On Qui, 2016-10-13 at 10:56 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:13:55 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 08:25 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, Octob
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:13:55 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 08:25 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:21:15 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dne 10.10.2
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:13:55 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 08:25 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:21:15 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dne 10.10.2
On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 08:25 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:21:15 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Dne 10.10.2016 v 18:45 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Could we have cop
On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 08:25 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:21:15 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > Dne 10.10.2016 v 18:45 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > >
> > > Could we have copr for F25 ? and in the future for other
> > > branched
> > > repos ? Please .
> > There
On 10/10/2016 04:39 PM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> The current state is that 'rawhide' is going to be renamed to f26. I'll
> additionally setup aliases (or redirects) from
>
> /results/*/*/fedora-rawhide-$basearch/ *to* /results/*/*/fedora-26-$basearch/
What happens when f27 chroot is created? Will
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:21:15 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 10.10.2016 v 18:45 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > Could we have copr for F25 ? and in the future for other branched
> > repos ? Please .
>
> There is fedora-25-* in Copr for more than month already.
I guess I understand; Sérg
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:21:46 AM CEST Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 08:17 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:11:16 AM CEST Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >> Since there are no scratch builds in Copr, "testing builds" need to be
> >> simulated by building in sepa
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:11:16 AM CEST Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Since there are no scratch builds in Copr, "testing builds" need to be
> simulated by building in separate Copr project, with appropriate repos
> added and createrepo disabled. Doing "real builds" is almost the same
> thing.
S
Dne 10.10.2016 v 18:45 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> Could we have copr for F25 ? and in the future for other branched
> repos ? Please .
There is fedora-25-* in Copr for more than month already.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
___
On 10/11/2016 08:17 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:11:16 AM CEST Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> Since there are no scratch builds in Copr, "testing builds" need to be
>> simulated by building in separate Copr project, with appropriate repos
>> added and createrepo disabled.
On 10/11/2016 07:05 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Re-citing Mikolaj's comment:
> | Sounds like you are asking for Koschei for Copr.
> | We are working on first bits of integration right now.
> | See: https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues/113
>
> On Friday, October 7, 2016 5:29:21 PM CEST cl...@r
Re-citing Mikolaj's comment:
| Sounds like you are asking for Koschei for Copr.
| We are working on first bits of integration right now.
| See: https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues/113
On Friday, October 7, 2016 5:29:21 PM CEST cl...@redhat.com wrote:
> I am very much asking for that. Thanks
Hi Sérgio,
On Monday, October 10, 2016 5:45:02 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Could we have copr for F25 ? and in the future for other branched
> repos ? Please .
>
> Thanks !
What is wrong with F25 at this point?
Pavel
>
> On Seg, 2016-10-10 at 16:39 +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
> > The cur
On Monday, October 10, 2016 11:55:48 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> The lighttpd aliases/redirects will be good to keep copr project's baseurls
> with *rawhide* in it working. You might want to use those.
I still don't get it, even the resolution of the bugzilla from this
thread...
The question
The lighttpd aliases/redirects will be good to keep copr project's baseurls
with *rawhide* in it working. You might want to use those.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Monday, October 10, 2016 4:39:11 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> > The current state is
Could we have copr for F25 ? and in the future for other branched
repos ? Please .
Thanks !
On Seg, 2016-10-10 at 16:39 +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
> The current state is that 'rawhide' is going to be renamed to f26.
> I'll additionally setup aliases (or redirects) from
> /results/*/*/fedor
Hi Michal,
On Monday, October 10, 2016 4:39:11 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> The current state is that 'rawhide' is going to be renamed to f26.
>
> I'll additionally setup aliases (or redirects) from
>
> /results/*/*/fedora-rawhide-$basearch/ *to* /results/*/*/fedora-26-$basearch/
>
> so that
The current state is that 'rawhide' is going to be renamed to f26. I'll
additionally setup aliases (or redirects) from
/results/*/*/fedora-rawhide-$basearch/ *to* /results/*/*/fedora-26-$basearch/
so that no links are lost.
There will be no need to rebuild any existing builds.
On Thu, Oct 6,
I am very much asking for that. Thanks!
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
On Thursday, October 6, 2016 6:34:02 PM CEST Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 10/06/2016 06:30 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 6, 2016 8:55:29 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > RFE2: It would be nice to have a possibility (opt-in) to do package
> > rebuilds at (before?) branching time
On Qui, 2016-10-06 at 08:55 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to highlight
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381790
>
> Right now we have rawhide target and when new chroot (e.g. F26) we
> copy everything from rawhide to F26.
>
> This RFE as for the reverse. I.e. there is
On 10/06/2016 06:30 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, October 6, 2016 8:55:29 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> RFE2: It would be nice to have a possibility (opt-in) to do package
> rebuilds at (before?) branching time. IOW mass-rebuild alternative .. and
> notify
> owners that his package do
On Thursday, October 6, 2016 8:55:29 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to highlight
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381790
>
> Right now we have rawhide target and when new chroot (e.g. F26) we copy
> everything from rawhide to F26.
This is really good approach, IMO; I
On 10/06/2016 08:55 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to highlight
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381790
>
> Right now we have rawhide target and when new chroot (e.g. F26) we copy
> everything from rawhide to F26.
>
> This RFE as for the reverse. I.e. there is no rawhid
25 matches
Mail list logo
