Brett Porter wrote:
I've turned off the CI build for continuum-1.0.x, since the development
focus will all be on trunk now.
I'm not sure if we should svn rm the branch to save confusion, or move
it, or just leave it there. Any thoughts?
I'd prefer to leave it, at least for a while, as
I think we'll can remove it when trunk will be in a stable state. I'm not agree to remove the more
stable branch even if it isn't the development branch.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
I've turned off the CI build for continuum-1.0.x, since the development
focus will all be on trunk now.
Brett Porter wrote:
Yep, I agree with you both. Perhaps removing it after the 1.1 release is
the most appropriate.
+1, and include the last known rev in the README.txt :)
--
Trygve
theoretically it shouldn't have changed since the last tag :)
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
Yep, I agree with you both. Perhaps removing it after the 1.1 release
is the most appropriate.
+1, and include the last known rev in the README.txt :)
--
Trygve
--
Brett Porter
Please don't remove the branch, as I'm making some local fixes on it. I
would End-of-life (remove) the branch once you have released 1.1.x
Regards,
Christian.
christian gruber + agile coach and architect
Israfil Consulting Services Corporation
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] + bus +1 (905) 6401119
Speaking of, the 1.1 feature set looks to resolve most of the current issues
we have with daily use of Continuum. Do the developers have any sense of
when we might be able to expect a 1.1 release? I don't mean to pressure,
and I'm not relying on any particular answer, but it would help us know
All the integration tests are failing. Is this simply because they rely
on the old webapp?
What needs to happen to get this working again?
- Brett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/logs/trunk/continuum-build-log-20060529.22.txt
--
Brett Porter
