Re: [controller-dev] deprecating the config subsystem in Carbon?

2016-11-16 Thread Colin Dixon
That sounds good to me. What's the right way for us to "deprecate" the config subsystem. I guess the simplest thing would be add an @deprecated decorator to the relevant classes that get generated with a pointer to the docs on how to migrate. --Colin On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:07 PM, FREEMAN,

Re: [controller-dev] deprecating the config subsystem in Carbon?

2016-11-16 Thread Ryan Goulding
You mean the Provider? Most people adapt the Provider and put it in src/ anyway; I would guess this wouldn't really raise much awareness but that is my own $0.02. The easiest path forward is probably to make sweeping announcements via email and strong suggestions in the release notes... but I

Re: [controller-dev] deprecating the config subsystem in Carbon?

2016-11-16 Thread Brady Allen Johnson
Just my 2 cents: I think Option 2 sounds very reasonable. In SFC, I think we would even be ready to completely adapt to blueprint and no longer use the config system by the completion of Carbon. Regards, Brady On 17/11/16 03:33, Colin Dixon wrote: So, even though the file is in src/ it