Re: [cooker] Use Thin LTO
Any news on this? Have you discussed that idea? czw., 22 sie 2019, 02:12 użytkownik Colin Close napisał: > Hi Tomek, > > This looks quite interesting as although ThinLto reults in some slower > executables this slight disadvantage is balanced out by significant > improvements in build time and memory consumption. With the prospect of > further optimisation in later releases it could be worthwhile choice > assuming there are no unseen gotcha's. > > Best, > > Colin > > > > On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 14:46:07 BST Tomasz Gajc wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > what do you think to start to use by default -flto=thin ? > > > We may benefit from using thiner LTO objects. > > > > > > More info can be found here: > > > https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThinLTO.html > > > http://blog.llvm.org/2016/06/thinlto-scalable-and-incremental-lto.html > > > > > > > >
Re: [cooker] Use Thin LTO
Hi Tomek, This looks quite interesting as although ThinLto reults in some slower executables this slight disadvantage is balanced out by significant improvements in build time and memory consumption. With the prospect of further optimisation in later releases it could be worthwhile choice assuming there are no unseen gotcha's. Best, Colin On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 14:46:07 BST Tomasz Gajc wrote: > Hi, > > what do you think to start to use by default -flto=thin ? > We may benefit from using thiner LTO objects. > > More info can be found here: > https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThinLTO.html > http://blog.llvm.org/2016/06/thinlto-scalable-and-incremental-lto.html >
[cooker] Use Thin LTO
Hi, what do you think to start to use by default -flto=thin ? We may benefit from using thiner LTO objects. More info can be found here: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThinLTO.html http://blog.llvm.org/2016/06/thinlto-scalable-and-incremental-lto.html
