Re: [cooker] TC-Meeting 2020-10-21
Hello, I *think* these are the logs for TC-Meeting held 2020-10-21: https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/%23openmandriva-cooker/2020-10-21-15%3A01_untitled.html https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/%23openmandriva-cooker/2020-10-21-15%3A01_untitled.log And for TC-Meeting held 2020-10-14: https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/%23openmandriva-cooker/2020-10-14-15%3A24_untitled.html https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/%23openmandriva-cooker/2020-10-14-15%3A24_untitled.log Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 10/21/20 4:41 AM, Ben Bullard wrote: Hello, Might be a good day for TC-Meeting if only I could find the agenda we made last week for this week, Dadgummit! This is the last meeting log I could find: https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/%23openmandriva-cooker/2020-07-09-15%3A18_OpenMandriva-TC-Meeting.log There is an agenda somewhere, I just know there is. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
Re: [cooker] TC-Meeting 2020-10-21 17:00 CEST, 15:00 UTC
Hello again, These are logs from last weeks meeting: https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/%23openmandriva-cooker/2020-10-14-15%3A24_untitled.html _And this log show tentative/starter agenda for this week_ meeting if we have one. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 10/21/20 4:41 AM, Ben Bullard wrote: Hello, Might be a good day for TC-Meeting if only I could find the agenda we made last week for this week, Dadgummit! This is the last meeting log I could find: https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/%23openmandriva-cooker/2020-07-09-15%3A18_OpenMandriva-TC-Meeting.log There is an agenda somewhere, I just know there is. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
[cooker] TC-Meeting 2020-10-21
Hello, Might be a good day for TC-Meeting if only I could find the agenda we made last week for this week, Dadgummit! This is the last meeting log I could find: https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/%23openmandriva-cooker/2020-07-09-15%3A18_OpenMandriva-TC-Meeting.log There is an agenda somewhere, I just know there is. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
Re: [cooker] Updated bug report list
Howdy, These I can't tell if they are valid bug reports or not. Partly because I don't understand OP's writing. Inkscape / Pango puke by every command his version... what had they eat ?? https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2611 NFS don't automount by Systemstart https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2607 These need to be checked by a developer or otherwise more knowledgeable person: OMLx 4.1 bugs: Invesalius missing dependencies (Lx 4.1) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2585 Kdenlive always segfaults on exit/close (Lx 4.1) (Though I *think* this applies to all version of OM Lx) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2589 freecad don't install (Lx 4.1) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2593 Blender don't start (Lx 4.1) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2596 amule crashes (Lx 4.1) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2597 frescobaldi don't start (Lx 4.1) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2598 Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 10/14/20 1:18 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: Hello folks, There is a catch all bug report for bugs we need to fix before releasing Lx 4.2. QA: Bugs to be fixed for 4.2 http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2644 List current as of 2020-08-28 I checked back to 2020-01-01. Broken PulseAudio 13.99.2 on Realtek ALC888 (Cooker) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2653 pdfviewer cannot start due to error in libQt5Pdf.so.5 (Lx 4.1) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2652 TeX Live: broken tlpkg / texlive.post: installing texlive-babel breaks the use of LaTeX (Lx 4.1) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2651 Chromium-browser-stable and Falkon do not work on video wbsites like YouTube (Cooker) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2650 PrintScreen button not working http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2649 (Cooker) om-welcome is not localized http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2648 (Cooker) om-repo-picker is not localized (Cooker) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2647 Restore entries in GRUB screen (May be fixed in Git) (Cooker) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2646 Firewall module in systemsettings does not display correct (Cooker) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645 User has to enter password twice for wifi (Plasma-NM applet broken?) (Is this fixed?) (Cooker) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2643 Package request for broadcom-wl. (User request) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2642 (Cooker) openCPN coredump/segfault https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2638 (Lx 4.1) [Package Request] QGIS https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2636 (Lx 4.1) Login sound not played (or not correctly) Plasma 5.19.3, KF 5.72.0 (Cooker) (Upstream) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2629 Change to mount point in KDE Partition Manager are not written to /etc/fstab (ALL OM Lx versions) (Upstream) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2628 Upgrade one branch kernel to another branch kernel of same version number fails. (Cooker) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2619 grub2-editor (kcm_grub2) "Failed to save GRUB settings." DBus backend error. (Cooker) (But affects all OM Lx versions) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2618 Samba works not (Cooker) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2609 (This one I'm not sure of, I don't use or know samba myself) -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
[cooker] Updated bug report list
Hello folks, There is a catch all bug report for bugs we need to fix before releasing Lx 4.2. QA: Bugs to be fixed for 4.2 http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2644 List current as of 2020-08-28 I checked back to 2020-01-01. Broken PulseAudio 13.99.2 on Realtek ALC888 (Cooker) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2653 pdfviewer cannot start due to error in libQt5Pdf.so.5 (Lx 4.1) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2652 TeX Live: broken tlpkg / texlive.post: installing texlive-babel breaks the use of LaTeX (Lx 4.1) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2651 Chromium-browser-stable and Falkon do not work on video wbsites like YouTube (Cooker) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2650 PrintScreen button not working http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2649 (Cooker) om-welcome is not localized http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2648 (Cooker) om-repo-picker is not localized (Cooker) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2647 Restore entries in GRUB screen (May be fixed in Git) (Cooker) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2646 Firewall module in systemsettings does not display correct (Cooker) http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645 User has to enter password twice for wifi (Plasma-NM applet broken?) (Is this fixed?) (Cooker) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2643 Package request for broadcom-wl. (User request) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2642 (Cooker) openCPN coredump/segfault https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2638 (Lx 4.1) [Package Request] QGIS https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2636 (Lx 4.1) Login sound not played (or not correctly) Plasma 5.19.3, KF 5.72.0 (Cooker) (Upstream) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2629 Change to mount point in KDE Partition Manager are not written to /etc/fstab (ALL OM Lx versions) (Upstream) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2628 Upgrade one branch kernel to another branch kernel of same version number fails. (Cooker) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2619 grub2-editor (kcm_grub2) "Failed to save GRUB settings." DBus backend error. (Cooker) (But affects all OM Lx versions) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2618 Samba works not (Cooker) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2609 (This one I'm not sure of, I don't use or know samba myself) -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
[cooker] Update on most recent bug reports (2020-08-28)
Hello folks, These are bugs filed at issues.openmandriva.org aka our Bugzilla against various versions of OM Lx mostly against Cooker. This is *most* of the recent bugs but not all, There will be some package request or "difficult to understand/filed by *special* user" bugs not listed here. List current as of 2020-08-28 I checked back to 2020-01-01. User has to enter password twice for wifi (Plasma-NM applet broken?) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2643 Package request for broadcom-wl. (User request) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2642 openCPN coredump/segfault https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2638 [Package Request] QGIS https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2636 Cooker Host: VirtualBox 6.1.12 VM's do not start https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2634 VBox plasma desktop crash (virtualbox-guest-additions) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2633 Login sound not played (or not correctly) Plasma 5.19.3, KF 5.72.0 https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2629 Change to mount point in KDE Partition Manager are not written to /etc/fstab (ALL OM Lx versions) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2628 OM-Control-Center does not work with Wayland (Cooker) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2625 Upgrade one branch kernel to another branch kernel of same version number fails. https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2619 grub2-editor (kcm_grub2) "Failed to save GRUB settings." DBus backend error. (ALL OM Lx versions) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2618 Issues when creating issues in bugzilla https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2613 Samba works not https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2609 (This one I'm not sure of, I don't use or know samba myself) -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Testing
