Hi Joe, Paul,
On 30/06/15 10:47, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
OK - I will replace the offending diamonds before pushing.
On 30/06/15 10:49, Paul Sandoz wrote:> I am beseech you not to do that!
>
> Unless there is a really strong reason why JAXP 8 code should be the
> same as JAXP 9 code we should be a
Hi Joe,
On 30/06/15 00:52, huizhe wang wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Another great cleanup! The change looks good to me. Only minor
suggestion: same as 8129956, would you want to add the types back
instead of using diamond operator? It looks good, but the red flags in
the NetBeans could be a bit troubleso
Hi Daniel,
Another great cleanup! The change looks good to me. Only minor
suggestion: same as 8129956, would you want to add the types back
instead of using diamond operator? It looks good, but the red flags in
the NetBeans could be a bit troublesome. Plus, honestly, I still
regularly compil
Hi,
Please find below a patch that cleans up some of the
reflection usage in jaxp.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130051
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8130051/webrev.00/
This is not a deep cleanup - it is just a first pass...
There may be some opportunity to get rid of so
