I'll create some examples asap.
Emmanuel
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Some code using a couple of Entities as examples would be nice :-)
I still think the API would be verbose.
Thanks,
Rahul
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Emmanuel
thx Rahul for this link.
We are #2 now :)
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Any one seen this:
http://www.wakaleo.com/polls/18-what-continuous-integration-server-are-you-using-in-2008
Another 5 steps to get to #1
:-)
Rahul
The users one seems to be missing the users. prefix in both - is there
a reason for that?
- Brett
On 29/02/2008, at 8:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Thu Feb 28 13:58:44 2008
New Revision: 632127
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=632127view=rev
Log:
Update
This has been done (and switch works just fine). No other changes
should be needed on your end.
- Brett
On 26/02/2008, at 12:02 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Emmanuel Venisse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created the svn group with all pmc members. The next step will
yes, it is an error.
Emmanuel
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The users one seems to be missing the users. prefix in both - is there
a reason for that?
- Brett
On 29/02/2008, at 8:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Thu Feb
Thanks Brett.
Emmanuel
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has been done (and switch works just fine). No other changes
should be needed on your end.
- Brett
On 26/02/2008, at 12:02 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:39 PM,
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on
a branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each, and
none merged to the other.
Can I suggest we merge all branch changes to trunk, rename trunk to
1.2-SNAPSHOT, and the branch to continuum-1.1.x
why 1.1.x?
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on
a branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each, and
none merged to the other.
Can I suggest we merge all branch
On 29/02/2008, at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
why 1.1.x?
in case there was a bugfix release on 1.1? I thought that was what the
branch was for... maintenance of 1.1.
or is there going to be 2 completely different strands of development?
- Brett
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:45 PM,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/02/2008, at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
why 1.1.x?
in case there was a bugfix release on 1.1? I thought that was what the
branch was for... maintenance of 1.1.
or is there going to be 2 completely
10 matches
Mail list logo
