On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 23:36:20 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> 8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification
>>
>> Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This
>> does affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify
>>
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:11:04 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Stuart Marks has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> non-serializable classes => non-serializable superclasses
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Serializable.java li
> 8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification
>
> Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This does
> affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify the
> text, not to make any semantic changes. Thus, a CSR reque
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:44:10 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> 8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification
>
> Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This does
> affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify the
> t
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:44:10 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> 8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification
>
> Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This does
> affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify the
> t
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:44:10 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> 8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification
>
> Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This does
> affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify the
> t
