On 2 Jan 07, at 10:59 PM 2 Jan 07, Brett Porter wrote:
I've been thinking stay with JDO for now, look at JPA in the long
term.
I think anyone who wanted to look at an iBatis store I say go for it.
JDO is not bad, but JPOX has proven to be less then robust. If we
were using Kodo it woul
- Original Message -
From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0
I've been thinking stay with JDO for now, look at JPA in the long
term.
I haven't used iBatis, and would be happy to hear some
Sorry, I was writing my post when this came in. I'm in general
agreement, and while I do think moving to something more than JDO is
important, Brett is right, the use of hte store could use a good audit
and re-factor. Probably some of the problems of strange access
approaches used currently c
Yeah. But to have truly pluggable persistence, then we end up having to
pick LCD features. For isntance, if we want JDO, iBatis, and
JPA/Hibernate as possible approaches, then our design has to pretty much
ignore transparent relationship manifestation that JPA/hibernate/Toplink
provide. True
Great - can the patch be used as a starting point?
On 03/01/2007, at 2:27 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi Jesse,
I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a
good feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now?
It was submitted by John Di
Thanks. I've put in what I've already tried. I've also indicated that this
is a work-in-process and may not yet be successful.
On 1/2/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't been able to find a cookbook for this yet. Does any
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't been able to find a cookbook for this yet. Does anyone have one?
Not that I know of, but I created a page so we can keep notes:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+JBoss
I'm not familiar with JBoss, but ju
I haven't been able to find a cookbook for this yet. Does anyone have one?
Done. Also - opened the file (by accident) with notepad and it looks like
the differences are in the line terminators. Added that to the issue also.
Hope it helps.
On 1/2/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope - same failure with
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nope - same failure with 1.5.0
Please comment on the issue so we know it's still a problem for someone.
If you just need to get it to build, you can skip the tests with:
-Dmaven.test.skip=true
--
Wendy
Nope - same failure with 1.5.0
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've gotten past the svn problem by installing version 1.4.0 (I was using
svn installed with cygwin). Now I'm getting the DataManagermentToolTest
failure in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1092 . I'm r
I've gotten past the svn problem by installing version 1.4.0 (I was using
svn installed with cygwin). Now I'm getting the DataManagermentToolTest
failure in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1092 . I'm running jdk
1.4.1_07 - I'll try it with 1.5.0_04
On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras <[EMAIL PRO
I've updated to svn 1.4.2 and jdk 1.5.0_10, but still the same failure.
Are there additional environment variable required?
Roald Bankras
Software Engineer
JTeam b.v.
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:31 PM
To: continuum-dev
Also - B. De Mezzo in a separate email was asking for a continuum version of
basedir - I think adding that would be a good idea. Here's relevant text
from the email.
I am looking for a property to pass througth maven to get the absolute
path location of the current build working directory.
That make sense to me...
On 1/2/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't have objections but I think we can do the same thing for m1 and
ant projects.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> There is a proposal to add the following properties for continuum to
> pass to m2 bui
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi Jesse,
I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a good
feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now?
It was submitted by John Didion - John, are you hanging around? Are you
able to help get that applied and work through some of th
+1 Just what I was waiting for.
Roald Bankras
Software Engineer
JTeam b.v.
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:21 PM
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: CONTINUUM-990: New properties to pass to m2 builds from C
I don't have objections but I think we can do the same thing for m1 and ant
projects.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
There is a proposal to add the following properties for continuum to
pass to m2 builds:
properties.setProperty("continuum.project.group.name",
project.getProjectGroup(
Svn is 1.3.1
Roald Bankras
Software Engineer
JTeam b.v.
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Lach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:37 PM
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Building continuum
What is the svn version you are using? Every attempt I ma
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the svn version you are using? Every attempt I make fails during
svn unit test.
I'm using the Windows binaries, version 1.4.0 r21228
--
Wendy
What is the svn version you are using? Every attempt I make fails during
svn unit test.
On 1/2/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a clean checkout of the trunk, running on XP with JDK 1.5.0_06and maven
2.0.4
It also builds
On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a clean checkout of the trunk, running on XP with JDK 1.5.0_06 and maven
2.0.4
It also builds fine here on WinXP, JDK 1.5.0_10 and Maven 2.0.4 or
2.0.5-SNAPSHOT.
(However, I've seen odd intermittent problems before, especially on Win
I have a clean checkout of the trunk, running on XP with JDK 1.5.0_06 and maven
2.0.4
Roald Bankras
Software Engineer
JTeam b.v.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 2:26 PM
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: B
updated trunk builds cleanly for me right now...
what o/s jdk and mvn version are you using?
and are you sure you don't have local modifications
jesse
On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Continuum-core fails 1 testcase with 2 errors.
-
Continuum-core fails 1 testcase with 2 errors.
---
Test set:
org.apache.maven.continuum.project.builder.maven.MavenTwoContinuumProjectBuilderTest
--
what are your errors?
On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all
All the best wishes for 2007!
Last year I tried to do some work on continuum. But my checkout of the head
failed to build successfully.
Then I tried to checkout 1.0.3 but that also failed. Is there something
sp
26 matches
Mail list logo