On 2003-04-01(Tue) 18:56:39 -0500, Austin wrote:
On 2003.04.01 17:39 Levi Ramsey wrote:
1. Package gtkmm2.
I've done that for a while, packaged up to libgnomeuimm, but not
uploaded. So right now it's severely outdated (1.3.x). But you can
try to take it as reference though. Do you need it?
Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue Apr 01 17:29 -0500, Austin wrote:
Here's a few things that need doing that are a bit too tricky for me.
Is anyone working on them?
1. Package gtkmm2.
I've had that on a TODO for a while... last I asked gc about it, he said
it wasn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you sure about that? Packaging gtkmm2 is rather a fcrozat's
thing.
And here I though we were aiming to have more community maintenance?
Last time I asked, he said he didn't
On 2003.04.02 04:55 Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
1. Package gtkmm2.
Are you sure about that? Packaging gtkmm2 is rather a fcrozat's
thing. Last time I asked, he said he didn't really want to do it
until no package in the distro need it, which is rather sensible.
People do need it.
I've had two
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you sure about that? Packaging gtkmm2 is rather a fcrozat's
thing.
And here I though we were aiming to have more community maintenance?
!? That's not the point. Levi said I
Le mer 02/04/2003 à 16:39, Austin a écrit :
On 2003.04.02 04:55 Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
1. Package gtkmm2.
Are you sure about that? Packaging gtkmm2 is rather a fcrozat's
thing. Last time I asked, he said he didn't really want to do it
until no package in the distro need it,
On 2003.04.02 09:55 Frederic Crozat wrote:
1. Package gtkmm2.
If you want to upload to contrib, I don't have any objection, but I
won't maintain it..
Okay. Will do.
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching Assistant
On Wed Apr 02 11:55 +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Are you sure about that? Packaging gtkmm2 is rather a fcrozat's
thing. Last time I asked, he said he didn't really want to do it
until no package in the distro need it, which is rather sensible.
It may have been fcrozat... it was a fairly
Am Dienstag, 1. April 2003, 17:29:34 Uhr MET, schrieb Austin:
Here's a few things that need doing that are a bit too tricky for me.
Is anyone working on them?
2. Package pygnome2 and fix any pygnome/pygnome2 contflicts/confusions.
I've uploaded a new pygnome 1.x that doesn't conflict anymore
On 2003.04.02 11:28 Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Dienstag, 1. April 2003, 17:29:34 Uhr MET, schrieb Austin:
Here's a few things that need doing that are a bit too tricky for me.
Is anyone working on them?
2. Package pygnome2 and fix any pygnome/pygnome2 contflicts/confusions.
I've uploaded a new
Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2003, 12:57:54 Uhr MET, schrieb Austin:
Are you going to package pygnome2?
You mean gnome-python? It's already in the contribs. It's based on the
rawhide package, that's why the name.
--
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the
homeless, whether the
Here's a few things that need doing that are a bit too tricky for me.
Is anyone working on them?
1. Package gtkmm2.
2. Package pygnome2 and fix any pygnome/pygnome2 contflicts/confusions.
3. Fix CVS/upload script to include non-bzipped icons.
4. Fix RPM problem which sets Requires: perl 5.800
On Tue Apr 01 17:29 -0500, Austin wrote:
Here's a few things that need doing that are a bit too tricky for me.
Is anyone working on them?
1. Package gtkmm2.
I've had that on a TODO for a while... last I asked gc about it, he said
it wasn't really a priority..
--
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL
On 2003.04.01 17:39 Levi Ramsey wrote:
1. Package gtkmm2.
I've had that on a TODO for a while... last I asked gc about it, he said
it wasn't really a priority..
I have several packages I'm waiting to do becuase of this missing.
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
14 matches
Mail list logo
