Paul, Mandy,
thanks for reviewing!
Pushed.
/Claes
On 2018-03-12 18:03, mandy chung wrote:
On 3/12/18 5:37 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
I found what appears to be a simple omission from my earlier work to
pre-generate
LambdaForms at jlink time, in that the DIRECT_NEW_INVOKE_SPECIAL kind
On 3/12/18 5:37 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
I found what appears to be a simple omission from my earlier work to
pre-generate
LambdaForms at jlink time, in that the DIRECT_NEW_INVOKE_SPECIAL kind
is never looked
up nor pregenerated.
Fixing that means we're covering a few more kinds of LF
+1
Paul.
> On Mar 12, 2018, at 5:37 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found what appears to be a simple omission from my earlier work to
> pre-generate
> LambdaForms at jlink time, in that the DIRECT_NEW_INVOKE_SPECIAL kind is
> never looked
> up nor pregenerated.
>
> Fixing that mean
On 2018-03-12 16:03, Alan Bateman wrote:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8199453/jdk.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199453
This looks okay to me.
Thanks, Alan!
In case anyone wonders, this is one of several jlink plugins that are
tightly coupled to java.
On 12/03/2018 12:37, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
I found what appears to be a simple omission from my earlier work to
pre-generate
LambdaForms at jlink time, in that the DIRECT_NEW_INVOKE_SPECIAL kind
is never looked
up nor pregenerated.
Fixing that means we're covering a few more kinds of L
