Hi Paul,
I'm mildly opposed to this change - I added comments to the bug.
It looks like you are not the only one. I am outnumbered :-)
The behaviour of ArrayList.remove, and also ArrayList.removeRange, are
outliers [*]. It?s also a rather obscure difference behaviour with likely
Thanks, Alan.
We've done this correctly in our SAP JVM as well as IBM in their J9
but for some reason we've missed the fixed in the initial OpenJDK
port.
Regards,
Volker
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On 27/07/2015 13:54, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Volker,
I doubt there is a test for any of the OS's but is it possible to write
a test that would
compare that string to the version string produced by one of the os
provided tools.
For example uname?
Thanks, Roger
On 7/27/2015 9:29 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Thanks, Alan.
We've done
On 27/07/2015 13:54, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
can somebody please review this tiny fix to get the value of the
'os.version' property correct on AIX:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2015/8132374/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132374
This looks okay to me, assuming
Hi,
can somebody please review this tiny fix to get the value of the
'os.version' property correct on AIX:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2015/8132374/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132374
Thank you and best regards,
Volker
On most operating systems, creating pipelines of processes is simple and
direct.
That same function is missing from the Java Process support and can be
provided by
java.lang.ProcessBuilder by enabling the pipes created for stdout to be
used for standard input when the processes are created.
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062849
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062849. It’s been reviewed by
Brent Christian and Paul Sandoz. Both the changeset and webrev.zip are
attached.
Steve
Hi Steve,
Only a few attachment types, all text, are allowed through to core-libs.
The usual technique is to copy the webrev to cr.openjdk.java.net
frequently with scp.
Roger
On 7/27/2015 1:31 PM, Steve Drach wrote:
Well this is strange. The attachments seem to have been discarded by some
Well this is strange. The attachments seem to have been discarded by some part
of the mail system. I will provide them to anyone who requests them. Sorry
for that.
On Jul 27, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Steve Drach steve.dr...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
Roger co.:
Since you're already on the topic of manipulating pipes, I thought I'd
mention one very small yet very useful potential enhancement.
It would be very handy to be able to specify a NULL/bit-bucket
source/destination for pipes. For the target process' input, the user
can
Hi Volker,
Yes, it looks fine. I did'nt know if it was a reasonable request across
os versions.
Thanks, Roger
On 7/27/2015 1:54 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Roger,
I've added the requested test. See:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2015/8132374.v1/
I've tested it on Solaris
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
My guiding principle here was that argument validation should not result
in side-effects. Thus the state of a collection should remain unchanged if
an exception is thrown due to an invalid argument of an operation.
Seems reasonable.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:09 AM, David M. Lloyd david.ll...@redhat.com
wrote:
Roger co.:
Since you're already on the topic of manipulating pipes, I thought I'd
mention one very small yet very useful potential enhancement.
It would be very handy to be able to specify a
In the past, when I contemplated doing this, I generally thought that there
wasn't enough value in such a feature for the effort, given that one can
start a subprocess shell that supports pipelines. Does this feature pull
its weight?
You don't need this to re-implement emacs in java, which has
Hi Steve,
Is this an FYI or an actual Request for Review? There are processes that
need to be followed for official reviews prior to pushing. If you don't
yet have Author status you will need someone to host your webrev on
cr.openjdk.java.net for you.
Cheers,
David
On 28/07/2015 2:38 AM,
On 24 Jul 2015, at 20:30, Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com wrote:
Hi Steve, pleased to meet you!
(are you a new maintainer of java.util collections?)
I suggested that Steve look at some “simple” issues to build up credits for a
committer role, so i threw this and some others over the
16 matches
Mail list logo
