On 16/09/21 4:05 am, Roger Riggs wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 21:46:59 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Properties.java line 819:
817: *
818: * If the {@systemProperty java.util.Properties.storeDate} is set and
819: * is non-empty (as determined
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:13:56 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Properties.java line 932:
>>
>>> 930: if (entries instanceof Collections.SynchronizedSet ss
>>> 931: && ss.c instanceof EntrySet) {
>>> 932: entries =
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 22:32:33 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> This is a clever way to detect whether the `entrySet()` method has been
>> overridden to return something other than the entry-set provided by the
>> Properties class... but I'm wondering if it's too clever. Does anyone who
>> overrides
On 15/09/21 9:48 pm, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 15:31:45 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
- Clarify how overriden Properties#entrySet() method impacts the order of
stored
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 21:46:59 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Properties.java line 819:
>>
>>> 817: *
>>> 818: * If the {@systemProperty java.util.Properties.storeDate} is set
>>> and
>>> 819: * is non-empty (as determined by {@link
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 15:59:53 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> - Clarify how overriden Properties#entrySet() method impacts the order of
>> stored properties
>> - Tests to verify
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 15:31:45 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> - Clarify how overriden Properties#entrySet() method impacts the order of
>> stored properties
>> - Tests to verify
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 06:11:23 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> The commit in this PR implements the proposal for enhancement that was
>> discussed in the core-libs-dev mailing list recently[1], for
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231640
>>
>> At a high level - the `store()` APIs in
> The commit in this PR implements the proposal for enhancement that was
> discussed in the core-libs-dev mailing list recently[1], for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231640
>
> At a high level - the `store()` APIs in `Properties` have been modified to
> now look for the
