On Saturday 28 December 2002 02:40, Thomas Backlund wrote:
From: Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 25 Dec 2002, Robert Fox wrote:
I found this on /. and thought this would be cool to package for 9.1
www.xpde.com
Looks interesting - at least as an alternative WM.
I don't
From: Olivier Thauvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Samedi 28 Décembre 2002 01:40, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
From: Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It should be possible to rebuild all mdk packages only with mdk distro. (I
except issue with bad version).
You can build GPL packages with it, but it
From: Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 25 Dec 2002, Robert Fox wrote:
I found this on /. and thought this would be cool to package for 9.1
www.xpde.com
Looks interesting - at least as an alternative WM.
I don't think it's feasible, for technical reasons ...
I've got the source
Le Samedi 28 Décembre 2002 01:40, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
From: Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 25 Dec 2002, Robert Fox wrote:
I found this on /. and thought this would be cool to package for 9.1
www.xpde.com
Looks interesting - at least as an alternative WM.
I don't
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 03:36:30AM +, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
If, as has previously been discussed on this list, an rpm that provides
MS fonts can; if included at all, only be done as plf, then how could it
be otherwise for a pkg that requires any of said fonts.
This solve the pb, a
On 25 Dec 2002, Robert Fox wrote:
I found this on /. and thought this would be cool to package for 9.1
www.xpde.com
Looks interesting - at least as an alternative WM.
I don't think it's feasible, for technical reasons ...
I've got the source somewhere, but AFAIK it is built with Kylix (in
I found this on /. and thought this would be cool to package for 9.1
www.xpde.com
Looks interesting - at least as an alternative WM.
Cheers,
R.Fox
--
Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fox Consulting Services
Le Mercredi 25 Décembre 2002 22:21, Robert Fox a écrit :
I found this on /. and thought this would be cool to package for 9.1
www.xpde.com
Looks interesting - at least as an alternative WM.
Cheers,
R.Fox
I can try, but I think icons and look can be a problem.
Lenny ? contrib or plf ?
--
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 11:54:12PM +, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
I can try, but I think icons and look can be a problem.
Lenny ? contrib or plf ?
As long as no images were taken directly then there's no issue. Apple v
Microsoft has already proven that look and feel is not protected.
--
Ben
Le Jeudi 26 Décembre 2002 00:12, Ben Reser a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 11:54:12PM +, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
I can try, but I think icons and look can be a problem.
Lenny ? contrib or plf ?
As long as no images were taken directly then there's no issue. Apple v
Microsoft has
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 12:45:18AM +, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le Jeudi 26 Décembre 2002 00:12, Ben Reser a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 11:54:12PM +, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
I can try, but I think icons and look can be a problem.
Lenny ? contrib or plf ?
As long as no images
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 12:45:18AM +, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le Jeudi 26 Décembre 2002 00:12, Ben Reser a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 11:54:12PM +, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
I can try, but I think icons and look can be a problem.
Lenny ? contrib or plf ?
As long as no images
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 17:27:33 -0800
Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should add looking at the screenshot, while it has similar feel to
XP. It sure doesn't look like it's using images taken out of XP. The
icons certainly look different, though they do have a similar style to
them.
What
Le Jeudi 26 Décembre 2002 03:02, Charles A Edwards a écrit :
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 17:27:33 -0800
[...]
If, as has previously been discussed on this list, an rpm that provides
MS fonts can; if included at all, only be done as plf, then how could it
be otherwise for a pkg that requires any of
14 matches
Mail list logo
