On 2003-06-12(Thu) 13:15:11 +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:39, Gary L. Greene wrote:
This bug is about the removal of a (albet not
recognized officiailly) democratic nation's flag from the
distribution. While this is an issue to the communist Chinese
government, I loath
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:23:48AM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:33:45PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
I still haven't managed to build samba3 on klama, and my own cooker box
is showing weird behaviour (very large binaries, until they get stripped
by rpm) (this also happens
Try:
rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__*
rpm --rebuilddb
If your rpm database is buggy, this should fix. Else, you have really double
entries in your database.
This will work as a workaround, but the rpm database should become buggy
in the first place.
Le Jeudi 12 Juin 2003 04:28, Rob Snow a écrit :
I
Le jeu 12/06/2003 à 01:09, J.A. Magallon a écrit :
On 06.11, Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:51:00 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Hi all,
this is a warning for all GNOME 2 cooker users..
Don't upgrade to ORBit2 2.7.2 until libbonobo 2.3.2 has been uploaded to
onsdagen den 11 juni 2003 21.14 skrev Evan Waite:
Hi.
Do we have any ColdFusion druids lurking in here that has gotten it to
work
under Mandrake Linux 9.x?
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
What version of Coldfusion?
I downloaded this file from their site
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 07:34, Han Boetes wrote:
1) I am not a mandrake employee.
I think that a ludicrous action like removing the Chinese flag and only
leaving the Taiwanese flag and a smart way of bringing this to the
media will give exactly
I would like to know the status of ALSA drivers in the kernel. It
displays it as being 0.9.2 but 0.9.4 is already available on the
alsa-project site. Latest one supports newer sound cards, like the new
audigy 2, terratec aureon sound cards. Is there a reason to have an
older version in the
Since a couple of weeks, some packages cannot be installed, I obtain
impossible to install message for some of them after using urpmi
--auto-select.
Is it my install or has anyone already noticed it ?
Thanks
Eric
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:00:29 -0400, David Walser wrote:
Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:43:20 -0400, David Walser a écrit :
fcrozat - are you going to have to do this again everytime you update
these packages?
I hope not..
For your sake, I hope not also :o)
These
Yea, I looked for this and that's not the case I'm in. I actually have
multiple entries for the RPMs. This made KDE unusable so I had to go in by
hand and remove the kde*3.1.1 RPMs and then go back through and re-install
the kde*3.1.2 RPMs (forced) to get a working KDE.
On Thu, 12 Jun
Yea, I looked for this and that's not the case I'm in. I actually have
multiple entries for the RPMs. This made KDE unusable so I had to go in
by hand and remove the kde*3.1.1 RPMs and then go back through and
re-install the kde*3.1.2 RPMs (forced) to get a working KDE.
removing rpm's
Some people/troll on the Mandrakeclub forum claim the mandrake-secure
kernel does not support HIGHMEM like the kernel-enterprise. Is it
possible to enable it in the kernel-secure, or to create a
kernel-secure-enterprise for that purpose ?
Moreover, more and more desktop machines have more and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 11:15, Oden Eriksson wrote:
E: php-mhash unknown-key GPG#604AA4E4
why are you actually signing these packages yourself?
- --
Regards,
Per Øyvind Karlsen
Sintrax Solutions
http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
-
torsdagen den 12 juni 2003 11.26 skrev Per Øyvind Karlsen:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 11:15, Oden Eriksson wrote:
E: php-mhash unknown-key GPG#604AA4E4
why are you actually signing these packages yourself?
Huh? That's what I've been told to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Berra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:23:48AM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
gcc-3.3-1mdk (I --force'd libgcc*, OpenOffice.org was the only dep, and
works fine). I will try downgrading to gcc from 9.1 and see if it helps.
Gwenole?
forced
Citerar Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Some people/troll on the Mandrakeclub forum claim the mandrake-secure
kernel does not support HIGHMEM like the kernel-enterprise. Is it
possible to enable it in the kernel-secure, or to create a
kernel-secure-enterprise for that purpose ?
No it
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
Well, I'm not sure but I think the latest version of gcc has messed
things up. I install kernel-source, change the one line in .config
to n,
this should be commented out (usually). I am not sure what effect n has
(it must work as well, but I never tried it).
Michael Reinsch wrote:
What is in your /etc/sysconfig/clock? UTC should not be set to true.