On 8/1/20 7:58 AM, Raphaël Jadot wrote: The ml seems to have low activity, I'm testing if it's simply holidays or if ml has issues :) -- Raphaël J. -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists I received your e-mail. This list does seem to have very low activity. Don't know why myself beyond people have gotten in to habit of trying to do all contributor communication on IRC. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
Re: [cooker] TC-Meeting 2020-05-29 16:00 UTC
On 5/28/20 1:34 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: Hello OpenMandriva contributors, TC-Meeting 2020-05-29 16:00 UTC What 2020-05-29 is not a Wednesday. No it is not. We need to have a meeting on a non-traditional day in order to get things in the distro rolling again. Topics to be discussed: 1. Releasing the new updated, with an important bug fix, Lx 4.1 ISO's 2. Wallpaper for Cooker that identifies as Cooker and for Rolling that identifies as Rolling 3.. Announcing Rolling. 4. Releasing OM Lx 4.2 Alpha 5. AIB (Any Interesting Bugs) 6. AOB (Any Other Business) https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/%23openmandriva-cooker/2020-05-29-15%3A07_Topics--1--Releasing-the-new-updated--with-an-important-bug-fix--Lx-4-1-ISO-s.html -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
[cooker] TC-Meeting 2020-05-29 16:00 UTC
Hello OpenMandriva contributors, TC-Meeting 2020-05-29 16:00 UTC What 2020-05-29 is not a Wednesday. No it is not. We need to have a meeting on a non-traditional day in order to get things in the distro rolling again. Topics to be discussed: 1. Releasing the new updated, with an important bug fix, Lx 4.1 ISO's 2. Wallpaper for Cooker that identifies as Cooker and for Rolling that identifies as Rolling 3.. Announcing Rolling. 4. Releasing OM Lx 4.2 Alpha 5. AIB (Any Interesting Bugs) 6. AOB (Any Other Business) -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] TC-Meeting 2020-05-08
Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 5/27/20 6:52 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: On 5/27/20 6:25 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: Did we agree or not to release the updated Lx 4.1 ISO's? I think the consensus was "yes, if we can get it tested" I did test the Iso's on hw and vbox. Reported on IRC that they seem to work just fine. -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
[cooker] TC-Meeting 2020-05-08
Hello OpenMandriva contributors, So we probably ought to try to have a TC-Meeting tomorrow. Did we agree or not to release the updated Lx 4.1 ISO's? Also need to get ball rolling to announce Rolling and release Lx 4.2 Alpha. I'm sure there will be other issues of concern so we need a chance for people to speak. So it's not Wednesday you say. So what. We need to do this. If tomorrow does not work for people pick a day that does, Fri., Sat, or Sun. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Rolling and Rock 4.1 updated with kernel 5.5.10 and Mesa 20.0.2 [Testing]
+1 Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 3/20/20 11:59 AM, Tomasz Gajc wrote: +1 pt., 20 mar 2020 o 16:42 Angry Penguin <mailto:angrypenguinpol...@gmail.com>> napisał(a): Hi. Time to revive our Mailing List, so that no one says that OM ML is dead :) As is title, in testing repository for Lx 4.1 Rock and in Rolling release a new graphics stack - Mesa 20.0.2 with kernel 5.5.10 is available. Fell free to test it and report potentially issues before moving to stable repo. Best regards /AngryPenguin/ /Damian Marcin Szymański/
Re: [cooker] Is there anything I can do to help get Rolling working again? ASAP
Hello, Received. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 3/12/20 5:12 PM, Raphaël Jadot wrote: I'm also interested to know :) 29.02.2020, 22:46, "Ben Bullard" : Hello, By "working again" ofc I'm referring to package building. This not working for a few days was one thing but we are way past a few days. QA really, seriously, needs for package building in Rolling to be working to do QA. So what can I do to help expedite getting this fixed? Are there packages or a list of packages I could start building in Cooker so we can get Rolling fixed so QA can do QA? I believe this should have been more of a priority. If someone will tell me what I can do I'm willing to do things to get this working again. Right now today I do consider this more important than pumping ever more updated packages to Cooker. We really need to fix this now. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists -- Raphaël J. �$z���X��X��m (���jwk��l
Re: [cooker] Re: Test
Hello, I did receive this. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 3/12/20 2:39 PM, Raphaël Jadot wrote: No emails since 13 days, you face issues? 24.02.2020, 14:42, "Tomasz Gajc" : Retest pon., 24 lut 2020, 14:14 użytkownik Tomasz Gajc mailto:tpg...@gmail.com>> napisał: If you can read this please respond -- Raphaël J. -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
[cooker] Is there anything I can do to help get Rolling working again? ASAP
Hello, By "working again" ofc I'm referring to package building. This not working for a few days was one thing but we are way past a few days. QA really, seriously, needs for package building in Rolling to be working to do QA. So what can I do to help expedite getting this fixed? Are there packages or a list of packages I could start building in Cooker so we can get Rolling fixed so QA can do QA? I believe this should have been more of a priority. If someone will tell me what I can do I'm willing to do things to get this working again. Right now today I do consider this more important than pumping ever more updated packages to Cooker. We really need to fix this now. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Welcome back to cooker mailing list
Hello world, Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 2/24/20 7:19 AM, Raphaël Jadot wrote: Title says all :) -- Raphaël J. -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Re: Test
Hello world, Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 2/24/20 7:42 AM, Tomasz Gajc wrote: Retest pon., 24 lut 2020, 14:14 użytkownik Tomasz Gajc <mailto:tpg...@gmail.com>> napisał: If you can read this please respond -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] ben79 makes big mistake with Lx 4.0 packages.
Or if you wish tell me and I'll rebuild any packages that need it. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 11/25/19 9:54 AM, Ben Bullard wrote: Hello, The idiot with the help of more knowledgeable people got this fixed now. Unfortunately any packages built in 4.0 that depend on perl packages will probably need to be rebuilt. Apologies to everyone. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 11/22/19 8:31 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: Hello, I built the i3-wm desktop for Rolling and Lx 4.0. In doing so I had to upgrade some perl packages and stupidly published them to updates repo in Lx 4.0. These got published to updates: perl, perl-JSON-XS, perl-common-sense, perl-Template-Toolkit, and perl-Canary-Stability >>> They probably should be reverted but I don't know how to do this. If I knew how I would do it myself. And I'm kicking myself pretty good over this stupid mistake. Learning and all that but I hate learning stuff this way in front of other people. I also hate that it might affect Lx 4.0 users. The workaround to upgrade Lx 4.0 or Rock until this is fixed is: `$ sudo dnf clean all` `$ sudo dnf -x=perl* -x=lib64perl5 upgrade` For users notice published here: https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/notice-updating-in-lx-4-0-is-messed-up-workaround/3215 -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] ben79 makes big mistake with Lx 4.0 packages.
Hello, The idiot with the help of more knowledgeable people got this fixed now. Unfortunately any packages built in 4.0 that depend on perl packages will probably need to be rebuilt. Apologies to everyone. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 11/22/19 8:31 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: Hello, I built the i3-wm desktop for Rolling and Lx 4.0. In doing so I had to upgrade some perl packages and stupidly published them to updates repo in Lx 4.0. These got published to updates: perl, perl-JSON-XS, perl-common-sense, perl-Template-Toolkit, and perl-Canary-Stability >>> They probably should be reverted but I don't know how to do this. If I knew how I would do it myself. And I'm kicking myself pretty good over this stupid mistake. Learning and all that but I hate learning stuff this way in front of other people. I also hate that it might affect Lx 4.0 users. The workaround to upgrade Lx 4.0 or Rock until this is fixed is: `$ sudo dnf clean all` `$ sudo dnf -x=perl* -x=lib64perl5 upgrade` For users notice published here: https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/notice-updating-in-lx-4-0-is-messed-up-workaround/3215 -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
[cooker] ben79 makes big mistake with Lx 4.0 packages.
