On 28/11/2011 08:36, Jing Lv wrote:
Hello Alan,
I am fine with the fix on the webrev, suppose it would be applied
later?
I don't remember (as it's been a long time) exactly I found the
issue, maybe some code scan or some strong compiler :)
(Problem with my mail server so I can
On 11/29/11 06:12 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
looks ok to me...
+1
-Chris.
On Nov 29, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 28/11/2011 08:36, Jing Lv wrote:
Hello Alan,
I am fine with the fix on the webrev, suppose it would be applied later?
I don't remember (as it's
Hello,
I search the E:\workspace\openjdk\jdk\src\windows\native but find
nothing similar (please tell me if I miss something), so I suggest we
have a quick fix for now, like:
--- E:\workspace\openjdk\jdk\src\windows\native\java\io\io_util_md.h~
2011-11-15 15:53:21.0 +0800
+++
On 15/11/2011 08:09, Jing Lv wrote:
Hello,
I search the E:\workspace\openjdk\jdk\src\windows\native but find
nothing similar (please tell me if I miss something), so I suggest we
have a quick fix for now, like:
I'm not around this week but I will get back to you next week on this
(as I
Hello Alan,
(Sorry that haven't check this for months) I check with the bug
7030624 but see no progress now. What's the current status? Shall we go
on with a simple patch to fix the problem?
On 2011/7/21 21:32, Alan Bateman wrote:
Jing LV wrote:
Ping, anyone notice this? :)
My plan is
Hello,
It's been quite a long time and it seems jdk7 is doing well now. I
know there is still several days before its release, anyway, Alan or
someone else, would you please tell me if we can start work on jdk8, and
restart the discussion on the bugs like this (I remember there are still
于 2011-4-26 16:43, Alan Bateman 写道:
Jing LV wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for raising the defect. I see there is no patch now, so I
create one (as the defect mentioned jint may be good, I use jint here).
I have no Sun Online Account Id, would someone take a look?
The function prototypes
Hello,
Thanks for raising the defect. I see there is no patch now, so I
create one (as the defect mentioned jint may be good, I use jint here).
I have no Sun Online Account Id, would someone take a look?
diff --git a/src/windows/native/java/io/io_util_md.c
Jing LV wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for raising the defect. I see there is no patch now, so I
create one (as the defect mentioned jint may be good, I use jint here).
I have no Sun Online Account Id, would someone take a look?
The function prototypes would also require to be updated and
On 26/04/11 09:43, Alan Bateman wrote:
. Another point is that jdk8 will be our opportunity to remove the
dependencies on the JVM_* functions
That sounds interesting Alan - care to share more?
Steve Poole wrote:
On 26/04/11 09:43, Alan Bateman wrote:
. Another point is that jdk8 will be our opportunity to remove the
dependencies on the JVM_* functions
That sounds interesting Alan - care to share more?
As you know, it's really hard to remove things from the JDK. Medals are
few.
Steve Poole wrote:
Ok Alan - thanks for the background. I must of missed the VM option
along the way - what's it called?
It's HotSpot specific and is named UseVMInterruptibleIO.
-Alan
于 2011-3-23 18:23, Alan Bateman 写道:
Jing LV wrote:
Hello,
I found a problem in windows/native/java/io/io_util_md.c, method
handleRead(). The return type of the method is size_t, which is defined
as unsigned int. However we see the method would return negative values
while it meets some error.
Jing LV wrote:
:
Thanks Alan. Would you please tell me the bug number?
The bug now tracking this is:
7030624: size_t usages in src/windows/native/java/io/io_util_md.c need
to be re-visited
-Alan.
Hello,
I found a problem in windows/native/java/io/io_util_md.c, method
handleRead(). The return type of the method is size_t, which is defined
as unsigned int. However we see the method would return negative values
while it meets some error. This may be a problem as the API comsumer and
later
Jing LV wrote:
Hello,
I found a problem in windows/native/java/io/io_util_md.c, method
handleRead(). The return type of the method is size_t, which is defined
as unsigned int. However we see the method would return negative values
while it meets some error. This may be a problem as the API
16 matches
Mail list logo