Nope, it's set to false. While poor at kernel compiling, I've got my
config files more or less down pat. :)
In my opinion, if this is something that's broken at kernel config
level, no band-aid fixes
Since the official MDK 9.1 update kernel still lacks some features,
I decided to add some of them myself with the following changes:
- Keep version/release to not breake 3:rd party modules / addons...
- My latest vesafb patch that you can find in 2.4.21-rc7-ac1
- nForce2 UDMA/133 reporting (but
Le mer 11/06/2003 à 22:19, Jason Straight a écrit :
I now also checked every package that owns a lib ldd listed konqueror and
kioslave and kio_thumbnail.so all turned up clean with rpm -V. I have no idea
why this happens if others aren't seeing it.
I've got the same problem too !
--- Il
I will not continue this conversation any further, if it's
wished. However, I want the input of the cooker community about
this.
--
Until there is evidence that the country is GONE leave the Flag/ Settings in
(you do run
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Is this the same thing I'm seeing with Mesa (hasn't been
rebuilding since gcc 3.3):
http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/i586/problem/Mesa-5.0.1-3mdk
gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i586 -mcpu=pentiumpro -g -march=pentium
Le jeu 12/06/2003 à 07:34, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
no, png file has moved into gnome-icon-theme package..
as this screenshot and launch command icon miss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -q gnome-icon-theme gnome-panel
gnome-icon-theme-1.0.5-1mdk
gnome-panel-2.3.0-1mdk
From ~.xsession-errors
Frank Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trying to build ISO images from today's cooker, I'm getting: URPM object version
0.90 does not match bootstrap parameter 0.81 at
..//Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0//i386-linux-thread-multi/DynaLoader.pm line
249. Compilation failed in require
Thomas Backlund wrote:
Citerar Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Some people/troll on the Mandrakeclub forum claim the mandrake-secure
kernel does not support HIGHMEM like the kernel-enterprise. Is it
possible to enable it in the kernel-secure, or to create a
kernel-secure-enterprise for
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 13:16:07 +, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
Le jeu 12/06/2003 à 07:34, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
no, png file has moved into gnome-icon-theme package..
as this screenshot and launch command icon miss
Known problem.. They are probably in gnome-panel package but I haven't yet
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2003, 13:41:38 Uhr MET, schrieb Frederic Crozat:
Known problem.. They are probably in gnome-panel package but I haven't yet
found enough time to update it..
I have the latest gnome-panel running on my system, but I've just
thrown out the mdk customizations. I'll do the
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2003, 13:15:17 Uhr MET, schrieb Till Kamppeter:
* Thu Jun 12 2003 Till Kamppeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.1.2-0.rc3.1mdk
- GPhoto2 2.1.2 RC3.
- libgphoto2-devel package requires glibc-devel and libexif-devel.
There's no need to add that requirements, as rpm's find-requires
Hi ,
I use openldap, nss_ldap and pam_ldap for autentification.
All work OK exceptly one point :
When users are member of many groups (40) , the system only take care of the
30 first groups !
Of course, this users can't acces to files owned by the 10 last groups :(
[EMAIL
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] Gtz Waschk wrote:
Am Sonntag,8. Juni 2003, 20:53:36 Uhr MET, schrieb Shlomi Fish:
http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/xmms-mplayer-0.2.1-2mdk.src.rpm
I added gtk-devel to the BuildRequires.
This is not needed, as libxmms1-devel already requires gtk-devel.
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2003, 15:04:46 Uhr MET, schrieb Shlomi Fish:
This is not needed, as libxmms1-devel already requires gtk-devel.
No, it doesn't. Check the xmms SRPM in cooker. Maybe it should. On my
Mandrake 9.1 system, I was able to rpm -e libgtk+1.2-devel and
libxmms1-devel remained.
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 13:05, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
Le mer 11/06/2003 à 22:19, Jason Straight a écrit :
I now also checked every package that owns a lib ldd listed konqueror and
kioslave and kio_thumbnail.so all turned up clean with rpm -V. I have no idea
why this happens if others
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4047
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
If you boot without devfs and without hdX=ide-scsi on command line, you get no
IDE CD-ROM. ide-cd being module, with devfs it is autoloaded by devfsd, with
ide-scsi it is preloaded in rc.sysinit (which is strictly speaking not
neccessary anymore, it was a fix for greedy ide-scsi once) but
On Thursday 12 June 2003 13:55, John Keller wrote:
I followed your steps to the letter. Unfortunately, make stops with an
error (make bzImage, by the way, is what is documented in the readme and
gives the same error as what follows):
-
sched.c: In function `schedule':
sched.c:714:
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could we maybe get perl-OpenGL packaged instead?
well perl-GTK is somewhat deprecated and nobody asked for perl-OpenGL
...