Hello, I built the i3-wm desktop for Rolling and Lx 4.0. In doing so I had to upgrade some perl packages and stupidly published them to updates repo in Lx 4.0. These got published to updates: perl, perl-JSON-XS, perl-common-sense, perl-Template-Toolkit, and perl-Canary-Stability >>> They probably should be reverted but I don't know how to do this. If I knew how I would do it myself. And I'm kicking myself pretty good over this stupid mistake. Learning and all that but I hate learning stuff this way in front of other people. I also hate that it might affect Lx 4.0 users. The workaround to upgrade Lx 4.0 or Rock until this is fixed is: `$ sudo dnf clean all` `$ sudo dnf -x=perl* -x=lib64perl5 upgrade` For users notice published here: https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/notice-updating-in-lx-4-0-is-messed-up-workaround/3215 -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] om-mirror-selector
Thanks for fixing rugyada. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 11/22/19 11:22 AM, rugyada wrote: Fixed. Package updated. Il giorno gio 21 nov 2019 alle ore 21:15 Ben Bullard ha scritto: Hello, Noticed today that the package om-mirror-selector has some mirrors in it's list that do not work. $ sudo om-mirror-selector.sh -m [sudo] password for ben79: Please select the mirror you want to use by typing the number next to it: 1 http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/downloads.openmandriva.org 2 http://openmandriva.c3sl.ufpr.br 3 http://distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/pub/linux/openmandriva 4 http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/openmandriva 5 http://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/openmandriva 6 http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/openmandriva 7 http://mirror.lagoon.nc/pub/openmandriva 8 http://mirror.rise.ph/openmandriva 9 http://ftp.icm.edu.pl/pub/Linux/dist/openmandriva 10 http://ftp.vectranet.pl/mirror/openmandriva.org 11 http://ftp.pwr.wroc.pl/OpenMandriva 12 http://mirror.yandex.ru/openmandriva 13 http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/openmandriva.org 14 http://ftp.yzu.edu.tw/Linux/openmandriva 15 http://distro.ibiblio.org/openmandriva 16 http://abf-downloads.openmandriva.org At this point I know that 2, 3, and 14 won't work. Guess I'll try to check the others. Anyone given that we have users that will always pick exactly the wrong thing in any list involving our repos it would be imminently wise to remove any non-working repos from the list this package uses. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
[cooker] om-mirror-selector
Hello, Noticed today that the package om-mirror-selector has some mirrors in it's list that do not work. $ sudo om-mirror-selector.sh -m [sudo] password for ben79: Please select the mirror you want to use by typing the number next to it: 1 http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/downloads.openmandriva.org 2 http://openmandriva.c3sl.ufpr.br 3 http://distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/pub/linux/openmandriva 4 http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/openmandriva 5 http://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/openmandriva 6 http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/openmandriva 7 http://mirror.lagoon.nc/pub/openmandriva 8 http://mirror.rise.ph/openmandriva 9 http://ftp.icm.edu.pl/pub/Linux/dist/openmandriva 10 http://ftp.vectranet.pl/mirror/openmandriva.org 11 http://ftp.pwr.wroc.pl/OpenMandriva 12 http://mirror.yandex.ru/openmandriva 13 http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/openmandriva.org 14 http://ftp.yzu.edu.tw/Linux/openmandriva 15 http://distro.ibiblio.org/openmandriva 16 http://abf-downloads.openmandriva.org At this point I know that 2, 3, and 14 won't work. Guess I'll try to check the others. Anyone given that we have users that will always pick exactly the wrong thing in any list involving our repos it would be imminently wise to remove any non-working repos from the list this package uses. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] If there is a TC-Meeting today (Possible topics for AIB)
Howdy, Freaking Awesome, thanks. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 11/20/19 3:29 PM, Angry Penguin wrote: 1. Stellarium is available in unsupported repo. I just update it to 0.19.2. 2. gimp-plugin-astronomy package added to cooker (main repo). 3. Try bluefish, package updated to latest release. śr., 20 lis 2019 o 15:59 Ben Bullard <mailto:benbullar...@cox.net>> napisał(a): Hello, First I'll either be late or absent due to an appointment. If there is any interest for AIB there are some recent reports in the nature of package/feature requests. 1. Enhancement; please add package stellarium http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2558 2. Enhancement: please add package gimp-plugin-astronomy http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2559 3. Replacement for Kompozer such as BlueGriffon: No bug report filed for this yet, if no one else does I'll file a bug report sometime by this weekend. https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/kompozer/3210/ -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
[cooker] If there is a TC-Meeting today (Possible topics for AIB)
Hello, First I'll either be late or absent due to an appointment. If there is any interest for AIB there are some recent reports in the nature of package/feature requests. 1. Enhancement; please add package stellarium http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2558 2. Enhancement: please add package gimp-plugin-astronomy http://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2559 3. Replacement for Kompozer such as BlueGriffon: No bug report filed for this yet, if no one else does I'll file a bug report sometime by this weekend. https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/kompozer/3210/ -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting 09-10-2019 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
Suggested addenda to agenda: 1. OMLx 4.1 alpha release 2. Where's the news people? We can't post news if you don't tell us the news. 3. AIB 4. AOB On 10/8/19 3:42 PM, rugyada wrote: Suggested agenda: 1. OMLx 4.1 alpha release 2. AOB
Re: [cooker] kernel-release-clang
Hi, I'm thinking we want to publish this in https://www.openmandriva.org/en/news/ as soon as there are successful builds. Then pubic relations folks can distribute news to Linux mags and social media. So please keep us informed here or make a note of this on IRC. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 10/2/19 1:44 AM, Tomasz Gajc wrote: Hi, I've split kernel-release to new package kernel-release-clang so you can have installed kernel compiled with GCC and LLVM/clang together. https://abf.openmandriva.org/openmandriva/kernel-release-clang Feel free to give it a good test.
Re: [cooker] Hello, just a test
Hello esteemed colleagues, Testing Reply. On 9/24/19 8:25 AM, Raphaël Jadot wrote: Cheers, -- Raphaël J. -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting 14-08-2019 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
On 8/13/19 10:27 PM, rugyada wrote: Suggested agenda: 1. Maintenance/management of 4.0 and Rolling -- State of Rolling -- Handling of Rolling https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/3004 2 -- Procedure for QA to manage packages -- Kahinah or try other solution -- QA training and education 2. Github alternatives, first feedbacks with test instances -- ref: https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/2992/4 3. Packaging and feature requests 4. AOB I may not be able to be present due to illness. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting 07-08-2019 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
On 8/7/19 7:44 AM, rugyada wrote: Suggested agenda: 1. Maintenance/management of 4.0 and Rolling -- State of Rolling -- Handling of Rolling https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/3004 -- Procedure for QA to manage packages -- QA training and education 2. Dual monitors and TV used as monitor issues 3. AIB 4. AOB For #2 it has been suggested that we discuss this if we have devs available that have the time and want to deal with this issue. This is something that worked in OpenMandriva from 2013 through Lx3 and is broken in Lx 4.0. I don't recall anyone using OM Lx 4.0 that has reported this working properly. Bug Report: https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2510 Forum: https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/om-lx-4-0-does-not-work-with-tv-monitor/2883/ Also: https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/attempt-at-workaround-for-tv-as-monitor-live-iso-and-installed-system/2971/12 If we don't have devs in the meeting interested in this issue or if devs simply don't have time for this I would rather we devote our meeting time to item #1. Also if needed for item #1 we can skip #3 AIB. This would be an AIB synopsis: Bugs are where they always have been https://issues.openmandriva.org/. There are plenty to work on for anyone with time. Majority of recent bug reports have been Package/feature requests. There are a few operational issues reported as well. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Handling of Rolling
On 8/4/19 12:00 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: Hi, rolling is looking good so far -- hasn't broken badly, and has quite a few nice updates we don't want to bother 4.0 users with. But I'm a bit concerned about minor updates that get pushed into cooker not making it to rolling (even though rolling is where in the end releases will happen), probably because people [including myself, got to get into it] tend to forget about the small updates once they're there. The auto-updater also never pushes stuff to rolling. I wonder if we should reverse the logic here a bit: Right now, we push stuff from cooker to rolling/testing manually. It may be better to have a way to manually mark packages that are not ready yet (e.g. toolchain updates that need more extensive testing) and automatically build everything not marked that way in rolling after a couple of days. Keeping cooker and rolling separate is probably necessary, because for some things they will diverge A LOT at some point (imagine the Qt 5 -> Qt 6 transition that will likely happen next year... Got to get cooker to Qt6/Plasma6 quickly while keeping rolling stable). Any thoughts/opinions? ttyl bero -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists I'm certainly in general agreement on the points made. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
[cooker] RE: May 31 group discussion about iwd in OpenMandriva.
