Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

2016-03-10 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 03/10/2016 03:21 PM, Pete Muir wrote: > On 10 March 2016 at 13:40, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> On 03/10/2016 01:14 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: >>> >>> I saw Pradeepto's write-up on Helm/DM, using Nulecule for the 'bundle' >>> format with AtomicApp with Helm/DM - does that

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

2016-03-10 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 03/10/2016 01:14 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: > > I saw Pradeepto's write-up on Helm/DM, using Nulecule for the 'bundle' format > with AtomicApp with Helm/DM - does that not mostly complete the picture? What exactly do you mean by 'bundle' format? Do you mean the way we are packaging things up

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

2016-03-10 Thread Carl Trieloff
On 03/10/2016 01:09 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > On 03/10/2016 11:29 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: >> On 03/10/2016 08:15 PM, Aaron Weitekamp wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Ratnadeep Debnath >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Till now, Nulecule's focus has

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

2016-03-10 Thread Lalatendu Mohanty
On 03/10/2016 11:29 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: On 03/10/2016 08:15 PM, Aaron Weitekamp wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: Hi all, Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship nested, composable multi

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

2016-03-10 Thread Lalatendu Mohanty
On 03/10/2016 08:15 PM, Aaron Weitekamp wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Ratnadeep Debnath > wrote: Hi all, Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship nested, composable multi container applications. Well,

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

2016-03-10 Thread William Henry
I still need to understand how Ansible effects the Nulecule efforts. I understood people are looking into this. Is that happening? It seems to me that there is potentially lots of overlap here. Who from Ansible, if any, is working with the Nulecule folks to make sure we aren't reinventing and

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

2016-03-10 Thread Aaron Weitekamp
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > Hi all, > > Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship > nested, composable multi container applications. Well, it helps us to > focus on a smaller problem and solve it well. This also keeps >

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

2016-03-10 Thread Pete Muir
Great idea. Let me know what you need from me to help you with this - this is my contribution priority for the next 90 days On 10 March 2016 at 04:29, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > Hi all, > > Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship > nested,

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

2016-03-10 Thread Aaron Weitekamp
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Burr Sutter wrote: > I like the proposal! :-) > > I agree we should encourage adoption, zero barriers, etc, but I think we should go in the other ​direction with the spec: - focus on the high-level definition of the application and service

Re: [Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

2016-03-10 Thread Burr Sutter
I like the proposal! :-) On Thursday, March 10, 2016, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > Hi all, > > Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship > nested, composable multi container applications. Well, it helps us to > focus on a smaller problem and solve it

[Container-tools] Rethinking Nulecule

2016-03-10 Thread Ratnadeep Debnath
Hi all, Till now, Nulecule's focus has been to be a spec to package and ship nested, composable multi container applications. Well, it helps us to focus on a smaller problem and solve it well. This also keeps implementation of Nulecule, e.g., atomicapp, lean and simple. However, is it enough?