[mr] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# urpmi perl-GTK-GLArea
Some package requested cannot be installed:
perl-GTK-GLArea-0.7008-29mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied perl(OpenGL))
fixed in cooker
@resolution=fixed
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4050
Product: drakxtools
Component: DrakConnect
Summary: Errors in pppoe.conf, netcnx_up files
Product: drakxtools
Version: 9.1-0.10mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
[ndeb] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Line 47 of /usr/lib/libDrakX/Xconfig/test.pm checks if xfs is running. Whats strange
is that
XFdrake first stops xfs and then starts xfs without bothering to check that xfs was
running all
the time. A simple ps -e | grep xfs should reveal that.
I don't
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] Gtz Waschk wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2003, 15:04:46 Uhr MET, schrieb Shlomi Fish:
This is not needed, as libxmms1-devel already requires gtk-devel.
No, it doesn't. Check the xmms SRPM in cooker. Maybe it should. On my
Mandrake 9.1 system, I was able
On 12. jun 2003 13:54, baptiste wrote:
When users are member of many groups (40) , the system only take care of the
30 first groups !
Of course, this users can't acces to files owned by the 10 last groups :(
check linux default limits in linux/limits.h espec. NGROUPS_MAX
--
member
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
baptiste wrote:
Hi ,
I use openldap, nss_ldap and pam_ldap for autentification.
All work OK exceptly one point :
When users are member of many groups (40) , the system only take care
of the
30 first groups !
Of course, this users can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is any of this also the cause of goom/synaethesia not compiling as
detailed in message [Cooker] gcc issue with compiling goom in
MythTV/mythmusic?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2003, 17:19:36 Uhr MET, schrieb Shlomi Fish:
That's true for 9.1, but this list is about Cooker. The Cooker package
of libxmms1-devel has these dependancies:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9.2 goetz]$ rpm -q --requires libxmms1-devel
libxmms1 = 1.2.7-20mdk
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4051
Product: evolution
Component: evolution
Summary: Evolution crashes when adding or deleting contacts
Product: evolution
Version: 1.3.3-1mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:15, Robert L Martin wrote:
I will not continue this conversation any further, if it's
wished. However, I want the input of the cooker community about
this.
-
-
Until there is evidence that the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4050
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-06 11:40 ---
I confirm. this is made by the ADSL assistant of drakconnect.
I have two computers with 2 cards each, on the first (2 via-rhine cards) I had exactly
the
same
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3902
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2003 13:55, John Keller wrote:
This is exactly the error that I was getting before my last message.
Oops that is bad. Sorry, had you quoted this before we could spare
reinstallation.
Oh, that's all right. I would've mentioned it if I had really
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 02:50, Oden Eriksson wrote:
torsdagen den 12 juni 2003 11.26 skrev Per Øyvind Karlsen:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 11:15, Oden Eriksson wrote:
E: php-mhash unknown-key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 18:19, Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2003 02:50, Oden Eriksson wrote:
torsdagen den 12 juni 2003 11.26 skrev Per Øyvind Karlsen:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003
torsdagen den 12 juni 2003 18.26 skrev Per Øyvind Karlsen:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 18:19, Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2003 02:50, Oden Eriksson wrote:
torsdagen den 12 juni 2003 11.26 skrev Per Øyvind Karlsen:
-BEGIN PGP
Le Jeudi 12 Juin 2003 18:26, Per Øyvind Karlsen a écrit :
when uploading them yourself(not upping them to ftp.linux-mandrake.com) you
should'nt sign them, as you see, noone else does this, and when people are
installing your packages they'll get warnings about it because the package
has both
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Le Jeudi 12 Juin 2003 18:31, Oden Eriksson a écrit :
torsdagen den 12 juni 2003 18.26 skrev Per Øyvind Karlsen:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 18:19, Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2003 02:50, Oden Eriksson wrote:
torsdagen den 12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 18:31, Oden Eriksson wrote:
rpm --sign
rpm: --sign may only be used during package building
AFAIK you cannot resign a package if it's not signed in the first place.
