Re: [controller-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ?

2018-06-08 Thread Tom Pantelis
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Tom Pantelis > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Anil Vishnoi >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Tom Pantelis >>> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at

Re: [controller-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ?

2018-06-08 Thread Robert Varga
On 08/06/18 23:02, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > > All yang notifications are local - not sure what you mean by routed.  > > ​ I mean, like we route RPC's, i was wondering if you are building > something that will route the yang notification as well to other node.​ >   Not until someone implements

Re: [controller-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ?

2018-06-08 Thread Anil Vishnoi
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Tom Pantelis wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Anil Vishnoi > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Tom Pantelis >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Michael Vorburger >>> wrote: >>> Robert, just to

Re: [controller-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ?

2018-06-08 Thread Anil Vishnoi
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Tom Pantelis wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Michael Vorburger > wrote: > >> Robert, >> >> just to avoid any misunderstandings and unnecessary extra work to throw >> away, may we double check and confirm that we correctly understand your >> comment

Re: [controller-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ?

2018-06-08 Thread Tom Pantelis
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Michael Vorburger wrote: > Tom, > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Tom Pantelis > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Michael Vorburger >> wrote: >> >>> Robert, >>> >>> just to avoid any misunderstandings and unnecessary extra work to throw >>> away,

Re: [controller-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ?

2018-06-08 Thread Michael Vorburger
Tom, On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Tom Pantelis wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Michael Vorburger > wrote: > >> Robert, >> >> just to avoid any misunderstandings and unnecessary extra work to throw >> away, may we double check and confirm that we correctly understand your >> comment

Re: [controller-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ?

2018-06-08 Thread Michael Vorburger
Hi Robert, On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Robert Varga wrote: > On 07/06/18 19:14, Michael Vorburger wrote: > > Robert, > > > > just to avoid any misunderstandings and unnecessary extra work to throw > > away, may we double check and confirm that we correctly understand your > > comment in

Re: [controller-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ?

2018-06-07 Thread Robert Varga
On 07/06/18 19:14, Michael Vorburger wrote: > Robert, > > just to avoid any misunderstandings and unnecessary extra work to throw > away, may we double check and confirm that we correctly understand your > comment in  https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/GENIUS-138 to mean that > we are past the

Re: [controller-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ?

2018-06-07 Thread Tom Pantelis
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Michael Vorburger wrote: > Robert, > > just to avoid any misunderstandings and unnecessary extra work to throw > away, may we double check and confirm that we correctly understand your > comment in https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/GENIUS-138 to mean that > we

[controller-dev] OK to resurrect c/64522 to first move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius to controller, and then improve it for GENIUS-138 ?

2018-06-07 Thread Michael Vorburger
Robert, just to avoid any misunderstandings and unnecessary extra work to throw away, may we double check and confirm that we correctly understand your comment in https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/GENIUS-138 to mean that we are past the "dependency of a mature project on an incubation