On 19/02/2016 03:10, Iris Clark wrote:
Hi, Alan and Rachel.
Here's a proposal for the new text for JEP 223:
---
[ insert between existing sections "@since..." and "Mercurial..."]
JNI Version
The [JNI Specification][JNISpec] defines a constant representing the JNI version number.
The
updating the JNI Spec itself?
Thanks,
iris
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bateman
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 11:49 PM
To: Rachel Protacio; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net;
core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net; Iris Clark
Subject: Re: JNI VERSION CHANGE: RFR: 8145098: JNI GetVersio
Thanks for the reviews, David and Alan!
Rachel
On 2/18/2016 2:48 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 17/02/2016 21:21, Rachel Protacio wrote:
Hello, everyone,
We are moving forward with "JNI_VERSION_9". If it later turns out
that it should be "9_0", we will file a separate bug, but the plain 9
is
On 17/02/2016 21:21, Rachel Protacio wrote:
Hello, everyone,
We are moving forward with "JNI_VERSION_9". If it later turns out that
it should be "9_0", we will file a separate bug, but the plain 9 is
most likely. There is currently a compatibility request in the
approval process.
Here is
Hi Rachel,
On 18/02/2016 7:21 AM, Rachel Protacio wrote:
Hello, everyone,
We are moving forward with "JNI_VERSION_9". If it later turns out that
it should be "9_0", we will file a separate bug, but the plain 9 is most
likely. There is currently a compatibility request in the approval process.
Hello, everyone,
We are moving forward with "JNI_VERSION_9". If it later turns out that
it should be "9_0", we will file a separate bug, but the plain 9 is most
likely. There is currently a compatibility request in the approval process.
Here is the updated code, which builds properly and
Thanks for the review, Dan. We'll see how the 9 v. 9_0 discussion plays out.
Rachel
On 1/28/2016 1:37 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 1/27/16 4:02 PM, Rachel Protacio wrote:
Hello!
Small but important change for review: updating the JNI_VERSION and
in so doing, changing the format from
On 27/01/2016 23:02, Rachel Protacio wrote:
Hello!
Small but important change for review: updating the JNI_VERSION and in
so doing, changing the format from JNI_VERSION_1_x to JNI_VERSION_x_y
(see code/bug for details).
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145098
hotspot repo
On 1/27/16 4:02 PM, Rachel Protacio wrote:
Hello!
Small but important change for review: updating the JNI_VERSION and in
so doing, changing the format from JNI_VERSION_1_x to JNI_VERSION_x_y
(see code/bug for details).
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145098
hotspot repo