?
rpm --addsign
- --
Regards,
Per Øyvind Karlsen
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 18:35, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le Jeudi 12 Juin 2003 18:26, Per Øyvind Karlsen a écrit :
when uploading them yourself(not upping them to ftp.linux-mandrake.com)
you should'nt sign them, as you see, noone else does this,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:
(and yes... Danny's latest kernels does AFAIK have all of
these, except for the latest vesafb / nforce2 udma133...)
^^
you sure I do not have the latest? If not I better add them.
Anyway, my plan
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-06 13:20 ---
*** Bug 520 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4046
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4039
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3295
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-06 14:04 ---
This still occurs in yesterday's cooker, both with hd.img and network.img (NFS
install from the same cooker tree directory). One thing I noticed is that the
errors all
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3957
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-06 14:09 ---
One additional detail. When I log on, the Workspace switcher is smashed up over
to the left, abutting the compressed Window List. If I manually move it to the
right
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4052
Product: kdebase
Component: kdebase
Summary: pam config file for screensaver references non-existent
pam module
Product: kdebase
Version: 3.1.2-8mdk
Platform: PC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Our local mirror mirrors off sunet.se, and is about a week behind (it
seems). It seems sunet.se is the problem:
ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrake-devel/
No files newer than 6 June AFAICS.
Since this server also carries updates
Viestissä Torstai 12. Kesäkuuta 2003 19:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:
(and yes... Danny's latest kernels does AFAIK have all of
these, except for the latest vesafb / nforce2 udma133...)
^^
you sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 09:26, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
I used to sign them myself, but Lenny told me not to, and I guess you
should'nt neither, unless there's any special reason for this..?
well I sent my sig to mandrake and the idea was to make
Hi,
The shell code that is used in spec files to run make check for packages
that require an X connection does not work properly. It does not take into
account that you need an entry in .Xauthority to connect to the X server,
and when the make check fails (for example because it can't connect to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 June 2003 19:55, Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2003 09:26, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
I used to sign them myself, but Lenny told me not to, and I guess you
should'nt neither, unless there's any special reason for this..?
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3851
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-06 18:31 ---
Just wanted to confirm it: kghostview remains on the first page on documents which can
be
seen without pb with gv...
--
Configure bugmail:
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 09:36, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
I think we should avoid political issues like this.. if we don't have to get
involved in politics, we should'nt, at least not politics that's not
software-related..
To quote the ever dependable Skunk Anansie:
Yes it's fucking political
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 12:15, Robert L Martin wrote:
and a slice of German Chocolate cake and don't forget the toy stamped made in Taiwan
either. Political Correctness is a Evil Bad and Wrong reason to Patch code.
Gah. I'm sorry, but this really pisses me off. Political correctness has
nothing
On the topic of the update kernel and the kernel that Danny maintains,
also applies to the modified update kernel from Thomas.
Would you guys consider giving your kernels different names, just so
that we don't have to ask confused users Which version of 2.4.21.0.18
are you using? The security
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 11:28 am, Oden Eriksson wrote:
onsdagen den 11 juni 2003 17.49 skrev Bret Baptist:
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 10:21 am, Oden Eriksson wrote:
Hey Oden, do you know if after the LZW patent expires on the 20th of
June, we are going to have a PHP-GD that can write
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:26, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
should'nt neither, unless there's any special reason for this..?
The apostrophe goes between the n and t, so shouldn't. Sorry to be
picky, but I keep seeing this and it's bugging me :).
--
adamw
Viestissä Torstai 12. Kesäkuuta 2003 21:59, H. Narfi Stefansson kirjoitti:
On the topic of the update kernel and the kernel that Danny maintains,
also applies to the modified update kernel from Thomas.
Would you guys consider giving your kernels different names, just so
that we don't have to
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, H. Narfi Stefansson wrote:
Would you guys consider giving your kernels different names, just so
that we don't have to ask confused users Which version of 2.4.21.0.18
are you using? The security update one, Thomas' one or Danny's?
Well, kernelteam doesn't tell me if
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 20:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:26, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
should'nt neither, unless there's any special reason for this..?
