Neal, thanks for your patience.
Yes, these are the arguments I understand.
Thanks a lot,
-Ulf
Am 27.10.2009 17:36, Neal Gafter schrieb:
Ulf-
Very good. How what happens if you change the return type, or add a
throws clause, or change its access modifier (JLS 8.4.8.3)? In all
three cases
Mandy Chung wrote:
Duplicating this method may be a better option for this case (that I
typically try to avoid). I can make this change.
The new webrev at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/6895456/webrev.01/
OK, I think I can live with this. While you are there, maybe we should
replace C
Ulf-
Very good. How what happens if you change the return type, or add a throws
clause, or change its access modifier (JLS 8.4.8.3)? In all three cases it
must be a compile-time error.
-Neal
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
> It works fine too.
> Is coded:
>
>
> public class
It works fine too.
Is coded:
public class MyClass1 {
private final int value;
public MyClass1(int value) {
this.value = value;
}
public static int hashCode(Object key) {
return 3;
}
//public static int hashCode(MyClass1 obj) {
//return 3 * obj.value;
//
Duplicating this method may be a better option for this case (that I
typically try to avoid). I can make this change.
The new webrev at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/6895456/webrev.01/
Mandy
Try adding
public static hashCode(Object key) {
return 3;
}
to MyClass. Such a class is broken by the proposed change.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Correction:
>
>
> public class MyClass1 {
> private final int value;
>
> public MyClass1(int value) {
> t
Alan Bateman wrote:
I agree it would be good to avoid loading/initializing
ObjectStreamClass (as you say, we have to load ObjectStreamField as
the serialPersistentFields is part of Class, String, and other APIs).
My only concern is that ObjectStreamField doesn't seem to be the
right place for
2009/10/27 Alan Eliasen :
> On 10/23/2009 11:01 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> 6622432 is the one of the ones I just pointed to i.e. it's in JDK7.
>> If Alan has a further patch and hasn't even submitted it for
>> inclusion, it's obviously not in.
>
> I had just queried Joe Darcy at Sun abou
Correction:
public class MyClass1 {
private final int value;
public MyClass1(int value) {
this.value = value;
}
public static int hashCode(MyClass1 obj) {
return 3 * obj.value;
}
public static void main(String... args) {
MyClass1 c = new MyClass1(99);
System
Am 26.10.2009 18:43, Joseph D. Darcy schrieb:
Neal Gafter wrote:
You can hardly add any methods to Object, event static methods,
without breaking compatibility, because they get added to every the
overload set if the name is used for methods in existing code.
Indeed, which is why these method
Changeset: 244a6868b440
Author:alanb
Date: 2009-10-27 08:55 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/244a6868b440
6888179: Separate out dependency on CORBA
Reviewed-by: dfuchs
+ src/share/classes/com/sun/jmx/remote/internal/IIOPHelper.java
+ src/share/classes/com/sun/j
Mandy Chung wrote:
Fixed 6895456: Eliminate dependency on java.io.ObjectStreamClass
during boot
Webrev at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/6895456/webrev.00/
java.io.ObjectStreamClass is not needed if not doing serialization.
Move getSignatureClass static method to java.io.ObjectStreamF
On 10/23/2009 11:01 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
6622432 is the one of the ones I just pointed to i.e. it's in JDK7.
If Alan has a further patch and hasn't even submitted it for
inclusion, it's obviously not in.
I had just queried Joe Darcy at Sun about reviewing my patches for
Karatsuba a
13 matches
Mail list logo
