On Tue, 24 May 2022 21:10:29 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Just FYI. There is a mistake in this changeset. The JDK ProblemList already
> contained:
>
> `java/nio/channels/FileChannel/LargeMapTest.java 8286980 windows-all`
>
> and this change then added:
>
>
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
On Tue, 24 May 2022 07:01:52 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Please approve, @AlanBateman, @mcimadamore and others?
Okay with me.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8843
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
> we can problemlist the failing tests to get cleaner runs for other patches.
> This
> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
> we can problemlist the failing tests to get cleaner runs for other patches.
> This
On Mon, 23 May 2022 15:36:01 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Okay, so the issue is SpliteratorTest uses preview APIs and having the
>> configuration in TEST.properties means that all the streams tests are run
>> with this option.
>
> Yes, `TEST.properties` is way too broad. I'd keep the
On Mon, 23 May 2022 15:34:11 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Those tests *do* run with preview enabled:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/test/jdk/java/util/stream/test/TEST.properties#L10-L11
>> -- and I know that because I basically copy-pasted all jtreg failures that
>> lead to
On Mon, 23 May 2022 15:18:10 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> test/jdk/ProblemList.txt line 894:
>>
>>> 892:
>>> java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/CollectionAndMapModifyStreamTest.java
>>> 8286642 generic-i586
>>> 893:
>>>
On Mon, 23 May 2022 12:28:30 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
> we can problemlist the
On Mon, 23 May 2022 15:13:02 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
On Mon, 23 May 2022 12:28:30 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
> we can problemlist the
14 matches
Mail list logo
