On 09/11/2011 12:41, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
I looked at the core and sql changes and they are fine.
I will great a bug for these and submit the change-set.
Thanks Lance. I quickly scanned the changes in the Core and SQL webrevs
and they looks fine to me. Joe might want to look at the
Hello,
On 11/10/2011 1:29 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 09/11/2011 12:41, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
I looked at the core and sql changes and they are fine.
I will great a bug for these and submit the change-set.
Thanks Lance. I quickly scanned the changes in the Core and SQL
webrevs and
Le 10/11/11 16:24, Joe Darcy a écrit :
The Float and Double changes look fine. I don't know why the constructors
were coded up that way;
Maybe because the Float(String) / Double(String) constructors were coded in Java
1.0, while the parseFloat(String) / parseDouble(String) methods were added
: javadoc typos, javac
warnings, etc.
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:46:48 +0100
From: Martin Desruisseaux martin.desruisse...@geomatys.fr
Organization: Geomatys
CC: jdk8-...@openjdk.java.net
Hello all
It took me a while, but I finally posted the patches that I submitted last month
as webrev
as one change-set, leaving the
client area changes for review on the 2d or other list.
-Alan.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Miscellaneous minor patches: javadoc typos, javac warnings,
etc.
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:46:48 +0100
From: Martin
be trivial to review and push as one
change-set, leaving the client area changes for review on the 2d or
other list.
-Alan.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Miscellaneous minor patches: javadoc typos, javac
warnings, etc.
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:46:48 +0100
From: Martin
Hello Phil
Le 09/11/11 18:37, Phil Race a écrit :
Please do register on 2d-dev and propose the 2D changes there.
Registration done, I will post in a few minutes.
The hashcode change
definitely needs discussion, I think there may be views on the NaN comparison
as my
understanding is that
