what are your errors?
On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all
All the best wishes for 2007!
Last year I tried to do some work on continuum. But my checkout of the head
failed to build successfully.
Then I tried to checkout 1.0.3 but that also failed. Is there something
Continuum-core fails 1 testcase with 2 errors.
---
Test set:
org.apache.maven.continuum.project.builder.maven.MavenTwoContinuumProjectBuilderTest
updated trunk builds cleanly for me right now...
what o/s jdk and mvn version are you using?
and are you sure you don't have local modifications
jesse
On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Continuum-core fails 1 testcase with 2 errors.
On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a clean checkout of the trunk, running on XP with JDK 1.5.0_06 and maven
2.0.4
It also builds fine here on WinXP, JDK 1.5.0_10 and Maven 2.0.4 or
2.0.5-SNAPSHOT.
(However, I've seen odd intermittent problems before, especially on
Svn is 1.3.1
Roald Bankras
Software Engineer
JTeam b.v.
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Lach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:37 PM
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Building continuum
What is the svn version you are using? Every attempt I
I don't have objections but I think we can do the same thing for m1 and ant
projects.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
There is a proposal to add the following properties for continuum to
pass to m2 builds:
properties.setProperty(continuum.project.group.name,
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi Jesse,
I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a good
feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now?
It was submitted by John Didion - John, are you hanging around? Are you
able to help get that applied and work through some of
That make sense to me...
On 1/2/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have objections but I think we can do the same thing for m1 and
ant projects.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
There is a proposal to add the following properties for continuum to
pass to m2 builds:
I've updated to svn 1.4.2 and jdk 1.5.0_10, but still the same failure.
Are there additional environment variable required?
Roald Bankras
Software Engineer
JTeam b.v.
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:31 PM
To:
I've gotten past the svn problem by installing version 1.4.0 (I was using
svn installed with cygwin). Now I'm getting the DataManagermentToolTest
failure in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1092 . I'm running jdk
1.4.1_07 - I'll try it with 1.5.0_04
On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras [EMAIL
Nope - same failure with 1.5.0
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've gotten past the svn problem by installing version 1.4.0 (I was using
svn installed with cygwin). Now I'm getting the DataManagermentToolTest
failure in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1092 . I'm
Done. Also - opened the file (by accident) with notepad and it looks like
the differences are in the line terminators. Added that to the issue also.
Hope it helps.
On 1/2/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope - same failure with
I haven't been able to find a cookbook for this yet. Does anyone have one?
Thanks. I've put in what I've already tried. I've also indicated that this
is a work-in-process and may not yet be successful.
On 1/2/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been able to find a cookbook for this yet. Does anyone
Great - can the patch be used as a starting point?
On 03/01/2007, at 2:27 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi Jesse,
I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a
good feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now?
It was submitted by John
Yeah. But to have truly pluggable persistence, then we end up having to
pick LCD features. For isntance, if we want JDO, iBatis, and
JPA/Hibernate as possible approaches, then our design has to pretty much
ignore transparent relationship manifestation that JPA/hibernate/Toplink
provide.
Sorry, I was writing my post when this came in. I'm in general
agreement, and while I do think moving to something more than JDO is
important, Brett is right, the use of hte store could use a good audit
and re-factor. Probably some of the problems of strange access
approaches used currently
On 2 Jan 07, at 10:59 PM 2 Jan 07, Brett Porter wrote:
I've been thinking stay with JDO for now, look at JPA in the long
term.
I think anyone who wanted to look at an iBatis store I say go for it.
JDO is not bad, but JPOX has proven to be less then robust. If we
were using Kodo it
18 matches
Mail list logo
