I'll create some examples asap.
Emmanuel
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some code using a couple of Entities as examples would be nice :-)
>
> I still think the API would be verbose.
>
> Thanks,
> Rahul
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:06 PM, E
Hi,
Some code using a couple of Entities as examples would be nice :-)
I still think the API would be verbose.
Thanks,
Rahul
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Emmanuel Venisse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >> 2) Criteria vs Named Queries: I am not convinced (yet) that Named
> >> queries are the way to go. I did some digging around, they are indeed
> >> best practices for JPA but I think the decision merits other
> >> con
2) Criteria vs Named Queries: I am not convinced (yet) that Named
queries are the way to go. I did some digging around, they are indeed
best practices for JPA but I think the decision merits other
consideration(s). I still believe the Criteria Queries will help us
define a cleaner Store interf
As I already explained, I'm in favor of named queries
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to go ahead and pick up something towards the next Continuum
> iteration. I am thinking refactoring ContinuumStore interface as was
> earlier discussed
Hi,
I'd like to go ahead and pick up something towards the next Continuum
iteration. I am thinking refactoring ContinuumStore interface as was
earlier discussed on this list and as I did on the 'continuum-jpa'
branch.
To this end, I need to get a clear picture on a few items:
1) Which JPA prov
