Re: Continuum update

2008-01-29 Thread Rahul Thakur
I'll try to send at the same time my ideas for 2.x so we'll can discuss about them. Can't wait for 2.x design discussions to kick off :-) Cheers, Rahul Emmanuel

Re: Continuum update

2008-01-24 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
The continuuum-1.x is created Emmanuel On Jan 21, 2008 11:08 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'll probably create a new branch for 1.x dev and will reserve the trunk > for 2.x dev. I think I'll do it this week or the next (if you're agree, of > course :) ) > > I'll try

Re: Continuum update

2008-01-22 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, +1 We could release a 1.2 bug fixes because currently they are some blocking issues. -- Olivier 2008/1/21, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I'll probably create a new branch for 1.x dev and will reserve the trunk for > 2.x dev. I think I'll do it this week or the next (if you'

Re: Continuum update

2008-01-21 Thread Rahul Thakur
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I'll probably create a new branch for 1.x dev and will reserve the trunk for 2.x dev. I think I'll do it this week or the next (if you're agree, of course :) ) +1 I'll try to send at the same time my ideas for 2.x so we'll can discuss about them. +1. I think

Re: Continuum update

2008-01-21 Thread Jesse McConnell
along these lines I released the 1.0 for redback this weekend (including configuration web page!) and am setting up a similar 1.0.x branch for it so continuum and the other projects using it can maintain fixes as needed. http://archive.redback.codehaus.org/dev/a43524d00801201757r2fa2d7d8h51de14d3d

Continuum update

2008-01-21 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Hi, I'll probably create a new branch for 1.x dev and will reserve the trunk for 2.x dev. I think I'll do it this week or the next (if you're agree, of course :) ) I'll try to send at the same time my ideas for 2.x so we'll can discuss about them. Emmanuel

Re: svn commit: r479498 - in /maven/continuum/trunk: ./ continuum-cc/ continuum-distributed/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-cc/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-distributed/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-update

2006-11-27 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 27 Nov 06, at 3:48 AM 27 Nov 06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: It's isn't an old module but a not used module, so it should be in sandbox. That's not true, but as I told Brett I will work sync my stuff back into the sandbox and integrate it later. Jason. Emmanuel Jason van Zyl a écrit :

Re: svn commit: r479498 - in /maven/continuum/trunk: ./ continuum-cc/ continuum-distributed/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-cc/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-distributed/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-update

2006-11-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
It's isn't an old module but a not used module, so it should be in sandbox. Emmanuel Jason van Zyl a écrit : continuum-distributed is not an old module, please put that one back. Jason. On 26 Nov 06, at 9:54 PM 26 Nov 06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: brett Date: Sun Nov 26 18:54:54 2006

Re: svn commit: r479498 - in /maven/continuum/trunk: ./ continuum-cc/ continuum-distributed/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-cc/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-distributed/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-update

2006-11-26 Thread Brett Porter
erm, I meant 'currently unused', not 'old'. Obviously, we want most of these to be integrated into the project, but I'm just cleaning trunk up to be the code that is actually used in the release for now. On 27/11/2006, at 1:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: brett Date: Sun Nov 26 18:5