On 29/11/2011 23:01, Stuart Marks wrote:
On 11/29/11 8:10 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/7116404/webrev/
Wow, you're getting a jump on us! Any idea how many warnings this
cleared up? Looks like dozens.
110, so not too many. There is still plenty of low hanging
On 11/30/2011 11:00 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 29/11/2011 23:01, Stuart Marks wrote:
On 11/29/11 8:10 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/7116404/webrev/
Wow, you're getting a jump on us! Any idea how many warnings this
cleared up? Looks like dozens.
110, so not too
On 30/11/2011 15:06, Rémi Forax wrote:
Note that you can use clazz.asSubclass(Enum.class) instead of casting
to the raw type Class,
you will still have a warning but you will be not the one that have
introduced a raw type :)
Your mail arrived just a few minutes after I did the hg push. The
On 11/29/11 06:19 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
Looks good to me
Me too.
Just one minor opportunity for use of in ObjectInputStream
Class?[] classObjs = new Class*?*[interfaces.length];
---
Class?[] classObjs = new Class[interfaces.length];
-Chris.
Best
Lance
On Nov 29, 2011, at
On 11/29/11 8:10 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I don't have time on Thursday to get involved in the warnings fest [1]. However
I would like to contribute something and to that end the following webrev
proposes changes to eliminate the warnings from several classes including
java.rmi.**, the
cc'ing to jdk8-dev so that people know these classes have already been
tackled.
David
On 30/11/2011 2:10 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I don't have time on Thursday to get involved in the warnings fest [1].
However I would like to contribute something and to that end the
following webrev proposes