Hello everyone, This issue points out that we need to have a serious discussion about how we are or aren't communicating. On or about May 31 a number of us found our wifi broken. Turned out to be an upgrade to networkmanager forcing implementation of iwd. Enough people lost wifi to provoke a group discussion on IRC @ #openmandriva-cooker. We as a group agreed that iwd was not ready to implement by default in OpenMandriva because there are to many chip sets that won't work with it at this time. These 2 commits: https://github.com/OpenMandrivaAssociation/omdv-build-iso/commit/8031648fbd8940fa95cc6bb568a90259741f412e https://github.com/OpenMandrivaAssociation/networkmanager/commit/baaf20639a956488e99ccfe338e7255c1dc70209 Please get that. The contributors group on IRC discussed as a group and agreed as a group on something. Both developers and QA-Team members were present and in agreement. This was a group decision not one person acting alone. Fast forward to yesterday, July 18, and when I go on IRC there are people discussing this again? What? "We already discussed this and agreed on this!" Well it turns out this change got pushed again. Apparently without any discussion or agreement that I'm aware of. There was a commit 16 days ago on github but I would have thought that since no one agreed with that and the issue was not discussed the commit would and should sit there until it was discussed and either agreed on or disagreed on. In other words I thought the published policy would be followed. The published policy does include "waiting for others to accept it". What published policy? This: https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/Policies/Repository_Policies Which includes the following: " = Cooker = Cooker is an experimental branch that can break at times. Most things are ok to do here, including updating to a beta version or even a git/svn/cvs/hg/whatever snapshot of an upstream package. To make sure you don't "surprise" other developers by breaking everything for them, major changes need to be coordinated by either: * bringing them up in a TC meeting * sending a pull request on the repository and waiting for others to accept it * sending an email to the cooker ML and waiting for others' positive reply Changes that need coordination include, but are not limited to * switching out a major system component for something else (e.g. Xorg -> wayland, Qt 5 -> Qt 6, wpa_supplicant -> iwd, systemd -> any other init system, ...) -- any such change should be tested in a personal repository first. * update that will require a load of rebuilds (e.g. updating libpng to a version with a new soname) * dropping a package used by many things (e.g. dropping qt5 when qt6 is out and has been stabilized) * changes that are likely to break other people's hardware Cooker is usually open for all types of development, but can be frozen at some times to consolidate efforts on one branch." IMO changes like "(e.g. Xorg -> wayland, Qt 5 -> Qt 6, wpa_supplicant -> iwd, systemd -> any other init system, ...)" should not be discovered by users or contributors after a system update. This stuff really, really, really, needs to be discussed on and agreed on as a group. To do this we need to all be communicating in the same place. We might also need to consider tightening things further and make it policy that such "major system component" changes simply should not be made until they are announced in TC-Meeting so people are not surprised by such changes. The advantage to announcing these and other changes in TC-Meeting is that there are written logs which one would hope would eliminate any confusion or disagreement. So for NetworkManager we need to again revert the changes made to what we as a group agreed upon. Agreed because iwd still does not work with a lot of chipsets. If this is something to be tried in Cooker so developers can work on it then this should be discussed and announced so others using cooker aren't surprised after upgrading a package as happened to many folks yesterday. And as a group we need to discuss the absolute paramount importance of following this documentation: https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/Policies/Repository_Policies, if not in fact modifying this as suggested to include announcing major changes in TC-Meeting. Note: The statement or comment "iwd still does not work with a lot of chipsets" is made because this is what more than one developer has told me. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] 4.0 final candidate -- UI issues
On 6/15/19 2:19 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: On 6/15/19 10:53 AM, Ben Bullard wrote: On 6/15/19 10:50 AM, Ben Bullard wrote: On 6/15/19 10:44 AM, Ben Bullard wrote: On 6/15/19 7:36 AM, rugyada wrote: 7. That can't be everything can it? Really? Devs and QA folks may want to meet in IRC chan some time today in the afternoon CEST to agree on GO for release. wdyt? Devs and QA folks may want to meet in IRC chan some time today in the > afternoon CEST to agree on GO for release. > wdyt? > I'm just now downloading the ISO's so that isn't enough time for me. The ISO's weren't finished building when I went to bed last night. You should stop watching the cooker category and make it silent, to avoid receiving messages twice. Not the point. If one has something they care a great deal about and want to get across to other people how things look matters. If you could make the Cooker read only forum render things like they do in text e-mails that would be awesome and would make sense and work for me. As far as transparency that is or should be a non issue. People can read the ML archives if they want to know what is going on. I've been doing exactly that for many years. So the forum category is just a lousy substitute for reading the ML archives and an unnecessary irritant. Or if it is really that important to decide this afternoon CEST then I can save myself some time and not do anymore testing... This is the kind of crap I'm talking about. I swear I sent my e-mail to this thread Re: [cooker] 4.0 final candidate -- UI issues. But in the forum it shows up in another thread. WTF is happening??? I'm really busy try to test and get ready for final release and don't have time for this. This is just horrible. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] 4.0 final candidate -- UI issues
On 6/15/19 7:36 AM, rugyada wrote: 7. That can't be everything can it? Really? Devs and QA folks may want to meet in IRC chan some time today in the afternoon CEST to agree on GO for release. wdyt? Devs and QA folks may want to meet in IRC chan some time today in the > afternoon CEST to agree on GO for release. > wdyt? > I'm just now downloading the ISO's so that isn't enough time for me. The ISO's weren't finished building when I went to bed last night. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] 4.0 final candidate -- UI issues
On 6/12/19 8:27 AM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: Hi, just pretended to be a "stupid" user looking around the 4.0 image (in live mode so far), there's a few things I think we may want to change: * In the favorites on the left side of the K menu, there's a good chance people will have no idea what "Falkon" is - so they may go looking for a browser with little success. Maybe we should just change the desktop file to say "Name=Falkon Browser" or something similarly obvious? Or maybe patch the favorites bar to display the GenericName rather than the Name for the tooltip? * In the menu, we have Education > Math and Education > Science -- this is good, but they both contain the exact same things. That makes it a little weird... * Internet in the K menu is rather cluttered with things 99% of people will neither use nor understand and stuff most people will use only once. "Contact Print Theme Editor", "Contact Theme Editor", "KDE IM Log Viewer", "KMail Header Theme Editor", "KTnef", "lftp", "PIM Setting Exporter", "Sieve Editor" should probably all move to a submenu (maybe kget as well, given most people will use it indirectly?), and maybe KRDC and Krfb need a better description (again switch to GenericName?) * Konverstation is there and kvirc isn't, when most people I've talked to prefer kvirc - should we switch? * Office menu -> similar to Internet, too many not generally useful things like "Contact Print THeme Editor", "Contact Theme Editor", "KMail Header Theme Editor", "KTnef", "PIM Setting Exporter", "Sieve Editor" * Settings -> dnfdragora and dnfdragora-updater in Settings? Wouldn't they fit better in Utilities? * Lost & Found -- probably shouldn't be there unless people install stuff with bad desktop files -- the USB formatter that's there needs the desktop file fixed Any thoughts on this? Should I fix them, or do people have objections? ttyl bero -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists And it did not come out like I wanted. Cluck I give up. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] 4.0 final candidate ISO
On 6/11/19 11:49 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: On 6/11/19 11:15 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: On 6/11/19 8:58 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: znver1 iso done too: https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/4.0/products/68/product_build_lists/2541 I've fixed the build scripts for i686, but the i686 iso is currently failing on dependencies because i686 versions of ldb, samba, mpv and libreoffice are out of sync with the other arches. Except for those 4 packages, looks like the i686 tree is actually in a usable state. ttyl bero On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 03:11 CEST, "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" wrote: Hi, build scripts are finally fixed, and I could build an ISO from the 4.0 branch. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/4.0/products/67/product_build_lists/2535 I'm still downloading it myself, so no guarantees that it'll even boot -- but it should be worth testing. QA will need a bit of time for testing, but with any luck we can unfreeze cooker soon. 4.1 plans should be the main subject of tomorrow's meeting. ttyl bero -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists This will need to be fixed ASAP. This is using Manual Partitioning and an existing /boot/efi partition. There is no esp flag to select. https://imgur.com/a/cqHy3pL I'll try to get a bug report on this tomorrow but I'm gonna be busy for next 2 1/2 days with life stuff. I did a hardware install and it worked (ISO 2535) and it did install grub2 menu ect. So it appears as if there is no functional problem it is an error messages that should not be there. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] 4.0 final candidate ISO
On 6/11/19 11:15 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: On 6/11/19 8:58 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: znver1 iso done too: https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/4.0/products/68/product_build_lists/2541 I've fixed the build scripts for i686, but the i686 iso is currently failing on dependencies because i686 versions of ldb, samba, mpv and libreoffice are out of sync with the other arches. Except for those 4 packages, looks like the i686 tree is actually in a usable state. ttyl bero On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 03:11 CEST, "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" wrote: Hi, build scripts are finally fixed, and I could build an ISO from the 4.0 branch. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/4.0/products/67/product_build_lists/2535 I'm still downloading it myself, so no guarantees that it'll even boot -- but it should be worth testing. QA will need a bit of time for testing, but with any luck we can unfreeze cooker soon. 4.1 plans should be the main subject of tomorrow's meeting. ttyl bero -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists This will need to be fixed ASAP. This is using Manual Partitioning and an existing /boot/efi partition. There is no esp flag to select. https://imgur.com/a/cqHy3pL I'll try to get a bug report on this tomorrow but I'm gonna be busy for next 2 1/2 days with life stuff. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] 4.0 final candidate ISO
On 6/11/19 8:58 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: znver1 iso done too: https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/4.0/products/68/product_build_lists/2541 I've fixed the build scripts for i686, but the i686 iso is currently failing on dependencies because i686 versions of ldb, samba, mpv and libreoffice are out of sync with the other arches. Except for those 4 packages, looks like the i686 tree is actually in a usable state. ttyl bero On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 03:11 CEST, "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" wrote: Hi, build scripts are finally fixed, and I could build an ISO from the 4.0 branch. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/4.0/products/67/product_build_lists/2535 I'm still downloading it myself, so no guarantees that it'll even boot -- but it should be worth testing. QA will need a bit of time for testing, but with any luck we can unfreeze cooker soon. 4.1 plans should be the main subject of tomorrow's meeting. ttyl bero -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists This will need to be fixed ASAP. This is using Manual Partitioning and an existing /boot/efi partition. There is no esp flag to select. https://imgur.com/a/cqHy3pL -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
[cooker] Don’t upgrade right now.
