RE: Review request for JDK-8132660: Change jaxp unit test package name to be different with jaxp api

Hi Joe Thank you very much! Really good advice! I have adjusted as it, please re-check at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/8132660/webrev.01/ Btw, I only applied this practice on unit test, not for functional test because Tristan still has a functional suite pending, I would unify the

Re: Review request for JDK-8132660: Change jaxp unit test package name to be different with jaxp api

Hi Frank, This looks good to me. Best, Joe On 8/5/2015 3:04 AM, Frank Yuan wrote: Hi Joe Thank you very much! Really good advice! I have adjusted as it, please re-check at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/8132660/webrev.01/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Efyuan/8132660/webrev.01/ Btw,

Review request for JDK-8132660: Change jaxp unit test package name to be different with jaxp api

Hi, Joe and all Would you like to have a review for bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132660? This is already on our plan for a while, but I have to finish it now because these unit tests failed with latest Jigsaw build. However I made the changes based on 9-dev repo, I tested

Re: Review request for JDK-8132660: Change jaxp unit test package name to be different with jaxp api

Hi Frank, That looks fine. However, instead of appending an additional directory utests, you could make the paths shorter by removing javax/xml and org/w3c or org/xml. The short names are good enough to represent the API names, test/javax/xml/jaxp/unittest/parsers for example, is easily