Re: [Cooker] dosfstools-2.8-2mdk: no fsck.vfat

Hi! On Son, 19 Mai 2002 14:28:01 Pixel wrote: > it used to be "unsafe" to use dosfsck. That's why it was better not to > check fat's. This may have changed (i don't see any mention of danger > in dosfsck) Well, ok, dosfsck says, it's still alpha for fat32. And it is probably wise to let window

Re: [Cooker] dosfstools-2.8-2mdk: no fsck.vfat

Michael Reinsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it intentional that /sbin/fsck.vfat is missing from dosfstools? > /sbin/dosfsck is present, only the symlink to /sbin/fsck.vfat (and > /sbin/fsck.msdos) is IMHO missing. it used to be "unsafe" to use dosfsck. That's why it was better not to check

[Cooker] dosfstools-2.8-2mdk: no fsck.vfat

Hi! Is it intentional that /sbin/fsck.vfat is missing from dosfstools? /sbin/dosfsck is present, only the symlink to /sbin/fsck.vfat (and /sbin/fsck.msdos) is IMHO missing. -- Michael Reinsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mr.uue.org --