https://forum.openmandriva.org/ Don’t upgrade right now. Latest NetworkManager packages break Qualcomm Atheros and other wifi devices We will let you know when this issue gets sorted. If you have any Qualcomm Atheros or any older Intel and some newer Intel wifi devices updating networkmanager and related wifi packages it will break your wifi connection. It is impossible to know at this time all the hardware that may be affected so to be safe just don’t update until we lift this ban. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting 29-05-2019 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
On 5/28/19 11:58 AM, rugyada wrote: Topics 1. Report: ABF, cooker 2. Lx4 GA release issues/progress/ETA 3. Maintenance of rolling after release 4. Mirror manager issues/progress/ETA 5. nvidia binary drivers (volunteers wanted) 6. EOL of OMLx3 7. AIB 8. AOB Minues: https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-05-29/openmandriva-cooker.2019-05-29-16.02.html Log: https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-05-29/openmandriva-cooker.2019-05-29-16.02.log.html -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting 22-05-2019 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
On 5/22/19 6:46 AM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: Hi, not sure if I can make it on time - I'm driving to my father's place and may still be driving at meeting time. Just in case I'm not there: * Cooker/4.0 looks good to me - main thing right now is we need to split the trees: Cooker needs to be copied to both 4.0 and rolling, rock (or rocking?) doesn't need to be created because a symlink in the filesystem will do that one best (pointing at 4.0 initially, then at 4.1 when it's released, etc.) * Fairly important to do before the release: Finish and put in om-repo-picker (that's on me). Fixing rust and thunderbird would be nice too (not on me, too much to do with om-repo-picker). * I've done a mass build of unsupported, and it's not looking too good (though not as scary as I feared): https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/mass_builds/206 Of course, this is the unsupported repo, so nothing in there should block the release -- but if anyone has too much time on their hands, fixing some of the failures (and deciding which failed packages are simply so obsolete that we need to drop them) would be a good thing to do. * Should we make an announcement of the planned release model changes before making the release? It would get us into the news twice, and probably generate more attention when the release finally happens * Good news with libreoffice: I've fixed the "crashes the X server on startup on some hardware" and "needs to turn off OpenGL on some hardware" issues as well as LO not detecting OpenJDK -- so we should finally be good on that one. * And of course, Chwido and Laska say woof woof to everyone. (I think it means "We want to bite Brokenbuntu".) ttyl bero On Tuesday, May 21, 2019 15:51 CEST, rugyada wrote: Topics 1. Report: ABF, cooker 2. Lx4 GA release issues/progress/ETA 3. Mirror manager issues/progress/ETA 4. Quick review of last week topics and discuss what's left if any 5. AIB 6. AOB -- Best regards, Cristina -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists Meeting logs. https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-05-22/openmandriva-cooker.2019-05-22-15.02.html https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-05-22/openmandriva-cooker.2019-05-22-15.02.log.html -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] KDE Frameworks 5.58
On 5/13/19 9:57 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: It's late in the cycle given the RC is released, but this looks like something worth updating. Looking at the changelog, it's a load of bugfixes and little else. https://kde.org/announcements/kde-frameworks-5.58.0.php ttyl bero -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists I think we should be deciding, perhaps in TC-Meeting tomorrow if we can we release what we have Sunday as Final/Public/GA release. Then update KFrameworks after release. There is one possible constraint against releasing Sunday that I'm aware of and that is that we don't have repos split. Doesn't seem at all like a good idea to release until repos split. But aren't we ready enough otherwise? Another constraint might be that we don't have a mirrormanager ready, or do we? -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting today 08-05-2019 16:00 CEST 15:00 GMT
On 5/8/19 9:51 AM, Ben Bullard wrote: On 5/8/19 9:47 AM, Ben Bullard wrote: On 5/8/19 6:04 AM, rugyada wrote: Please note the meeting will start 1 hour earlier than the usual time. Topics 1. Report: ABF, cooker 2. Lx4 RC release issues/progress/ETA 3. Mirror manager issues/progress/ETA 4. Repositories split 5. AIB 6. AOB A.I.B. for today: This morning there are 28 open bugs against Cooker. This should link to that list: https://issues.openmandriva.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open___id=41028=Importance=Cooker_format=specific Most are Package requests for updated packages or packages needing rebuild for dependencies. A few are for new software as well. Don't know if others here consider this one important to get fixed before RC release: Thunderbird will not install (libhunspell-1.6.so.0) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2476 Perhaps an addenda to A.I.B. There are these packages that probably need rebuild to update dependencies. The significance is that they are in our OM-Welcome application. https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/omlx-4-0-oma-welcome-fixes-and-changes/2131/31 And one more thing to add. There is one operational bug that is a concern but I don't know how much hardware will be affected or if 5.1 will have this issue. It is worth keeping an eye on though. Boot failure with kernel 5.0.8 and after. https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2463 -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting today 08-05-2019 16:00 CEST 15:00 GMT
On 5/8/19 6:04 AM, rugyada wrote: Please note the meeting will start 1 hour earlier than the usual time. Topics 1. Report: ABF, cooker 2. Lx4 RC release issues/progress/ETA 3. Mirror manager issues/progress/ETA 4. Repositories split 5. AIB 6. AOB A.I.B. for today: This morning there are 28 open bugs against Cooker. This should link to that list: https://issues.openmandriva.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open___id=41028=Importance=Cooker_format=specific Most are Package requests for updated packages or packages needing rebuild for dependencies. A few are for new software as well. Don't know if others here consider this one important to get fixed before RC release: Thunderbird will not install (libhunspell-1.6.so.0) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2476 -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Lx 4 ISO update or distro-sync breaks dnf.
On 4/27/19 5:58 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: Basically this bug: error after updating the beta version https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2468 If user installs our ISO from SourceForge and updates then dnf will be broken. There isn't a working ISO on ABF. So perhaps we should not be encouraging anyone to install Lx 4 until we get things back in some working order. Meaning until after we get gpg key issue fixed, mass rebuild done and produce a new ISO and test it internally to be sure it is OK. Bero says running ldconfig should correct his issue. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting today 01-05-2019: 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
On 5/1/19 6:56 AM, Colin Close wrote: Hi All, There will be a TC meeting today at the usual time. I will be unavailable after 18:30 BST so I hope someone will be able to take over when I have to go. Topics 1. Report: ABF, cooker 2. Lx4 Release Progress...Projected Date? 3: AIB 4.: AOB Best, Colin -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/tc-meeting-2019-05-01-report/2653 -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting today 01-05-2019: 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
On 5/1/19 10:02 AM, Ben Bullard wrote: On 5/1/19 6:56 AM, Colin Close wrote: Hi All, There will be a TC meeting today at the usual time. I will be unavailable after 18:30 BST so I hope someone will be able to take over when I have to go. Topics 1. Report: ABF, cooker 2. Lx4 Release Progress...Projected Date? 3: AIB 4.: AOB Best, Colin -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists A.I.B 2019-05-01 Update installed system from Beta release ISO breaks dnf. https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2468 dnf upgrade fails. Updated packages missing. https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2472 Intermittent boot failure with kernel 5.0.8 and 5.0.9 (So far only one user has reported this but on multiple computers.) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2463 Of 27 open Cooker bugs on 04-22 approx 20 are package requests. Some of the others could be dealt with quickly if developers have time for that. I have a file with Lx 3 open bugs that haven't been fixed. I wonder of most of these should be RESOLVED/COOKER with a note to OP to open a new bug if issue persists for them in OM Lx 4.0? The list is by no means complete. Partial list of Lx 3 open bugs. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team There are some Lx 3 bugs that I wonder if they will be fixed in Lx 3. Or should they be changed to Resolved/Cooker and worked on in Cooker. This list is by no means complete. There are currently (04-22) 51 open Lx 3 bugs. I wonder if a lot of them should not either just be closed or RESOLVED/COOKER but don't want to close bugs that we can or should fix. cannot install python-tables due to dependency issues https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2337 new gfortran is breaking lots of libraries https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2243 Invesalius won't install (due to unsatisfied python-itk-numarray) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2358 [Request + Update] Mysql and database Workbenech https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2373 [Request] AV1 encoder / webm https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2376 [request][info] Nextcloud 14.0.2 /etc/httpd/conf/webapps.d/nextcloud.conf https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2377 PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'mcrypt.so' https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2371 Bug in php under apache https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2383 Flatpak cannot add repo(This one might be fixed, need report from OP.) https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2409 aMule occupies the whole RAM in a short when downloading https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2437
[cooker] Lx 4 ISO update or distro-sync breaks dnf.
Basically this bug: error after updating the beta version https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2468 If user installs our ISO from SourceForge and updates then dnf will be broken. There isn't a working ISO on ABF. So perhaps we should not be encouraging anyone to install Lx 4 until we get things back in some working order. Meaning until after we get gpg key issue fixed, mass rebuild done and produce a new ISO and test it internally to be sure it is OK. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Draft: Renaming of contrib repository to unsupported.
On 4/19/19 1:13 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: Howdy folks, The following is meant to be a draft of an announcement for forum "Announcements and Communications". Posting here for comment, approval, or rejection. I have no pride of authorship involved in this. If someone else would like to write an announcement of this that would be wonderful as far as I'm concerned. Title: Renaming of contrib repository to unsupported. Recently in Cooker and for new releases going forward we renamed the contrib repository to unsupported. This change does not affect previous releases like Lx 3 or 2014/2013. The contrib repo historically going back before inception of OMA is meant to consist of packages supported by community members. It is by far the largest repository in terms of number of packages. It is huge. Over time the majority of packages in this repo have been abandoned and are unsupported. A lot are also unsupported upstream. A lot are ancient and unused/unusable in modern Linux. On the other hand there are also a lot of useful and somewhat popular packages that are used and useful to our users. So what does "unsupported" mean in this context? It means not officially supported by OpenMandriva developers. Further it means that OM devs are not obligated to fix or update packages in this repo. It does not mean that OM devs won't fix or update packages in this repo, they will and they do, it means this is among the lowest or their priorities. Done. https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/renaming-of-contrib-repository-to-unsupported/2644 -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] When we package nVidia driver for Lx 4 could we?
