Thank you.
My email: otavioj...@java.net
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Claes Redestad
wrote:
>
> On 2015-01-25 23:30, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana wrote:
>
>> Can anyone help me as sponsor?
>>
>
> Sure, why not.
>
> I'll remove the escaped double-quote as per Paul's request and run it
> throug
On 2015-01-25 23:30, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana wrote:
Can anyone help me as sponsor?
Sure, why not.
I'll remove the escaped double-quote as per Paul's request and run it
through a
quick sanity test. Which e-mail do you want to get credited?
/Claes
Can anyone help me as sponsor?
On May 27, 2014 2:17 PM, "Otávio Gonçalves de Santana" <
otaviopolianasant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can anyone help me as sponsor?
> On May 12, 2014 1:57 PM, "Paul Sandoz" wrote:
>
>> On Apr 26, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>> otavioj...@java.net>
On the same topic but still a bit different shouldn't indexOf(String)
check for the size and call indexOf(char) when the length is 1, same for
indexOf(String,int)?
Tom
On 26.04.14 11:56, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana wrote:
> When a String has length just one, could be replaced by equivalent
> char
Can anyone help me as sponsor?
On May 12, 2014 1:57 PM, "Paul Sandoz" wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
> otavioj...@java.net> wrote:
> > When a String has length just one, could be replaced by equivalent
> > character literals, gaining some performance enhancem
On Apr 26, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
wrote:
> When a String has length just one, could be replaced by equivalent
> character literals, gaining some performance enhancement.
>
> I found 107 changes.
>
This looks good to me, just one small issue:
--- a/src/share/classes/jav
link:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16109193/open_jdk/index_of_with_char.zip
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
otavioj...@java.net> wrote:
>
> link:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16109193/open_jdk/index_of_with_char.zip
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:
On Apr 27, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Claes Redestad wrote:
> Possibly a few bytes in static class footprint, sure. Maybe this is something
> javac should optimize (javap on some trivial examples suggests this doesn't
> happen) rather than trying to root out all suboptimal cases, especially since
> ther
