On May 26, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Here is an updated webrev:
>
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk9/JDK-8080945-nearly-sorted-primitives/webrev/
>
Updated with some contributed JMH benchmarks located in the test area. To be
moved when there is a better location (i
From: Paul Sandoz [mailto:paul.san...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:02 AM
To: Rezaei, Mohammad A. [Tech]
Cc: 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net Libs'; Chan, Sunny [Tech]; O'Leary, Kristen
[Tech]
Subject: Re: Patch to improve primitives Array.sort()
On May 22, 2015, at 1:52 AM,
Here is an updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk9/JDK-8080945-nearly-sorted-primitives/webrev/
I took the liberty of:
- in DualPivotQuicksort sprinkling some more comments; and
- moving and renaming the test. Code was also reformatted to better fit the
JDK style. I reduce
On May 22, 2015, at 9:56 PM, "O'Leary, Kristen" wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> We've created an additional test based on your suggestion: an array of size
> 10,000,000, 32 pair flips, a run of zeroes in the middle, and 32 pair flips
> at the end. Here are the results for int:
> Benchmark
On May 26, 2015, at 4:19 AM, "Chan, Sunny" wrote:
> I have looked at the mailing list archive and so far I haven’t identify any
> progress on the “space for benchmark” – so we could include the performance
> test as a part of the patch but it will required JMH access somehow.
I think that's
May 2015 22:24
To: Rezaei, Mohammad A. [Tech]
Cc: 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net Libs'; Chan, Sunny [Tech]; O'Leary, Kristen
[Tech]
Subject: Re: Patch to improve primitives Array.sort()
On May 22, 2015, at 3:55 PM, "Rezaei, Mohammad A."
mailto:mohammad.rez...@gs.com>
On May 22, 2015, at 3:55 PM, "Rezaei, Mohammad A."
wrote:
> We have a set of JMH tests.
Great.
I created a bug for this issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8080945
> We'll work with Sunny to make those part of the webrev (where do they go?)
> and the specific test you suggeste
ezaei, Mohammad A. [Tech]
>Cc: 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net Libs'; Chan, Sunny [Tech]; O'Leary,
>Kristen [Tech]
>Subject: Re: Patch to improve primitives Array.sort()
>
>On May 22, 2015, at 1:52 AM, "Rezaei, Mohammad A."
>wrote:
>> Thanks Paul. Yo
On May 22, 2015, at 1:52 AM, "Rezaei, Mohammad A."
wrote:
> Thanks Paul. Your proposed changes make sense to us and they have no
> discernable impact on the performance.
>
Great, thanks. I am happy to update the current webrev (and also create an
associated issue).
Sorry to drag this out a
Cc: Chan, Sunny [Tech]; O'Leary, Kristen [Tech]; Rezaei, Mohammad A. [Tech]
>Subject: Re: Patch to improve primitives Array.sort()
>
>Hi,
>
>I finally got some time to better understand the patch and more generally this
>area of code.
>
>I applied the patch and ran the
mailto:paul.san...@oracle.com]
> Sent: 16 May 2015 00:13
> To: Chan, Sunny [Tech]
> Cc: O'Leary, Kristen [Tech]; 'Alan Bateman';
> 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net'; Rezaei, Mohammad A. [Tech]
> Subject: Re: Patch to improve primitives Array.s
2015 00:13
To: Chan, Sunny [Tech]
Cc: O'Leary, Kristen [Tech]; 'Alan Bateman'; 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net';
Rezaei, Mohammad A. [Tech]
Subject: Re: Patch to improve primitives Array.sort()
On May 15, 2015, at 11:48 AM, "Chan, Sunny"
mailto:sunny.c...@gs.
On May 15, 2015, at 11:48 AM, "Chan, Sunny" wrote:
> I have provided Paul with an updated patch:
>
Here it is:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/tmp/gs/sort/webrev.1/
In DualPivotQuicksort
63 /**
64 * The maximum length of run in merge sort.
65 */
66 private stat
en [Tech]
Sent: 11 May 2015 23:33
To: 'Alan Bateman'; Paul Sandoz; Chan, Sunny [Tech]
Cc: 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net'; Rezaei, Mohammad A. [Tech]
Subject: RE: Patch to improve primitives Array.sort()
Hi Alan,
For MAX_RUN_LENGTH, the constant was used to limit the size of
revision sent out.
Thanks!
Kristen
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 5:09 AM
To: Paul Sandoz; Chan, Sunny [Tech]
Cc: 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net'; O'Leary, Kristen [Tech]
Subject: Re: Patch to improve primit
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.core-libs.devel/2628)
Sunny
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bateman [mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com]
Sent: 24 April 2015 17:09
To: Paul Sandoz; Chan, Sunny [Tech]
Cc: 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net'; O'Leary, Kristen [Tech]
S
On 24/04/2015 09:57, Paul Sandoz wrote:
See here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/tmp/gs/sort/webrev/
Some very quick comments as i have not yet had time to review more closely:
- IANAL so i dunno about the GS copyright in the files.
- The constant MAX_RUN_LENGTH is no longer used so c
See here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/tmp/gs/sort/webrev/
Some very quick comments as i have not yet had time to review more closely:
- IANAL so i dunno about the GS copyright in the files.
- The constant MAX_RUN_LENGTH is no longer used so could be removed. But i
would like to under
a.net'; O'Leary, Kristen [Tech]
Subject: Re: Patch to improve primitives Array.sort()
HI Chan,
Attachments might be getting removed by the OpenJDK email server.
If you send me the webrev privately i can upload to cr. If so could you do that
please send the JMH tests as i think peopl
HI Chan,
Attachments might be getting removed by the OpenJDK email server.
If you send me the webrev privately i can upload to cr. If so could you do that
please send the JMH tests as i think people might also be interested in those.
Paul.
On Apr 24, 2015, at 9:17 AM, "Chan, Sunny" wrote:
>
Sorry the spam filter we use didn't like the webrev.zip so I have attached the
text patch file instead.
From: Chan, Sunny [Tech]
Sent: 24 April 2015 15:17
To: 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net'
Cc: O'Leary, Kristen [Tech]
Subject: Patch to improve primitives Array.sort()
We are proposing a patch
21 matches
Mail list logo
