Re: RFR 7117360: Warnings in java.util.concurrent.atomic package

2011-12-05 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 05/12/2011 02:52, David Holmes wrote: Thanks Chris and Doug et al. These fixups look good to me too. One minor nit: src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/atomic/AtomicLong.java The javadoc changes on longValue() changed actual text not just formatting. It changes it to be consistent with

RFR 7117360: Warnings in java.util.concurrent.atomic package

2011-12-02 Thread Chris Hegarty
Cleanup compiler warnings in the java.util.concurrent.atomic package. This is a sync up with the raw type warning fixes in Doug's CVS, along with some minor style cleanup. With this change there are still 2 outstanding unchecked casts in AtomicReferenceArray and AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater.

Re: RFR 7117360: Warnings in java.util.concurrent.atomic package

2011-12-02 Thread Chris Hegarty
Oh, AtomicBoolean.java and AtomicReference.java show no differences in the webrev, but there is a correction to the indentation in the static initializer. And just to point out, along with raw type warning fixes there is a removal of a redundant cast ;-) -Chris. On 02/12/2011 14:25,

Re: RFR 7117360: Warnings in java.util.concurrent.atomic package

2011-12-02 Thread Doug Lea
On 12/02/11 09:25, Chris Hegarty wrote: Cleanup compiler warnings in the java.util.concurrent.atomic package. This is a sync up with the raw type warning fixes in Doug's CVS, along with some minor style cleanup. With this change there are still 2 outstanding unchecked casts in

Re: RFR 7117360: Warnings in java.util.concurrent.atomic package

2011-12-02 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 12/ 2/11 04:22 PM, Doug Lea wrote: We just went through these and others, and believe that everything is now warning free. Thanks Doug, Wow you guys are quick! I pulled in these specific changes (atomic) and updated the webrev: