I don't know yet if we must add the second part in a second beta or in 1.2.
The first part will change the database and the second part too. We'll need a migration tool between between actual db and first part and an other between first part and second part. Maybe we can
change all db things in t
Yes, I'll change installations screens to define the installation type.
environment variables will be added too.
Emmanuel
LAMY Olivier a écrit :
Hi,
Very nice idea.
Just some remarks concerning the actual continuum model.
Builder and Jdk have the same type (Installation), I think this must
Emm, as we talked about on irc...
I think if we get the first part of this done in the next month then
the next alpha-release should be beta-1, with maybe a beta-2 a couple
of weeks after that and then get this thing out the door and released.
We have a lot on board for 1.2 and we can't really g
Hi,
Very nice idea.
Just some remarks concerning the actual continuum model.
Builder and Jdk have the same type (Installation), I think this must be
splitted in two types in order to prevent user to add a Builder as a Jdk
(screen [1]) when they build a profile.
Then it could be nice to can ad
Hi,
I wrote a little doc (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/CI+profiles)
about what I think we need to implement to add profiles in Continum.
I don't think we can implement all features in 1.1 because it's a big work.
The work can be split like that:
1.1: add installation screens, bas
