Changeset: 2d08b404cd91
Author:jzavgren
Date: 2012-11-20 09:26 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/2d08b404cd91
8000476: Memory Leaks and uninitialized memory access in PKCS11 and other
native code
Reviewed-by: dsamersoff, valeriep, chegar
! src/share/bin/wildcar
On 20/11/2012 02:43, David DeHaven wrote:
:
After discussion and debate, we've decided the best course of action right now
is to drop the JavaFX-Application-Class support for this round and revisit
(hopefully quickly) in M6. This should alleviate any concerns for Profile
support. There are oth
Hi!
> The one possible addition is to check that m1 hasn't been modified
> after the mutation of m2.
Sounds good. I have added the second test and retested against both
OpenJDK and OracleJDK builds:
[ Code Review for jdk ]
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/7198904/webrev.01/
Would someone pl
On 19/11/2012 17:49, Mike Duigou wrote:
By amazing coincidence a review for fixing this was issued last week:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-November/012266.html
Additional review would be welcome. :-)
The patch will probably be ready for push before the end of the m
On 19 nov 2012, at 13:35, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 19/11/2012 11:15, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>> :
>> I think you are right that bytecode instrumentation would also work. The
>> only problem I see (apart from the path field) is the time it would take to
>> develop such a solution. I'm not sure if
On 20/11/2012 14:10, Staffan Larsen wrote:
:
The original plan was for the code in this review to go into both 8 and 7u12.
Since 7u12 has a tighter deadline, a possible path would be to include it only
in 7u12, but not in 8. For 8 we would then implement a fully dynamic solution.
The only thin
On 11/20/2012 2:14 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 20/11/2012 02:43, David DeHaven wrote:
:
After discussion and debate, we've decided the best course of action
right now is to drop the JavaFX-Application-Class support for this
round and revisit (hopefully quickly) in M6. This should alleviate
any
Changeset: 914cd9b482c8
Author:ksrini
Date: 2012-11-19 19:49 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/914cd9b482c8
8001533: java launcher must launch javafx applications
Reviewed-by: ksrini, mchung, kcr, alanb
Contributed-by: david.deha...@oracle.com
! src/share/bin/ja
Changeset: a25c53e12bd0
Author:jjg
Date: 2012-11-20 07:21 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/a25c53e12bd0
8003649: regression/langtools: tools/javac/doctree
Reviewed-by: ksrini
! test/tools/javac/doctree/DocCommentTester.java
Changeset: fb97eaf93d61
Author:jjg
Date: 2012-11-20 07:25 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/fb97eaf93d61
8003650: java.lang.Exception: expected string not found: pkg/package-frame.html
Reviewed-by: ksrini
! test/tools/javadoc/api/basic/GetTask_WriterTest.j
Changeset: 7538e419a588
Author:mcimadamore
Date: 2012-11-20 15:43 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/7538e419a588
8003663: lambda test fails on Windows
Summary: fix path separator issue in test
Reviewed-by: jjg
! test/tools/javac/lambda/abort/Abort.java
Looks good. Thank you for making the change.
Mike
On Nov 20 2012, at 04:55 , David Buck wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > The one possible addition is to check that m1 hasn't been modified
> > after the mutation of m2.
>
> Sounds good. I have added the second test and retested against both OpenJDK
> and Ora
On 11/20/12 6:20 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 20/11/2012 14:10, Staffan Larsen wrote:
:
The original plan was for the code in this review to go into both 8
and 7u12. Since 7u12 has a tighter deadline, a possible path would be
to include it only in 7u12, but not in 8. For 8 we would then
impleme
Changeset: d898d9ee352f
Author:rfield
Date: 2012-11-20 09:58 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/d898d9ee352f
8003639: convert lambda testng tests to jtreg and add them
Reviewed-by: mcimadamore
+ test/tools/javac/defaultMethodExecution/DefaultMethodRegressio
14 matches
Mail list logo
