On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 08:17:08 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
>> Short: this patch makes NMT available in custom-launcher scenarios and
>> during gtests. It simplifies NMT initialization. It adds a lot of
>> NMT-specific testing, cleans them up and makes them sideeffect-free.
>>
>> -
>>
>>
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 13:33:07 GMT, Wang Huang wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> Can you do me a favor to review this patch. This patch use `ldp` to
>> implement String.compareTo.
>>
>> * We add a JMH test case
>> * Here is the result of this test case
>>
>> Benchmark
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 22:44:57 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in
>> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections.
>>
>> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 19:05:55 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> `oddPart` contains a lot of info on the `modInverse` output, sometimes it's
> even the same. Clearing it in case the result is sensitive.
>
> No new regression test since it's difficult to access a temporary local
> variable in an internal
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 19:05:55 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> `oddPart` contains a lot of info on the `modInverse` output, sometimes it's
> even the same. Clearing it in case the result is sensitive.
>
> No new regression test since it's difficult to access a temporary local
> variable in an internal
> Hello,
>
> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in
> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections.
>
> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc
>> "the / operator returns the integer closest to zero"
>
>
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 22:41:52 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in
>> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections.
>>
>> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 22:37:12 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in
>> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections.
>>
>> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc
> Hello,
>
> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in
> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections.
>
> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc
>> "the / operator returns the integer closest to zero"
>
>
> Hello,
>
> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in
> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections.
>
> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc
>> "the / operator returns the integer closest to zero"
>
>
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 19:05:55 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> `oddPart` contains a lot of info on the `modInverse` output, sometimes it's
> even the same. Clearing it in case the result is sensitive.
>
> No new regression test since it's difficult to access a temporary local
> variable in an internal
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:34:58 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in
> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections.
>
> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc
>> "the
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 19:05:55 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> `oddPart` contains a lot of info on the `modInverse` output, sometimes it's
> even the same. Clearing it in case the result is sensitive.
>
> No new regression test since it's difficult to access a temporary local
> variable in an internal
oddPart contains a lot of info on the modInverse output, sometimes it's even
the same. Clearing it in case the result is sensitive.
No new regression test since it's difficult to access a temporary local
variable in an internal class. Existing tier1-2 tests passed.
-
Commit
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 13:45:17 GMT, Andy Herrick wrote:
> JDK-8271344: Windows product version issue
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 0199b03e
Author:Andy Herrick
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/0199b03eb3bd9ffe79b5193ff1792144b5c488f1
Stats: 21
OK - took me a while to see what you are doing.
The problem is you are signing the pkg but building it from an unsigned
app-image.
If you are building in two phases (app-image, then installer package)
you need the --mac-sign option on both phases.
/Andy
On 8/3/2021 10:37 AM, Andy Herrick
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:42:18 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> The `floorDivExact()` methods are identical to their `floorDiv()`
>> counterparts aside from that they throw an `ArithmeticException` when the
>> dividend is `MIN_VALUE` and the divisor is `-1`. These methods behave with
>>
Thanks for the quick confirmation!
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:41 PM Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 03/08/2021 15:36, Volker Simonis wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a quick question on JDK-8198997 [1] (a follow-up of JDK-8194154
> > [2]) which introduced normalization for the cached "user.dir" property
>
On 03/08/2021 15:36, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
I have a quick question on JDK-8198997 [1] (a follow-up of JDK-8194154
[2]) which introduced normalization for the cached "user.dir" property
in order to avoid "inefficient, repeated normalization".
However, from what I can see,
Hi,
I have a quick question on JDK-8198997 [1] (a follow-up of JDK-8194154
[2]) which introduced normalization for the cached "user.dir" property
in order to avoid "inefficient, repeated normalization".
However, from what I can see, WinNTFileSystem.getUserPath(), the only
place where the cached
I was having problems notarizing anything yesterday, but fixed them today.
I can notarize my own test - but get failure when trying to notarize
your app as built from non-modular branch of
https://github.com/danielpeintner/Java11Test/
am looking into it ...
/Andy
On 8/2/2021 9:57 AM,
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:30:46 GMT, Wang Huang wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> Can you do me a favor to review this patch. This patch use `ldp` to
>> implement String.compareTo.
>>
>> * We add a JMH test case
>> * Here is the result of this test case
>>
>> Benchmark
> Dear all,
> Can you do me a favor to review this patch. This patch use `ldp` to
> implement String.compareTo.
>
> * We add a JMH test case
> * Here is the result of this test case
>
> Benchmark|(size)| Mode| Cnt|Score | Error |Units
>
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:28:07 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Add methods `floorDivExact(int,int)` and `floorDivExact(long,long)` to
>> `java.lang.Math` and `java.lang.StrictMath`.
>
> The `floorDivExact()` methods are identical to their `floorDiv()`
> counterparts aside from that they throw an
24 matches
Mail list logo