On 4/22/19 7:31 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: I would imagine we will be packaging at least the nvida current (short lived?) driver for OM Lx 4. So that caused me to wonder if we could create a warning for the nvida package when user installs it. Thinking out loud so to speak here but something like: "Installing 3rd party software involves implied user responsibility. nVida proprietary drivers are kernel specific so the the driver package must match the kernel you are using. If a new kernel is installed and the corresponding nvidia driver package is not installed at the same time user won't be able to use proprietary driver with that kernel until the new nvida driver is available. It is the users responsibility to pay attention to this. However user may continue to use the previous kernel until the new nvida driver for the new kernel is available." And the warning of course would require user to select OK, or Accept, or something like that before installing the package. WDYT? FWIW: Looking for *how* to do this I came across this: https://github.com/luebking/qarma but we don't have this that I can find. I'm hoping someone else here can direct me to some application/applications that can do this? Or is this something we turn over to our outstanding artwork department? -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
[cooker] When we package nVidia driver for Lx 4 could we?
I would imagine we will be packaging at least the nvida current (short lived?) driver for OM Lx 4. So that caused me to wonder if we could create a warning for the nvida package when user installs it. Thinking out loud so to speak here but something like: "Installing 3rd party software involves implied user responsibility. nVida proprietary drivers are kernel specific so the the driver package must match the kernel you are using. If a new kernel is installed and the corresponding nvidia driver package is not installed at the same time user won't be able to use proprietary driver with that kernel until the new nvida driver is available. It is the users responsibility to pay attention to this. However user may continue to use the previous kernel until the new nvida driver for the new kernel is available." And the warning of course would require user to select OK, or Accept, or something like that before installing the package. WDYT? -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
[cooker] Draft: Renaming of contrib repository to unsupported.
Howdy folks, The following is meant to be a draft of an announcement for forum "Announcements and Communications". Posting here for comment, approval, or rejection. I have no pride of authorship involved in this. If someone else would like to write an announcement of this that would be wonderful as far as I'm concerned. Title: Renaming of contrib repository to unsupported. Recently in Cooker and for new releases going forward we renamed the contrib repository to unsupported. This change does not affect previous releases like Lx 3 or 2014/2013. The contrib repo historically going back before inception of OMA is meant to consist of packages supported by community members. It is by far the largest repository in terms of number of packages. It is huge. Over time the majority of packages in this repo have been abandoned and are unsupported. A lot are also unsupported upstream. A lot are ancient and unused/unusable in modern Linux. On the other hand there are also a lot of useful and somewhat popular packages that are used and useful to our users. So what does "unsupported" mean in this context? It means not officially supported by OpenMandriva developers. Further it means that OM devs are not obligated to fix or update packages in this repo. It does not mean that OM devs won't fix or update packages in this repo, they will and they do, it means this is among the lowest or their priorities. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting today 17-04-2019: 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-04-17/openmandriva-cooker.2019-04-17-15.49.html https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-04-17/openmandriva-cooker.2019-04-17-15.49.log.html Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 4/17/19 4:24 AM, Colin Close wrote: Hi All, A potentially contentious agenda this week so lets be patient and try to deal with issues in a positive way. I will be unavailable after 18:30 BST so I hope we can get started promptly. Topics 1. Report: ABF, cooker 2. Is the release process working? 2. Lx4 Release where do we go from here? 3: AIB 4.: AOB Best, Colin -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [OMA] [English/Cooker (development)] [cooker] PGO xz
Hi, FWIW: If this were something that only affects Cooker I never would have said a word. What goes in Cooker we rightly leave to developers as far as I know. And in fact I appreciate your initiative on this. This is not about whether this is good of bad. Not at all. It is about not making such changes at this point in release cycle. Plus even though you and bero find no regressions a change like this needs more testing before it goes to "prime time". We have seen OM make changes like this before only to discover unintended consequences. So my concern is protecting OM Lx 4.0 from possible unintended consequences. I do think something like this should be deployed in Cooker to see how well it works and sort through any issues that may come up. But only after repos split so any even remotely possible unintended consequence do not affect OM Lx 4.0 release. Thanks to all for your consideration of this, to me, very important point. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 4/5/19 2:52 AM, Tomasz Paweł Gajc via __Forum OMA__ wrote: [TPG] TPG <https://forum.openmandriva.org/u/tpg> Tomasz Paweł Gajc <https://forum.openmandriva.org/u/tpg> cooker April 5 Ben i did lot of tests and found no regressions. Same did bero. Visit Topic <https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/cooker-pgo-xz/2558/3> or reply to this email to respond. In Reply To [ben79] ben79 <https://forum.openmandriva.org/u/ben79> Ben Bullard <https://forum.openmandriva.org/u/ben79> Community Helper April 4 Also it is not an alleged RC release. We will be doing a RC I hope very soon. Use of that word was frustration creeping in to my post. Previous Replies [ben79] ben79 <https://forum.openmandriva.org/u/ben79> Ben Bullard <https://forum.openmandriva.org/u/ben79> Community Helper April 4 Also it is not an alleged RC release. We will be doing a RC I hope very soon. Use of that word was frustration creeping in to my post. [ben79] ben79 <https://forum.openmandriva.org/u/ben79> Ben Bullard <https://forum.openmandriva.org/u/ben79> Community Helper April 3 This may be a great idea but doing this right before an alleged RC release is terrible. Y’all are taking all or our testing and throwing it in the trash and telling us to start over. Please don’t do this now. Visit Topic <https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/cooker-pgo-xz/2558/3> or reply to this email to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, click here <https://forum.openmandriva.org/email/unsubscribe/6eab88ae1ec5bc533933751d29ea9c12b6f4f0507741e951fcd527e2a8d8a287>.
[cooker] fdrt reports ABF back in business.
Howdy folks, fdrt reports ABF back up. For ABF access fdrt says to add this to your /etc/hosts: 81.221.122.240 abf.openmandriva.org abf-downloads.openmandriva.org and sign up again as if a new account. And let anyone know that I have missed and I'm sure my list is not close to complete. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
Re: [cooker] PGO xz
Also it is not an alleged RC release. We will be doing a RC I hope very soon. Use of that word was frustration creeping in to my post. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 4/3/19 4:20 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: This may be a great idea but doing this right before an alleged RC release is terrible. Y'all are taking all or our testing and throwing it in the trash and telling us to start over. Please don't do this now. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
Re: [cooker] Spacefm and Lnav packages (contrib/unsupported repo) will not update.
So thanks to AngryPenguin for help on both of these packages. They are
built and both install on my 64 bit system. Specefm works lnav does not.
It fails to run with:
lnav: symbol lookup error: lnav: undefined symbol:
_ZN7pcrecpp2RE4InitERKSsPKNS_10RE_OptionsE
if someone wants to fix that great, if not, so be it.
Thanks to Bero's input for making me think and prompting me to review
some bash scripting stuff I learned in a course last year and seem to
have promptly forgotten. Like Grandpa said "to learn it you have to use
it".
**Post-Edit:** I'm bumfoozled by no edit button in Discourse Cooker forum.
Ben Bullard
ben79
OpenMandriva-QA Team
On 3/19/19 1:40 PM, Angry Penguin wrote:
Source file need to be patched. I made this patch and change in .spec
from GTK2 to GTK3 and rename one buildrequires.
Look here
https://github.com/OpenMandrivaAssociation/spacefm/commit/a5381a20d70c25ef9b5ee604629bd37d871afcf8
about Lnav:
It's almost done. Now you need to add unpacked files to .spec. See this:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
usr/share/man/man1/lnav.1.xz
so add this file in spec in %files section.
Should be somethings like:
%{_mandir}/man1/lnav.1.xz
wt., 19 mar 2019 o 17:33 Ben Bullard <mailto:benbullar...@cox.net>> napisał(a):
Also worth mentioning is that if this package is broken as at the
level of it's code that is not something for me to be dealing
with. Me better stick to learning .spec files and updating the
simple and easy to update packages and leave the broken stuff to
people that know what they are doing.
Ben Bullard
ben79
OpenMandriva-QA Team
On 3/19/19 11:30 AM, Ben Bullard wrote:
OK, this is where I admit I don't know how to edit spec files.
"replace major with gnu_dev_major (and add #include
near the beginning of the file if it isn't
there already)" is over my head knowledge wise. Part of the
problem is that in the past when I've studied bash scripting I
learn it in the moment but don't remember what I've learned
because I did not use it. I suspect that is about to change.
How would I write "replace major with gnu_dev_major":
%define gnu_dev_major
and then literally add:
#include
somewhere at beginning of file?
