Can I please get a review for this proposed fix for the issue reported in
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8190753?
The commit here checks for the size of the zip entry before trying to create a
`ByteArrayOutputStream` for that entry's content. A new jtreg test has been
included in this
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:30:56 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
> Hi, can I have a review of this change that adds two new utility methods for
> java.nio.ByteOrder? Looking through the whole JDK codebase, most calls of
> ByteOrder.nativeOrder() is to check if the underlying platform is
> little-endian/big-en
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:30:56 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
> Hi, can I have a review of this change that adds two new utility methods for
> java.nio.ByteOrder? Looking through the whole JDK codebase, most calls of
> ByteOrder.nativeOrder() is to check if the underlying platform is
> little-endian/big-en
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:40:54 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
> Prefer using ByteOrder to compute byte order for StringUTF16 to determining
> byte order by native method StringUTF16.isBigEndian.
Hi Aleksey, do you have a concrete issue/discussion about bootstrapping
problems? I don't see it because I can b
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 23:05:10 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson
wrote:
> Forwardport JDK 17 -> JDK 18
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: a29953d8
Author:Jesper Wilhelmsson
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/a29953d805ac6360bcfe005bcefa60e112788494
Stats: 1925
Forwardport JDK 17 -> JDK 18
-
Commit messages:
- Merge
- 8258746: illegal access to global field _jvmci_old_thread_counters by
terminated thread causes crash
- 8266269: Lookup::accessClass fails with IAE when accessing an arrayClass
with a protected inner class as component clas
Can I please get a review of this proposed fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251329?
As noted in that issue, if a zip filesystem created on top of a jar containing
a "./" entry is "walked" using the `Files.walkFileTree`, it leads to a infinite
never ending iteration (which ultim
On Sun, 30 May 2021 17:30:56 GMT, Markus KARG
wrote:
> This PR-*draft* is **work in progress** and an invitation to discuss a
> possible solution for issue
> [JDK-8265891](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265891). It is *not
> yet* intended for a final review.
>
> As proposed in JDK
