On 7/29/20 7:44 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 20/07/2020 04:51, Ningsheng Jian wrote:
Since we are getting ready to propose Vector API target to JDK 16 [1]. I
have regenerated webrev of aarch64 backend parts from panama repo, which
has been rebased to jdk/jdk very recently, by:
$ hg update
On 20/07/2020 04:51, Ningsheng Jian wrote:
> Since we are getting ready to propose Vector API target to JDK 16 [1]. I
> have regenerated webrev of aarch64 backend parts from panama repo, which
> has been rebased to jdk/jdk very recently, by:
>
> $ hg update vector-unstable && hg diff -r default
-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net;
hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net;
aarch64-port-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (XXL): 8223347: Integration of
Vector API (Incubator): AArch64 backend changes
On 29/06/2020 08:48, Yang Zhang wrote:
1
@openjdk.java.net;
aarch64-port-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (XXL): 8223347: Integration of
Vector API (Incubator): AArch64 backend changes
On 29/06/2020 08:48, Yang Zhang wrote:
1. Instructions that can be matched with NEON instructions directly.
MulVB, SqrtVF and AbsV
: Integration of
Vector API (Incubator): AArch64 backend changes
On 29/06/2020 08:48, Yang Zhang wrote:
1. Instructions that can be matched with NEON instructions directly.
MulVB, SqrtVF and AbsV have been merged into jdk master already.
2. Instructions that jdk master has middle end support
30, 2020 12:10 AM
To: Yang Zhang ; Viswanathan, Sandhya
; Paul Sandoz
Cc: nd ; hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net;
hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net;
aarch64-port-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (XXL): 8223347: Integration of
Vector API
Sandoz
Cc: nd ; hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net;
hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net;
aarch64-port-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (XXL): 8223347: Integration of Vector API
(Incubator): AArch64 backend changes
On 29/06/2020 08:48, Yang Zhan
;
hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net;
aarch64-port-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (XXL): 8223347: Integration of Vector API
(Incubator): AArch64 backend changes
On 29/06/2020 08:48, Yang Zhang wrote:
> 1. Instructions that can be matc
@openjdk.java.net;
aarch64-port-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (XXL): 8223347: Integration of Vector API
(Incubator): AArch64 backend changes
Hi Yang,
I have merged vectorIntrinsics with changes from panama/default.
Hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Sandhya
-Original
-...@openjdk.java.net;
hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net;
aarch64-port-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (XXL): 8223347: Integration of Vector API
(Incubator): AArch64 backend changes
Hi Andrew,
1. Instructions that can be matched with NEON instructions directly
The message from this sender included one or more files
which could not be scanned for virus detection; do not
open these files unless you are certain of the sender's intent.
--
On 29/06/2020 08:48, Yang Zhang wrote:
> 1.
: nd ; hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net;
hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net;
aarch64-port-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (XXL): 8223347: Integration of Vector API
(Incubator): AArch64 backend changes
Hi Andrew/Yang,
We couldn’t propose
; hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net;
hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net;
aarch64-port-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (XXL): 8223347: Integration of Vector API
(Incubator): AArch64 backend changes
> But to my earlier question. please:
va.net; hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net;
core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net; aarch64-port-...@openjdk.java.net; nd
Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (XXL): 8223347: Integration of Vector API
(Incubator): AArch64 backend changes
On 25/05/2020 09:26, Yang Zhang wrote:
> In jdk master, what we n
On 25/05/2020 09:26, Yang Zhang wrote:
> In jdk master, what we need to do is that writing m4 file for existing
> vector instructions and placed them to a new file aarch64_neon.ad.
> If no question, I will do it right away.
I'm not entirely sure that such a change is necessary now. In particular,
ng Zhang ; hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net;
hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net;
aarch64-port-...@openjdk.java.net; nd
Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (XXL): 8223347: Integration of Vector API
(Incubator): AArch64 backend changes
On 5/22/20 7:01 PM, Paul Sandoz wr
On 5/22/20 7:01 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> We have made changes similar in spirit to the x64 ad file (reducing in size
> at least), so I think it reasonable request before integration to reduce the
> cognitive and maintenance burden.
So here's a question: can the changes to the AArch64 back end
> On May 22, 2020, at 10:40 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> On 5/22/20 5:12 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>
>> I am not terribly familiar with the AArch64 code, but I would note
>> the Vector API comes with a bunch of unit tests should exercise the
>> code gen, just not as directly as I presume you
On 5/22/20 5:12 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> I am not terribly familiar with the AArch64 code, but I would note
> the Vector API comes with a bunch of unit tests should exercise the
> code gen, just not as directly as I presume you would like.
Yes, you've understood me: direct is what I want. The
HI Andrew,
Thanks for looking.
I am not terribly familiar with the AArch64 code, but I would note the Vector
API comes with a bunch of unit tests should exercise the code gen, just not as
directly as I presume you would like.
To what extent do you feel we can follow up with additional issues
On 5/19/20 11:55 AM, Yang Zhang wrote:
> Following up on review requests of API [0], Java implementation and
> test [1], General Hotspot changes[2] for Vector API and x86 backend
> changes [3]. Here's a request for review of AArch64 backend changes
> required for supporting the Vector API:
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