Ben Bullard
ben79
OpenMandriva-QA Team
On 3/19/19 8:19 AM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 13:23 CET, Angry Penguin
<mailto:angrypenguinpol...@gmail.com> wrote:
*Spacefm:*
this: main.c:189:42: error: implicit declaration of function 'major'
is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
not sure here, but you can try this, maybe it help a bit.
%define Werror_cflags %nil
Getting rid of -Werror=implicit-function-declaration just hides an error in
the code.
The better fix is to replace major with gnu_dev_major (and add #include
near the beginning of the file if it isn't there already).
ttyl
bero
--
Cooker mailing-list
https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Spacefm and Lnav packages (contrib/unsupported repo) will not update.
So thanks to AngryPenguin for help on both of these packages. They are
built and both install on my 64 bit system. Specefm works lnav does not.
It fails to run with:
lnav: symbol lookup error: lnav: undefined symbol:
_ZN7pcrecpp2RE4InitERKSsPKNS_10RE_OptionsE
if someone wants to fix that great, if not, so be it.
Thanks to Bero's input for making me think and prompting me to review
some bash scripting stuff I learned in a course last year and seem to
have promptly forgotten. Like Grandpa said "to learn it you have to use
it".
Ben Bullard
ben79
OpenMandriva-QA Team
On 3/19/19 1:40 PM, Angry Penguin wrote:
Source file need to be patched. I made this patch and change in .spec
from GTK2 to GTK3 and rename one buildrequires.
Look here
https://github.com/OpenMandrivaAssociation/spacefm/commit/a5381a20d70c25ef9b5ee604629bd37d871afcf8
about Lnav:
It's almost done. Now you need to add unpacked files to .spec. See this:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
usr/share/man/man1/lnav.1.xz
so add this file in spec in %files section.
Should be somethings like:
%{_mandir}/man1/lnav.1.xz
wt., 19 mar 2019 o 17:33 Ben Bullard <mailto:benbullar...@cox.net>> napisał(a):
Also worth mentioning is that if this package is broken as at the
level of it's code that is not something for me to be dealing
with. Me better stick to learning .spec files and updating the
simple and easy to update packages and leave the broken stuff to
people that know what they are doing.
Ben Bullard
ben79
OpenMandriva-QA Team
On 3/19/19 11:30 AM, Ben Bullard wrote:
OK, this is where I admit I don't know how to edit spec files.
"replace major with gnu_dev_major (and add #include
near the beginning of the file if it isn't
there already)" is over my head knowledge wise. Part of the
problem is that in the past when I've studied bash scripting I
learn it in the moment but don't remember what I've learned
because I did not use it. I suspect that is about to change.
How would I write "replace major with gnu_dev_major":
%define gnu_dev_major
and then literally add:
#include
somewhere at beginning of file?
Ben Bullard
ben79
OpenMandriva-QA Team
On 3/19/19 8:19 AM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 13:23 CET, Angry Penguin
<mailto:angrypenguinpol...@gmail.com> wrote:
*Spacefm:*
this: main.c:189:42: error: implicit declaration of function 'major'
is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
not sure here, but you can try this, maybe it help a bit.
%define Werror_cflags %nil
Getting rid of -Werror=implicit-function-declaration just hides an error in
the code.
The better fix is to replace major with gnu_dev_major (and add #include
near the beginning of the file if it isn't there already).
ttyl
bero
--
Cooker mailing-list
https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Spacefm and Lnav packages (contrib/unsupported repo) will not update.
Also worth mentioning is that if this package is broken as at the level of it's code that is not something for me to be dealing with. Me better stick to learning .spec files and updating the simple and easy to update packages and leave the broken stuff to people that know what they are doing. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 3/19/19 11:30 AM, Ben Bullard wrote: OK, this is where I admit I don't know how to edit spec files. "replace major with gnu_dev_major (and add #include near the beginning of the file if it isn't there already)" is over my head knowledge wise. Part of the problem is that in the past when I've studied bash scripting I learn it in the moment but don't remember what I've learned because I did not use it. I suspect that is about to change. How would I write "replace major with gnu_dev_major": %define gnu_dev_major and then literally add: #include somewhere at beginning of file? Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 3/19/19 8:19 AM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 13:23 CET, Angry Penguin wrote: *Spacefm:* this: main.c:189:42: error: implicit declaration of function 'major' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] not sure here, but you can try this, maybe it help a bit. %define Werror_cflags %nil Getting rid of -Werror=implicit-function-declaration just hides an error in the code. The better fix is to replace major with gnu_dev_major (and add #include near the beginning of the file if it isn't there already). ttyl bero -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Spacefm and Lnav packages (contrib/unsupported repo) will not update.
OK, this is where I admit I don't know how to edit spec files. "replace major with gnu_dev_major (and add #include near the beginning of the file if it isn't there already)" is over my head knowledge wise. Part of the problem is that in the past when I've studied bash scripting I learn it in the moment but don't remember what I've learned because I did not use it. I suspect that is about to change. How would I write "replace major with gnu_dev_major": %define gnu_dev_major and then literally add: #include somewhere at beginning of file? Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 3/19/19 8:19 AM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 13:23 CET, Angry Penguin wrote: *Spacefm:* this: main.c:189:42: error: implicit declaration of function 'major' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] not sure here, but you can try this, maybe it help a bit. %define Werror_cflags %nil Getting rid of -Werror=implicit-function-declaration just hides an error in the code. The better fix is to replace major with gnu_dev_major (and add #include near the beginning of the file if it isn't there already). ttyl bero -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
[cooker] Spacefm and Lnav packages (contrib/unsupported repo) will not update.
Spacefm https://abf.openmandriva.org/build_lists/409390 the root.log starts with DEBUG on second line, I've not seen that before. Of course I'm learning, and don't really know much yet. The build.log and script_output.log both have a lot, I mean a lot of "BUILDSTDERR:". The Lnav package https://abf.openmandriva.org/build_lists/409392 does not seem to even try to build: I'm not sure but this one looks unhappy with mock, or it isn't feeding mock correctly, "Build failed: mock encountered a problem." Or maybe something I'm not seeing. Part of me reporting this is that I hope to learn better how to read to logs to see what is wrong when packages don't build. And also to help 'either update and keep' or identify packages we should remove as unworkable, to damn old, or whatever. Or move them to an archive so someone could work on them at some future time. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
Re: [cooker] Updated chrony package will not install.
Thanks Bero. I've got a ways to go before I understand half of what you
wrote but I did make suggested changes to chrony and now V. 3.4-2
installs here on x86_64 system.
Ben Bullard
ben79
OpenMandriva-QA Team
On 3/18/19 7:34 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 00:14 CET, Ben Bullard wrote:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dJLCFb: line 1: fg: no job control
"fg: no job control" is almost always caused by a bad rpm macro -- an undefined macro
(%xyz) being used in a %post/%postun/... script is expanded to a literal "%xyz" in the
script, which in turn is interpreted as job control by bash.
The usual cause of this in packages that work when built locally is that a
macro is defined by a different package (quite frequently spec-helper or
rpm-helper) that isn't installed into the build environment by default (fix:
add a BuildRequires: in the spec file).
In the particular case of chrony, we have this:
%pre
%_pre_useradd %{name} %{_localstatedir}/lib/%{name} /sbin/nologin
%post
%systemd_post chronyd.service
%preun
%systemd_preun chronyd.service
%postun
%systemd_postun_with_restart chronyd.service
So let's see where the macros come from:
$ grep -r _pre_useradd /usr/lib/rpm /etc/rpm
/etc/rpm/macros.d/rpm-helper.macros:%_pre_useradd() %_add_user_helper %{name}
$1 %{1} %{2} %{3} \
$ grep -r systemd_post /usr/lib/rpm /etc/rpm
/usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.systemd:%systemd_post() \
So in order to fix it, we need to make sure that
/etc/rpm/macros.d/rpm-helper.macros and /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.systemd
are installed.
$ rpm -qf /etc/rpm/macros.d/rpm-helper.macros
/usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.systemd
rpm-helper-0.24.17-9.noarch
systemd-macros-240.20190211-6.x86_64
So in order to fix that package, add
BuildRequires: rpm-helper
BuildRequires: systemd-macros
But actually, there's another problem here (though not as clearly visible) --
systemd_post, systemd_preun and friends are obsolete and have been replaced
with file triggers (they're now run automatically, no need to call them). So
the proper fix is to add only
BuildRequires: rpm-helper
(%_pre_useradd is still needed)
and delete all calls to %systemd_post and friends.
ttyl
bero
--
Cooker mailing-list
https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Updated Harvid package.
Crap, forgot something. It *looks* like harvid wants libx265_169 which is in restricted repo and is not pulled in as a dependency. Should this be a dependency? Since it is in restricted? Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 3/18/19 6:25 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: I updated harvid to v. 0.8.3-1. It installs fine on a x86_64 system but I'm not sure how to test if it works? Or if it's OK to update packages like this and post on forum for users to test it? -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
[cooker] Updated Harvid package.
