Re: Is 1.1 trunk usable?

2006-10-26 Thread Graham Leggett
Rahul Thakur wrote: Is 1.1 trunk at a point that I can put it to use . erm . in production? I built it from source, and deployed it within tomcat as a war - it's up and running, but not doing anything yet awaiting a move from vss to subversion, but so far so good... Regards,

Re: Is 1.1 trunk usable?

2006-10-26 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 10/26/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is 1.1 trunk at a point that I can put it to use . erm . in production? Well, I *was* going to say I'm running it straight from a svn checkout, but now it won't build. I thought it was CONTINUUM-970, but that's closed.

Re: Is 1.1 trunk usable?

2006-10-26 Thread Jesse McConnell
and its been fixed up now :) On 10/26/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/26/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is 1.1 trunk at a point that I can put it to use . erm . in production? Well, I *was* going to say I'm running it straight from a svn checkout, but now

Re: Is 1.1 trunk usable?

2006-10-26 Thread Rahul Thakur
For now 1.0.3 is giving me enough 'heartburn' ;-( I just want something that works , i.e, lets me add a project and builds on schedule... nothing fancy really. Cheers, Rahul Jesse McConnell wrote: as a critical 'OMG we're all going to die if this goes down' app, I would hesitate.. but

Re: Is 1.1 trunk usable?

2006-10-26 Thread Jesse McConnell
then you can get away with running continuum trunk I think, you'll at least get the chance to have johnny on the spot fixed committed and available :P jesse On 10/26/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For now 1.0.3 is giving me enough 'heartburn' ;-( I just want something that works ,