors
> designed to pull documents from various kinds of repositories into
> search engine indexes or other targets. The
Hi PJ,
your problems should be fixed now.
Cheers,
Tommaso
2011/8/30 Piergiorgio Lucidi
> Infrastructure said me that I don't have permissions to commit on Manifold
> because my account now is associated only to incubator.
>
> I forwarded to Tommaso the problem and he confirmed that last week the
I've signed off our report, thanks Karl for taking care.
Tommaso
2011/6/2 Karl Wright
> I've now edited the page accordingly. Let me know of any changes
> you'd like to see.
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Tommaso Teofili
> wrote:
> > it sou
mely helpful bug reports and
> contributions from the field.
>
> --How has the project developed since the last report?--
>
> An 0.1 release was made on January 31, 2011, and a 0.2 release
> occurred on May 17, 2011. Another release is being considered.
>
> Signed off by me
I think the successful release should be mentioned too :-)
Tommaso
2011/6/1 Karl Wright
> The March report looked like this:
>
> ManifoldCF
>
> --Description--
>
> ManifoldCF is an incremental crawler framework and set of connectors
> designed to pull documents from various kinds of repositories
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041518#comment-13041518
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on CONNECTORS-203:
as it's a wide sco
+1 (already voted on the issue)
Tommaso
2011/5/31 Koji Sekiguchi
> +1. Let's adopt 1.5 before we go TLP.
>
> koji
> --
> http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
>
>
> (11/05/31 8:32), Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> Please have a look at CONNECTORS-203 and vote +1 if you think it's
>> time to move beyond Java 1.4 a
It'd be good that all of us take a look at the Incubator graduation page
[1]. Even if that's "only" a checklist it does help us define what still has
to be done.
In my opinion, ManifoldCF has demonstrated the ability to make releases but
we should work on community growth; also diversity is an impo
xy but I
remember that was hard to maintain in a changing environment.
Let's keep the discussion and ideas flow :-)
Tommaso
[1] : http://seleniumhq.org/
>
> Koji
> --
> http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
>
>
> (11/05/17 22:10), Tommaso Teofili wrote:
>
>> Hello Kar
Hello Karl,
thanks so much again for the warm welcome and for these insights.
I agree with you that testability is a major concern we need to engage and
get sorted.
One thing I think right now is that having tests rely on a testing
infrastructure would possibly expose ManifoldCF to this issue again
Thanks all for your trust, I'll do my best to help ManifoldCF get his way
through the Incubator.
Tommaso
2011/5/16 Robert Muir
> welcome Tommaso!
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> > Please join me in thanking Tommaso for taking on this responsibility!
> >
> > Karl
> >
>
Welcome Shinichiro :-)
Tommaso
2011/5/13 Karl Wright
> Please join us in welcoming Shinichiro to the ManifoldCF team!
>
> Karl
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