The apostrophe goes between the n and t, so shouldn't. Sorry to be
picky, but I keep seeing this and it's bugging me
Luca,
Was wondering if you have any idea where this error is coming from, or
what might be the cause:
The server appears to be running without issue.
Jun 11 12:04:00 phoenix cyrus-master[30827]: setrlimit: Unable to set
file descriptors limit to -1: Operation not permitted
Jun 11 12:04:00
I was just wondering if anyone has gotten postfix to work this way under
mdk 9.1.
I am getting error:
postfix/smtpd[2693]: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms
I am successfully authenticating imap (cyrus), ssh, login against an
ldap backend using saslauthd pam (just can't get
The pnet-devel package obsoletes the pnet package.
This makes that when you have pnet installed, it gets updated to pnet-devel,
which shouldn't happen.
Removing the provides/obsoletes from the specfile should fix it.
From the specfile:
%package devel
Summary: Headers for developing programs
Viestissä Torstai 12. Kesäkuuta 2003 23:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, H. Narfi Stefansson wrote:
Would you guys consider giving your kernels different names, just so
that we don't have to ask confused users Which version of 2.4.21.0.18
are you using? The security
Thomas Backlund wrote:
The reason my _updated_ update kernel kept the version
was to keep it name compatible with the original update kernel
so that 3rd party modules and RPMS wont complain ( nVidia, Ati, ...)
Ah! That's a good reason.
I agree with Danny that hackkernel is a bad, bad name! The
En/na magic ha escrit:
I was just wondering if anyone has gotten postfix to work this way under
mdk 9.1.
I am getting error:
postfix/smtpd[2693]: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms
I am successfully authenticating imap (cyrus), ssh, login against an
ldap backend using saslauthd pam
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4053
Product: bk_edit
Component: packaging
Summary: symlink for the plugins directory is in the wrong
location
Product: bk_edit
Version: 0.6.18-1mdk
Platform: PC
Hi!
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:31:40 +0200 (CEST)
Götz Waschk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Name: gnome-themes-extras
Very nice! Thanks!
Unfortunately the industrial.so required by
/usr/share/themes/Gorilla/gtk/gtkrc is missing.
And the following error message can be seen:
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 21:17, Dave Cotton wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 20:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:26, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
should'nt neither, unless there's any special reason for this..?
The apostrophe goes between the n and t, so shouldn't. Sorry to
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4054
Product: xfsdump
Component: xfsdump
Summary: xfs_fsr works only partially
Product: xfsdump
Version: 2.0.3-1mdk
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Why is libqt3-devel-3.1.2-6mdk 34 MB and libqt3-devel-3.1.2-7mdk is 75 MB?
Wich is as I stated earlier:
running Cooker kernel is like living on the edge...
running a hackkernel means you already made the jump ... ;-()
(feel the rush... it's not the fall that kills you... it's the stop
at
the end of the fall...)
...or as those who like to engage in such things say, It
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2003 23:34 schrieb Luca Olivetti:
En/na magic ha escrit:
I was just wondering if anyone has gotten postfix to work this way under
mdk 9.1.
I am getting error:
postfix/smtpd[2693]: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms
I am successfully authenticating
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4055
Product: postfix
Component: packaging
Summary: Patch postfix.spec to use SASL2 libraries instead of
SASL1 libraries
Product: postfix
Version: 2.0.9-4mdk
Platform: PC
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Micah Buckley-Farlee wrote:
OK I've searched the archives, can't seem to find a fix, so here goes...
Alright, I start installing, and it installs all of the packages fine,
and then the problems occur. After i have entered the root password,
created my password, and set
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Ben Donovan wrote:
I haven't noticed any problems with it. Can you suggest a way of checking
it, or is the only way to remove chips until it works?
I know there are bootable memcheck programs for x86. Don't know that I've
seen PPC versions. Might have something to
Sounds pretty straightforward - you're out of space. What size
partitions
did you use?
I used the erase hard drive option, which appears to just partition
everything using the defaults.
I tried messing around with the custom partitioning a bit, but I would
always get a no bootstrap error when I
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Micah Buckley-Farlee wrote:
Sounds pretty straightforward - you're out of space. What size
partitions
did you use?
I used the erase hard drive option, which appears to just partition
everything using the defaults.
I tried messing
98 matches
Mail list logo