I updated harvid to v. 0.8.3-1. It installs fine on a x86_64 system but I'm not sure how to test if it works? Or if it's OK to update packages like this and post on forum for users to test it? -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
Re: [cooker] Updated chrony package will not install.
Obviously I don't know how to post the code in an e-mail in a way that will show up in Discourse... Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 3/18/19 6:14 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: I'm attempting to learn how to update packages. Got a list of *some* contrib/unsupported packages that are not up to date. One such package was chrony so I updated it to V. 3.4 but it will not install. I wonder if I missed something that needed changing in Github? Or did I do something else wrong? Here's cli output: # dnf install chrony Last metadata expiration check: 0:15:45 ago on Mon 18 Mar 2019 05:49:39 PM CDT. Dependencies resolved. = Package Architecture Version Repository Size = Installing: chrony x86_64 3.4-1 cooker-x86_64-contrib 192 k Transaction Summary = Install 1 Package Total download size: 192 k Installed size: 389 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: chrony-3.4-1-omv4000.x86_64.rpm 217 kB/s | 192 kB 00:00 - Total 217 kB/s | 192 kB 00:00 Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Preparing : 1/1 Running scriptlet: chrony-3.4-1.x86_64 1/1 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dJLCFb: line 1: fg: no job control error: %prein(chrony-3.4-1.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 Error in PREIN scriptlet in rpm package chrony Verifying : chrony-3.4-1.x86_64 1/1 Failed: chrony-3.4-1.x86_64 Error: Transaction failed Also I don't know what this: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kmrkFt: line 1: fg: no job control means but there isn't anything 'rpm-tmp' in '/var/tmp'. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
[cooker] Updated chrony package will not install.
I'm attempting to learn how to update packages. Got a list of *some* contrib/unsupported packages that are not up to date. One such package was chrony so I updated it to V. 3.4 but it will not install. I wonder if I missed something that needed changing in Github? Or did I do something else wrong? Here's cli output: # dnf install chrony Last metadata expiration check: 0:15:45 ago on Mon 18 Mar 2019 05:49:39 PM CDT. Dependencies resolved. = Package Architecture Version Repository Size = Installing: chrony x86_64 3.4-1 cooker-x86_64-contrib 192 k Transaction Summary = Install 1 Package Total download size: 192 k Installed size: 389 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: chrony-3.4-1-omv4000.x86_64.rpm 217 kB/s | 192 kB 00:00 - Total 217 kB/s | 192 kB 00:00 Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Preparing : 1/1 Running scriptlet: chrony-3.4-1.x86_64 1/1 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dJLCFb: line 1: fg: no job control error: %prein(chrony-3.4-1.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 Error in PREIN scriptlet in rpm package chrony Verifying : chrony-3.4-1.x86_64 1/1 Failed: chrony-3.4-1.x86_64 Error: Transaction failed Also I don't know what this: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kmrkFt: line 1: fg: no job control means but there isn't anything 'rpm-tmp' in '/var/tmp'. -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting today 06-03-2019: 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
Hi, I may not make it to meeting. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 3/13/19 7:11 AM, Colin Close wrote: Hi All, There will be a TC meeting at the usual time today. Here is a provisional agenda. I will be unable to chair the meeting. I am moving to Devon next Tuesday and as you can imagine things are a little busy. I will not be available next Wednesday 20th March this is the day when the removals men will be delivering out belongings!! I hope Bero or Ben will chair I hope to be back in the seat the following week if intenet connection permits. I have put an item on the agenda which may provide some interesting debate. Here's a bit of background. I have been working on our python stack recently in order to provide the necessary packages to support pgadmin4 the workbench tool for postgresql. This tool relies heavily on python-flask for it's web interface for which we do not have the necessary packages. I have started to create the necessary packages to satisfy the dependencies and this has led to a never ending list of dependencies on packages we don't have. A typical example of the problem is that the work involved updating python- setuptools which while an existing package it was not new enough to compile python-pytest (needed dep) To do just this small job I have created four new packages so far (I'm not finished) in order to satisfy the upgrade. So far fortunately these packages have no deps of their own. If I could have been able to work with pip in a virtual environment that contained a specfile generator then it would in theory be possible to generate the specfiles in one go as pip's dep generator would have fetched them. There are already programs that generate spec files from python packages (py2rpm) If this were to be combined with pip and a virtual env it may be possible to ease the creation of python packages. It may even be possibe to generate automatic package upgrades. Is i this or something like it a pratical proposition? Topics 1. Report: ABF, cooker 2. Lx4 beta Release issues/progress 3 Should we hack python pip to help us build quick and easy python rpms. 4: AIB 5: LxQt iso 6.: AOB Best, Colin -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting today 27-02-2019: 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
What I mean is there are no links posted on the Cooker ML forum thingy which is where I wanted them for users to access. Posting these has become sort of a tradition now so perhaps we should post them on another forum? Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 2/28/19 7:08 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: As you can see I can't post the links to meeting summary and meeting log the way we are set up now. So do it yourself. That's like the user support approach of "Feel free to provide your own patches". Or maybe there is some way to do this and I don't know it yet? Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 2/28/19 7:00 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: Meeting summary. https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-02-27/openmandriva-cooker.2019-02-27-17.12.html Meeting log. https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-02-27/openmandriva-cooker.2019-02-27-17.12.log.html -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
Re: [cooker] TC Meeting today 27-02-2019: 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
As you can see I can't post the links to meeting summary and meeting log the way we are set up now. So do it yourself. That's like the user support approach of "Feel free to provide your own patches". Or maybe there is some way to do this and I don't know it yet? Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 2/28/19 7:00 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: Meeting summary. https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-02-27/openmandriva-cooker.2019-02-27-17.12.html Meeting log. https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-02-27/openmandriva-cooker.2019-02-27-17.12.log.html -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
[cooker] TC Meeting today 27-02-2019: 17:00 CEST 16:00 GMT
Meeting summary. https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-02-27/openmandriva-cooker.2019-02-27-17.12.html Meeting log. https://chwido.openmandriva.org/meetings/openmandriva-cooker/2019-02-27/openmandriva-cooker.2019-02-27-17.12.log.html -- Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team
Re: [cooker] Lx4 Lxqt iso ?
On 2/25/19 2:58 PM, Angry Penguin wrote: Let's do as we announced, that is ISO with LXQT fully usable. Maybe not rich in software but at least with the basic packages from each important category. My suggestion: Web browser: Falkon or Chromium or Midori Our chromium package seems thoroughly bleeped up. Midori is GTK. The only reason for Falkon is that it keeps things Qt. E-mail client: Kube (or claws mails but this is gtk...) + few other I have multiple e-mail accounts and have tried Kube. For me Kube is useless. A complete waste of time. If we're going to do anything gtk like claws and Midori we would be beter off with the much more widely used FF and T-birb combo.
Re: [cooker] CC test
Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 2/25/19 3:28 PM, Gabriel C wrote: Please ignore :) -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Lx4 Lxqt iso ?
If we are going to include a bunch of apps we should include Quassel for IRC. Kvirc is to much work for OpenMandriva users to cope with. ;-) -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
Re: [cooker] Lx4 Lxqt iso ?
Ho hi, Or maybe build the first ISO with just lxqt desktop, some system tools and a browser and nothing else. Then let users or testers tell us what they want? Ergo "This is our lightweight version so user should install only software that user wants". This would make the ISO easier to develop and trouble shoot I would think. I say this thinking that Lumina desktop may be dead and a version with Lumina is no longer under consideration? Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 2/25/19 1:31 PM, Ben Bullard wrote: Hi ho, Gabriel you are a brave man to take this on, lxqt seems like a big hot mess right now. Browser = I suppose Falkon In general = seems like the lxqt one should have less like maybe no office suite. Also In the past our lxqt desktop required networkmanager-applet which is a gnome software. I always thought that was odd like lxqt devs either never finished developing their desktop or they forgot the qt in the name. So if there is a way to have NM available to connect wifi without any gnome software that would be good, if that is even possible. (And of course I'm assuming this is done by lxqt devs not OM devs so I may be incorrect?) Next question is why we have a mix of versions? Some are .13 and some are .14 that seems odd. Developers may have a better or different idea on this next point. To have much of any kind of useful desktop it takes basically all the lxqt packages, I think out of 17 total lxqt packages (excluding libs which should install as dependency) it will need 13-15 of them by default. Or possibly all except lxqt-panel-devel and lxqt-build-tools. lxqt-powermanagement seemed useless in the past. Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 2/25/19 12:20 PM, Gabriel C wrote: Hey guys , right now we only got working plasma5 iso up2 beta. What should the Lxqt iso looks like ? Core lxqt+what-apps,what browser ? etc ? I would like to start cleaning up iso script to build a working lxqt iso but first I would like to know what should go in. Regards, Gabriel C -- Cooker mailing-list https://www.openmandriva.org/lists
