Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-02 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 2 Jan 07, at 10:59 PM 2 Jan 07, Brett Porter wrote: I've been thinking stay with JDO for now, look at JPA in the long term. I think anyone who wanted to look at an iBatis store I say go for it. JDO is not bad, but JPOX has proven to be less then robust. If we were using Kodo it woul

Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-02 Thread Rahul Thakur
- Original Message - From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:59 PM Subject: Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0 I've been thinking stay with JDO for now, look at JPA in the long term. I haven't used iBatis, and would be happy to hear some

Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-02 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Sorry, I was writing my post when this came in. I'm in general agreement, and while I do think moving to something more than JDO is important, Brett is right, the use of hte store could use a good audit and re-factor. Probably some of the problems of strange access approaches used currently c

Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0

2007-01-02 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Yeah. But to have truly pluggable persistence, then we end up having to pick LCD features. For isntance, if we want JDO, iBatis, and JPA/Hibernate as possible approaches, then our design has to pretty much ignore transparent relationship manifestation that JPA/hibernate/Toplink provide. True

Re: CONTINUUM-798: module discovery

2007-01-02 Thread Brett Porter
Great - can the patch be used as a starting point? On 03/01/2007, at 2:27 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Brett Porter a écrit : Hi Jesse, I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a good feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now? It was submitted by John Di

Re: How to install continuum 1.1 on jboss 4.0.x?

2007-01-02 Thread Thierry Lach
Thanks. I've put in what I've already tried. I've also indicated that this is a work-in-process and may not yet be successful. On 1/2/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't been able to find a cookbook for this yet. Does any

Re: How to install continuum 1.1 on jboss 4.0.x?

2007-01-02 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't been able to find a cookbook for this yet. Does anyone have one? Not that I know of, but I created a page so we can keep notes: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+JBoss I'm not familiar with JBoss, but ju

How to install continuum 1.1 on jboss 4.0.x?

2007-01-02 Thread Thierry Lach
I haven't been able to find a cookbook for this yet. Does anyone have one?

Re: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Thierry Lach
Done. Also - opened the file (by accident) with notepad and it looks like the differences are in the line terminators. Added that to the issue also. Hope it helps. On 1/2/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope - same failure with

Re: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nope - same failure with 1.5.0 Please comment on the issue so we know it's still a problem for someone. If you just need to get it to build, you can skip the tests with: -Dmaven.test.skip=true -- Wendy

Re: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Thierry Lach
Nope - same failure with 1.5.0 On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've gotten past the svn problem by installing version 1.4.0 (I was using svn installed with cygwin). Now I'm getting the DataManagermentToolTest failure in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1092 . I'm r

Re: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Thierry Lach
I've gotten past the svn problem by installing version 1.4.0 (I was using svn installed with cygwin). Now I'm getting the DataManagermentToolTest failure in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1092 . I'm running jdk 1.4.1_07 - I'll try it with 1.5.0_04 On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras <[EMAIL PRO

RE: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Roald Bankras
I've updated to svn 1.4.2 and jdk 1.5.0_10, but still the same failure. Are there additional environment variable required? Roald Bankras Software Engineer JTeam b.v. -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:31 PM To: continuum-dev

Re: CONTINUUM-990: New properties to pass to m2 builds from Continuum?

2007-01-02 Thread Thierry Lach
Also - B. De Mezzo in a separate email was asking for a continuum version of basedir - I think adding that would be a good idea. Here's relevant text from the email. I am looking for a property to pass througth maven to get the absolute path location of the current build working directory.

Re: CONTINUUM-990: New properties to pass to m2 builds from Continuum?

2007-01-02 Thread Thierry Lach
That make sense to me... On 1/2/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't have objections but I think we can do the same thing for m1 and ant projects. Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : > Hi, > > There is a proposal to add the following properties for continuum to > pass to m2 bui

Re: CONTINUUM-798: module discovery

2007-01-02 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Brett Porter a écrit : Hi Jesse, I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a good feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now? It was submitted by John Didion - John, are you hanging around? Are you able to help get that applied and work through some of th

RE: CONTINUUM-990: New properties to pass to m2 builds from Continuum?

2007-01-02 Thread Roald Bankras
+1 Just what I was waiting for. Roald Bankras Software Engineer JTeam b.v. -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:21 PM To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: CONTINUUM-990: New properties to pass to m2 builds from C

Re: CONTINUUM-990: New properties to pass to m2 builds from Continuum?

2007-01-02 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
I don't have objections but I think we can do the same thing for m1 and ant projects. Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : Hi, There is a proposal to add the following properties for continuum to pass to m2 builds: properties.setProperty("continuum.project.group.name", project.getProjectGroup(

RE: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Roald Bankras
Svn is 1.3.1 Roald Bankras Software Engineer JTeam b.v. -Original Message- From: Thierry Lach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:37 PM To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Building continuum What is the svn version you are using? Every attempt I ma

Re: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/2/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is the svn version you are using? Every attempt I make fails during svn unit test. I'm using the Windows binaries, version 1.4.0 r21228 -- Wendy

Re: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Thierry Lach
What is the svn version you are using? Every attempt I make fails during svn unit test. On 1/2/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a clean checkout of the trunk, running on XP with JDK 1.5.0_06and maven 2.0.4 It also builds

Re: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a clean checkout of the trunk, running on XP with JDK 1.5.0_06 and maven 2.0.4 It also builds fine here on WinXP, JDK 1.5.0_10 and Maven 2.0.4 or 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT. (However, I've seen odd intermittent problems before, especially on Win

RE: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Roald Bankras
I have a clean checkout of the trunk, running on XP with JDK 1.5.0_06 and maven 2.0.4 Roald Bankras Software Engineer JTeam b.v. -Original Message- From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 2:26 PM To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: B

Re: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Jesse McConnell
updated trunk builds cleanly for me right now... what o/s jdk and mvn version are you using? and are you sure you don't have local modifications jesse On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Continuum-core fails 1 testcase with 2 errors. -

RE: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Roald Bankras
Continuum-core fails 1 testcase with 2 errors. --- Test set: org.apache.maven.continuum.project.builder.maven.MavenTwoContinuumProjectBuilderTest --

Re: Building continuum

2007-01-02 Thread Jesse McConnell
what are your errors? On 1/2/07, Roald Bankras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey all All the best wishes for 2007! Last year I tried to do some work on continuum. But my checkout of the head failed to build successfully. Then I tried to checkout 1.0.3 but that also failed. Is there something sp