On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 20:08:11 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
>> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>>
>> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
>> changed as
> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as follows:
> 1. grandfathered -> legacy
> 2. blacklist -> filter or
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 07:10:41 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Brent Christian has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> improve SERIAL_FILTER_PATTERN comment
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Locale.java line 1649:
>
>> 1647:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 23:14:14 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
>> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>>
>> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
>> changed as
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 23:14:14 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
>> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>>
>> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
>> changed as
> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as follows:
> 1. grandfathered -> legacy
> 2. blacklist -> filter or
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 22:13:58 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> It's an adverb, since it's the act of 'defining' that is being done too
>> restrictively or broadly. If you want to have an adjective you would need to
>> rephrase it so it applies to the noun, like 'defining a too restrictive
>>
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 22:21:12 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
>> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>>
>> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
>> changed as
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 22:21:12 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
>> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>>
>> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
>> changed as
> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as follows:
> 1. grandfathered -> legacy
> 2. blacklist -> filter or
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:17:03 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Your call, I'm not a native English speaker :-) It felt to me it's
>> 'restrictive' than 'restrictively', an adj placed after the noun, e.g. a
>> restrictive allow-list.
>
> It's an adverb, since it's the act of 'defining' that is
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 21:57:17 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Brent Christian has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> updates, per code review
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/ClassLoader/Assert.java line 65:
>
>> 63:
>> 64: int
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 22:02:00 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/lang/ClassLoader/Assert.java line 65:
>>
>>> 63:
>>> 64: int switchSource = 0;
>>> 65: if (args.length == 0) { // This is the coordinator version
>>
>> Perhaps s/coordinator/controller/?
>
> Let's change
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 01:46:08 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
>> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>>
>> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
>> changed as
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:32:12 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Brent Christian has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> updates, per code review
>
> test/jdk/java/nio/channels/SocketChannel/CloseRegisteredChannel.java line 45:
>
>>
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 01:41:07 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> I agree that there is room for improvement here. How about:
>> "...an allow-list too restrictively, or a reject-list too broadly, may..."
>> ?
>
> Your call, I'm not a native English speaker :-) It felt to me it's
> 'restrictive' than
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 01:46:08 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
>> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>>
>> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
>> changed as
> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as follows:
> 1. grandfathered -> legacy
> 2. blacklist -> filter or
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 01:36:27 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> src/java.management.rmi/share/classes/javax/management/remote/rmi/RMIConnectorServer.java
>> line 152:
>>
>>> 150: *
>>> 151: * Care must be taken when defining such a filter, as defining
>>> 152: * an accept-list too
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 21:08:35 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
>> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>>
>> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
>> changed as follows:
>>
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:36:48 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as follows:
>
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:36:48 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as follows:
>
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:36:48 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as follows:
>
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:36:48 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as follows:
>
This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words
with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).
Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
changed as follows:
1. grandfathered -> legacy
2. blacklist -> filter or reject
3.
25 matches
Mail list logo
